Post-disaster Trauma and Cultural Healing in Children and Adolescents: Evidence from the Wenchuan Earthquake

2021 ◽  
pp. 101878
Author(s):  
Dongmei Wang ◽  
Xiao You
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 4979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhao ◽  
Fanneng He ◽  
Caishan Zhao

Under the current resilience development framework, which is mainly based on urban communities, it is difficult to meet the needs of the vulnerable populations in poor villages. This article aims to explore a specific and operable guidance framework suitable for the resilient development of Chinese poor villages after disasters from the perspective of social equity. The framework will help guide the sustainable development of poor villages after disasters and also provide a reference for the resilience of other similar vulnerable areas. When integrating climate change response and disaster risk management to explore sustainable development in poor villages, the essence is to explore the resilience development framework focused on the construction of resilient communities in poor villages. We take the recovery and reconstruction of poor villages after the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 as an example. Through the analysis of the effects of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction, we found that although poor communities have made significant achievements since the earthquake, there are still many aspects that need to be improved, including social life systems, economic production systems, and natural ecosystems. Therefore, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of poor socio-economic conditions, the complex ecological environment, and the low cultural level of residents in poor villages. Furthermore, this study followed the principle of “Build back better” (BBB) and conducted an in-depth study of the framework for the resilience of poor villages. In terms of risk reduction, it is recommended to improve structural resilience from guarantee of preferential prices and selection of environmentally friendly materials, avoid risk and villagers’ participation in the formulation of general plans, and promote disaster prevention and mitigation capabilities from risk prediction and curriculum development. In terms of community recovery, it is suggested to promote community economics and victims’ livelihoods by promoting industrial transformation and sustainable livelihoods and promote social and psychological health development from social relations and psychological rehabilitation. In terms of efficient implementation, specific improvements include the improvement of public participation systems and the establishment of coordination offices and sound institutional mechanisms, the development of community standards and the introduction of financial support policies, the improvement of laws and regulations, and the improvement of monitoring and evaluation from dynamic monitoring and mass satisfaction surveys. It is important to guide the sustainable development of vulnerable communities by constructing a post-disaster resistant development framework based on BBB principles.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kezhi Liu ◽  
Xuemei Liang ◽  
Lanting Guo ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Xirong Li ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kezhi Liu ◽  
Xuemei Liang ◽  
Lanting Guo ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Xirong Li ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangxin Yi ◽  
Yong Tu

The Wenchuan earthquake, which happened in May 2008 in China, was one of the most destructive natural disasters of the past decade. The Chinese government implemented several aid programs, including the Paired Assistance to Disaster-Affected Areas (PADAA) program, to assist with disaster recovery. Although the Wenchuan earthquake has gained much scholarly attention, previous studies often adopted different recovery measures and provided fragmented empirical evidence on how an aid program may have influenced the recovery process in both the short and long term. To bridge the gap, this paper collects eight social, economic, and institutional indicators to measure four types of recovery processes, namely, economic recovery, social recovery, institutional recovery, and built environment recovery. The data, collected between 2002 and 2015, covers 269 earthquake-stricken counties. Based on this data, we constructed a set of disaster recovery indexes. We then evaluated the impacts of the PADAA program on the disaster recovery process across the 269 counties in both the short and long term. We concluded that the impact of the PADAA program on the post-disaster economic recovery was significant in both the short and long term, whereas its impact on the recovery of the institutional and built environment occurred in the short term. Its impact on post-disaster social recovery was inconclusive.


2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 1777-1782
Author(s):  
Jin Xiao

After the Wenchuan earthquake, a number of minority villages face many difficulties in relocation due to their poor geographical location, backward economic development and poor inhabited environment. In this paper, successful pattern for relocation of minority villages are researched and explored through analysis, generalization and summation with the post-disaster relocation of Yangliu Village in Taiping Township of Mao County as an example, in order to provide reference for the reconstruction of other minority villages stricken by the great disaster.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document