An adjustable-length intramedullary (IM) nail may reduce both complications secondary to fracture fixation and manufacturing costs. We hypothesized that our novel nail would have suitable mechanical performance. To test this hypothesis, we manufactured three prototypes and evaluated them in quasi-static axial compression and torsion and quasi-static four-point bending. Prototypes were dynamically evaluated in both cyclic axial loading and four-point bending and torsion-to-failure. The prototypes exceeded expectations; they were comparable in both quasi-static axial stiffness (1.41 ± 0.37 N/m in cervine tibiae and 2.30 ± 0.63 in cadaver tibiae) and torsional stiffness (1.05 ± 0.26 N·m/deg in cervine tibiae) to currently used nails. The quasi-static four-point bending stiffness was 80.11 ± 09.360, greater than reported for currently used nails. A length-variance analysis indicates that moderate changes in length do not unacceptably alter bone-implant axial stiffness. After 103,000 cycles of axial loading, the prototype failed at the locking screws, comparable to locking screw failures seen clinically. The prototypes survived 1,000,000 cycles of four-point bend cyclic loading, as indicated by a consistent phase angle throughout cyclic loading. The torsion-to-failure test suggests that the prototype has adequate resistance to applied torques that might occur during the healing process. Together, these results suggest that our novel IM nail performs sufficiently well to merit further development. If brought to market, this adjustable-length IM nail could reduce both patient complications and healthcare costs.
Experimental study of the influence of sand base reinforcement on the development of deformations under static and cyclic loading
