In vivo electrochemical demonstration of potassium-evoked monoamine release from rat cerebellum

1987 ◽  
Vol 413 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg A. Gerhardt ◽  
Greg M. Rose ◽  
Barry J. Hoffer
1991 ◽  
Vol 558 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Bickford-Wimer ◽  
Kevin Pang ◽  
Greg M. Rose ◽  
Greg A. Gerhardt

2018 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Hasenhuetl ◽  
Shreyas Bhat ◽  
Felix P. Mayer ◽  
Harald H. Sitte ◽  
Michael Freissmuth ◽  
...  

The plasmalemmal monoamine transporters for dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin (SERT) are targets for amphetamines. In vivo, amphetamines elicit most, if not all, of their actions by triggering monoamine efflux. This is thought to be accomplished by an amphetamine-induced switch from the forward-transport to the substrate-exchange mode. The mechanism underlying this switch has remained elusive; available kinetic models posit that substrates and cosubstrate Na+ ions bind either in a random or in a sequential order. Neither can account for all reported experimental observations. We used electrophysiological recordings to interrogate crucial conformational transitions associated with the binding of five different substrates (serotonin, para-chloroamphetamine, and the high-affinity naphthyl-propan-amines PAL-287, PAL-1045, and PAL-1046) to human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells; specifically, we determined the relaxation kinetics of SERT from a substrate-loaded to a substrate-free state at various intracellular and extracellular Na+ concentrations. These rates and their dependence on intracellular and extracellular Na+ concentrations differed considerably between substrates. We also examined the effect of K+ on substrate affinity and found that K+ enhanced substrate dissociation. A kinetic model was developed, which allowed for random, but cooperative, binding of substrate and Na+ (or K+). The synthetic data generated by this model recapitulated the experimental observations. More importantly, the cooperative binding model accounted for the releasing action of amphetamines without any digression from alternating access. To the best of our knowledge, this model is the first to provide a mechanistic framework for amphetamine-induced monoamine release and to account for the findings that some substrates are less efficacious than others in promoting the substrate-exchange mode.


2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-543
Author(s):  
Lingzhi Zhao ◽  
Zhao Li ◽  
Liu Zhao ◽  
Chenxiao Zhang
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. D12
Author(s):  
W. Maruyama ◽  
D. Nakahara ◽  
A. Takahashi ◽  
T. Nagatsu ◽  
M. Naoi

1989 ◽  
Vol 479 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Danysz ◽  
Jarda T. Wroblewski ◽  
Gary Brooker ◽  
Erminio Costa

1986 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg M. Rose ◽  
Greg A. Gerhardt ◽  
Gary L. Conboy ◽  
Barry J. Hoffer

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Freund ◽  
Craig G. Home ◽  
Timothy Harian ◽  
Michael R. Palmer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document