<p>The correct determination of reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>o</sub>) is fundamental for countless scientific and management applications such as closing the catchment water balance, the planning of irrigation schemes, and for simulation models. Nevertheless, the records of weather variables are often not available or incomplete. This usually happens when a sensor breaks or malfunctions due to severe weather conditions, lack of maintenance or electronic failure, which leads to data loss and consequently makes it hard to estimate ET<sub>o</sub>. Frequently, that is the case in mountain regions where meteorological sensors are subject to harsh environmental conditions as in the Andes. In case of missing data, the only solution is to estimate the required variable using a given equation. Therefore, these equations need to be calibrated to specific local conditions. The aim of this study was to calibrate and validate equations to estimate Solar Radiation (R<sub>s</sub>) on daily and monthly scales and to evaluate the impact of using these estimations for the calculation of ET<sub>o</sub> through the Penman Monteith (PM) equation in an Andean altitudinal gradient in the p&#225;ramo ecosystem. The p&#225;ramo occupies the upper portion of the northern Andes, where the tussock grasslands are the dominant vegetation. In addition, this ecosystem provides essential environmental services for inter-Andean cities. We used six years of observations (2013&#8211;2019) from the Quinoas Ecohydrological Observatory. This Observatory has four meteorological stations: Toreadora (3955 m a.s.l), Virgen Cajas (3626 m a.s.l), Chirimachay (3298 m a.s.l) and Balzay (2610 m a.s.l). We evaluated five models to estimate R<sub>s</sub> based on the maximum and minimum daily air temperature. A calibration was performed for each weather station and a simultaneous calibration for the entire gradient. We used four years of data for calibration and validation of the R<sub>s</sub> model, and two years to evaluate the impact on ET<sub>o</sub> calculations. We found that all models yielded estimations that are highly correlated with the observed data. However, no model was able to capture high R<sub>s</sub> values, greater than 185.4 W m<sup>-2</sup> (16 MJ m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>), found in cloud-free days. The best model to estimate R<sub>s</sub> was the locally calibrated Chen model, which showed a mean error of 2.9 W m<sup>-2 </sup>(0.25 MJ m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>). &#160;Estimated R<sub>s</sub> values reduced the estimation error of PM-ET<sub>o</sub> and, thus, allows its application for further studies.</p>
Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) Method for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Limited Data
