The prevalence of COVID-19 in healthcare personnel in an adult and pediatric academic medical center

Abstract: Objective: Presenteeism is an expensive and challenging problem in the healthcare industry. In anticipation of the staffing challenges expected with the COVID-19 pandemic, we examined a decade of payroll data for a healthcare workforce. We aimed to determine the effect of seasonal influenza-like illness (ILI) on absences to support COVID-19 staffing plans. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large academic medical center in the United States. Participants: Employees of the academic medical center who were on payroll between the years of 2009 and 2019. Methods: Biweekly institutional payroll data was evaluated for unscheduled absences as a marker for acute illness-related work absences. Linear regression models, stratified by payroll status (salaried vs hourly employees) were developed for unscheduled absences as a function of local ILI. Results: Both hours worked and unscheduled absences were significantly related to the community prevalence of influenza-like illness in our cohort. These effects were stronger in hourly employees. Conclusions: Organizations should target their messaging at encouraging salaried staff to stay home when ill.

Download Full-text

Implementation of an Enhanced Safety-Engineered Sharp Device Oversight and Bloodborne Pathogen Protection Program at a Large Academic Medical Center

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/678417 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 35 (11) ◽

pp. 1383-1390 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Thomas R. Talbot ◽

Deede Wang ◽

Melanie Swift ◽

Paul St. Jacques ◽

Susan Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Program Analysis ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Healthcare Personnel ◽

Safety Device ◽

Bloodborne Pathogens ◽

Academic Medical ◽

Online Submission ◽

Vanderbilt University ◽

Safe Practices

Objective.Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessaryDesign.Before-after program analysis.Setting.Large academic medical center.Interventions.Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program’s impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined.Results.Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program.Conclusions.An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.

Download Full-text

Real-world impact of vaccination on COVID-19 incidence in health care personnel at an academic medical center

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2021.336 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-21

Author(s):

Sarah E. Waldman ◽

Jason Y. Adams ◽

Timothy E. Albertson ◽

Maya M. Juárez ◽

Sharon L Myers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Medical Center ◽

Vaccination Campaign ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Vaccine Hesitancy ◽

Healthcare Personnel ◽

Frontline Employees ◽

Work Location ◽

Respiratory Therapists ◽

Academic Medical

Abstract Objective: COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness in healthcare personnel (HCP) has been established, however, questions remain about its performance in high-risk healthcare occupations and work locations. We describe the effect of a COVID-19 HCP vaccination campaign on SARS-CoV-2 infection by timing of vaccination, job type, and work location. Methods: A retrospective review of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, incidence of post-vaccination COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality among 16,156 faculty, students, and staff at a large academic medical center was conducted. Data were collected 8 weeks prior to the start of Phase 1a vaccination of frontline employees and ended 11 weeks after campaign completion. Results: COVID-19 employee incidence rate at our institution decreased from 3.2% during the 8 weeks prior to the start of vaccinations to 0.38% by four weeks after campaign initiation. SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was reduced among individuals receiving a single vaccination (HR = 0.52 [0.40, 0.68], p<0.0001) and further reduced with 2 doses of vaccine (HR = 0.17 [0.09, 0.32], p<0.0001). By two weeks after the second dose, the observed case positivity rate was 0.04%. Among Phase 1a HCP, we observed a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among physicians and a trend toward higher risk for respiratory therapists independent of vaccination status. Rates of infection were similar in a sub-group of nurses when examined by work location. Conclusions: Our findings show the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in HCP. Despite these encouraging results, unvaccinated HCP remain at an elevated risk of infection highlighting the need for targeted outreach to combat vaccine hesitancy.

Download Full-text

Occupational Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and Risk of Infection Among Healthcare Personnel

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2021.533 ◽

2022 ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Vishal P. Shah ◽

Laura E. Breeher ◽

Julie M. Alleckson ◽

David G. Rivers ◽

Zhen Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Occupational Exposure ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Occupational Exposures ◽

Healthcare Personnel ◽

Healthcare Settings ◽

Academic Medical ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Medium Risk ◽

The Impact

Abstract Objective: To assess the rate and factors associated with healthcare personnel (HCP) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 after an occupational exposure Design: Retrospective cohort study Setting: Academic medical center with sites in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Florida Subjects: HCP with a high or medium risk occupational exposure to a patient or other HCP with SARS-CoV-2 Methods: We reviewed the records of HCP with significant occupational exposures from March 20th, 2020 through December 31st, 2020. We then performed regression analysis to assess the impact of demographic and occupational variables to assess their impact on the likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 Results: A total of 2,253 confirmed occupational exposures occurred during the study period. Employees were the source for 57.1% of exposures. Overall, 101 (4.5%) HCP tested positive in the postexposure period. Of these, 80 had employee sources of exposure and 21 had patient sources of exposure. The post exposure infection rate was 6.2% when employees were the source, compared to 2.2% with patient sources. In a multivariate analysis, occupational exposure from an employee source had a higher risk of testing positive compared to a patient source (OR 3.22 95% CI (1.72-6.04)). Gender, age, high-risk exposure, and HCP role were not associated with increased risk of testing positive. Conclusions: The risk of acquiring COVID-19 following a significant occupational exposure is relatively low, even in the pre-vaccination era. Exposure to an infectious coworker carries a higher risk than exposure to a patient. Continued vigilance and precautions remain necessary in healthcare settings.

Download Full-text

Transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare personnel following unanticipated exposure to aerosol generating procedures: Experience from epidemiologic investigations at an academic medical center

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2021.472 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Sharon Fawcett ◽

Meghan Madhusudhan ◽

Emily Gaddam ◽

Matthew Almario ◽

Shawna Misah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Infection Rate ◽

Retrospective Review ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Transmission Risk ◽

Healthcare Personnel ◽

Risk Of Infection ◽

Eye Protection ◽

Academic Medical

Abstract Healthcare personnel (HCP) with unprotected exposures to aerosol generating procedures (AGP) on patients with COVID-19 are at risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2. A retrospective review at an academic medical center demonstrated a less than 1% infection rate among HCP involved in AGP without a respirator and/or eye protection.

Download Full-text