Inter-rater reliability of descriptors for the classification of mucosal pressure injury: A prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND Perianal fistulas account for a substantial discomfort and morbidity to the patient thus affecting productive man hours and quality of life. Accurate pre-operative assessment of course of the primary fistulous track and secondary extension or abscesses is required for successful surgical management of anal fistulas. The purpose of this study was to diagnose and classify pre-operative perianal fistulas. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study at Department of Radiodiagnosis in a tertiary level hospital of southern Rajasthan from November 2018 to November 2020. The study included a total of 50 patients referred to department of radiology for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Statistical analysis was done using chi square test and student t test. RESULTS Out of these patients, 56 % were having secondary tract on MRI, 12 % patients were having abscess and 4 % were having horseshoe abscess on MRI. The commonest type of ano-rectal fistula encountered in the study was Grade -II seen in 32 %. CONCLUSIONS MRI is a highly accurate, rapid and non-invasive tool in pre-operative evaluation of the perianal and anal fistulas. MRI evaluation and classification of perianal fistulae has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy. The use of MRI for the diagnosis and classification of perianal fistula can provide reliable information which has both pre-operative and prognostic value. St James University Hospital classification, which is an MR imaging-based grading system for perianal fistula is very useful for effective radiological-surgical communication thus contributing to improved patient care and reduced rate of recurrence. KEYWORDS MR Fistulogram, Perianal Fistula, Anal Fistula, Fistula Classification, Fistulography

Download Full-text

Quality of life in adolescents with primary headaches

Paediatrica Indonesiana ◽

10.14238/pi53.6.2013.350-4 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 53 (6) ◽

pp. 350

Author(s):

Naomi Riahta ◽

Muhammad Ali ◽

Bistok Saing ◽

Yazid Dimyati ◽

Johannes Saing

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Primary Headaches ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Quality Oflife ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

The Mean ◽

Common Problems

Background Headaches are common problems in adults,adolescents, and children. Headaches impact a child's life, theirfamily life, and even society. An assessment of quality of life inadolescents with primary headaches may help to determine actionsnecessary to improve the quality of life of these patients.Objective To assess the quality oflife of adolescents with primaryheadach es compared to healthy adolescents.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in December2009 on adolescents aged 13 to 18 years. The headache groupconsisted of children with primary headaches according to theInternational Classification of Headache Disarders and the controlgroup consisted of healthy adolescents. Subjects were selected byconsecutive sampling, with 75 subjects in each group. Subjectsfilled the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventary version 4.0 (PedsQL4.0) questionnaire.Results The mean PedsQL total score was significantly lowerin the headache group than in the contra 1 group [ l 7 5. 7 vs.392.2, respectively, (95%CI of differences -28.l to -219.3, P =0.001)]. However, out of23 items in the questionnaire, 9 werenot significantly different between the headache and controlgroups.Conclusions Primary headaches in adolescents is associatedwith lower quality of life. Most quality of life domains scoresare significantly lower in adolescents with primary headachescompared to those without primary headaches.

Download Full-text