scholarly journals Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Robotic Arm Technology

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Micah MacAskill ◽  
Baylor Blickenstaff ◽  
Alexander Caughran ◽  
Matthew Bullock
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Utilization of Robotic Arm Assistance for Revision of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Steelman ◽  
Kyle Carlson ◽  
Andrew Ketner
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Keywords Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Introduction: With increasing numbers of knee arthroplasty procedures being performed, revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. The use of robotics in primary joint arthroplasty is also increasing due to better technology and surgeon familiarity. Robotic arms have the ability to execute bone cuts within 1 mm of a preoperative plan, can measure soft tissue gap tension, and can plan femoral and tibial augments and rotation. The use of robotic arm assistance for revision TKA, however, has not been documented in the literature. Case Report: We present a case describing a novel technique in which the Mako robot (Stryker, Ft. Lauderdale, FL) was utilized for revision of a failed primary TKA secondary to aseptic loosening. The patient is a 68-year-old Caucasian male who underwent right revision TKA with robotic assistance. Stryker Triathlon TS implants were utilized with the use of both femoral and tibial cones and medial and lateral posterior femoral augments. He had satisfactory component alignment based on postoperative radiographs, and excellent clinical outcomes 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: The use of robotic arm assistance in revision TKA for failed primary TKA is a novel technique and resulted in excellent operative outcomes in this case. Further study should be done to confirm its use in revision TKA. Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, robotic, revision, total knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake von Hintze ◽  
Mika Niemeläinen ◽  
Harri Sintonen ◽  
Jyrki Nieminen ◽  
Antti Eskelinen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs. Results The ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9–91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0–12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose. Conclusion We found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.

scholarly journals Correction to: Robotic‑arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junren Zhang ◽  
Wofhatwa Solomon Ndou ◽  
Nathan Ng ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Philip M. Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Improved Accuracy

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06522-x

Patellar Tracking in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Retaining a Patella From a Different Implant System Matter?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Yeroushalmi ◽  
Stephen Zak ◽  
Mohamad Sharan ◽  
Jenna A. Bernstein ◽  
Ran Schwarzkopf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellar Tracking ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Implant System

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 464 ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L Barrack ◽  
J Thomas McClure ◽  
Corey F Burak ◽  
John C Clohisy ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Review Article: Bone Defect Classifications in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yan Qiu ◽  
Chun Hoi Yan ◽  
Kwong Yuen Chiu ◽  
Fu Yuen Ng
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defect ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Total Knee
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document