scholarly journals Correction to: Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Hirase ◽  
Jeremiah F. Ling ◽  
Varan Haghshenas ◽  
Jeyvikram Thirumavalavan ◽  
David Dong ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Hirase ◽  
Jeremiah F. Ling ◽  
Varan Haghshenas ◽  
Jeyvikram Thirumavalavan ◽  
David Dong ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To review and compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods A systematic review was performed according to Preferred reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. All level I–III evidence studies investigating the clinical and radiologic outcomes of ASF and PSF for the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS were included. Results Nine studies (285 ASF patients, 298 PSF patients) were included. ASF was associated with a significantly lower number of levels fused compared with PSF (p < 0.01) with similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction (p = 0.16; p = 0.12, respectively). PSF achieved a better correction of thoracic hypokyphosis in one study and lumbar hypolordosis in three studies. PSF was associated with a significant shorter length of stay (LOS) compared with ASF (p < 0.01). One long-term study demonstrated a significantly higher rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) with PSF compared with ASF. There were no significant differences in major complication or re-operation rates. Conclusion For the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS, there is moderate evidence to suggest that ASF requires a lower number of instrumented levels to achieve similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction compared with PSF. There is some evidence to suggest that PSF may achieve better thoracic and lumbar sagittal deformity correction compared with ASF. There is some evidence to suggest a higher incidence of PJK at long-term follow-up with PSF compared with ASF. ASF is associated with a longer post-operative LOS compared with PSF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. e629-e633
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Harris ◽  
Majd Marrache ◽  
Varun Puvanesarajah ◽  
Micheal Raad ◽  
Richard L. Skolasky ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 603-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Hayashi ◽  
Hidetomi Terai ◽  
Hiromitsu Toyoda ◽  
Akinobu Suzuki ◽  
Masatoshi Hoshino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Yuk Kwan Tang ◽  
Vijay H. D. Kamath ◽  
Prudence Wing Hang Cheung ◽  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Abstract Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity. Posterior spinal fusion remains an important surgical treatment for AIS. This study aims to determine the predictive factors for intraoperative blood loss in AIS surgery. Methods Patients who had undergone posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a single university hospital were reviewed over a 7-year period. Predictive factors for intra-operative blood loss were studied by multivariate analysis to derive a regression model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values of factors contributing to significant intraoperative blood loss (≥500 ml). Results Two hundred and twelve patients were included. Intraoperative blood loss was found to be correlated with gender (rs = 0.30 (0.17–0.43)), preoperative hemoglobin level (rs = 0.20 (0.04–0.31)), preoperative Cobb angle (rs = 0.20 (0.02–0.29)), number of fused levels (rs = 0.46 (0.34–0.58)), operation duration (rs = 0.65 (0.54–0.75)), number of anchors (rs = 0.47 (0.35–0.59)), and p-value ranged from < 0.001 to < 0.05. Significant intraoperative blood loss was influenced by the male gender, operation duration greater than 257.5 min and more than 10 anchors used. Conclusions Male gender, increased operation duration and higher number of anchors predicted higher intra-operative blood loss.


Author(s):  
Aladine A. Elsamadicy ◽  
Isaac G. Freedman ◽  
Andrew B. Koo ◽  
Wyatt B. David ◽  
John Havlik ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence L. Haber ◽  
Erika D. Womack ◽  
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy ◽  
James A. Moss ◽  
Michael Wade Shrader

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Fletcher ◽  
Hopkins Jeffrey ◽  
McClung Anna ◽  
Richard Browne ◽  
Daniel J. Sucato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document