Overview on prediction, detection, and classification of atrial fibrillation using wavelets and AI on ECG

Author(s):  
Hassan Serhal ◽  
Nassib Abdallah ◽  
Jean-Marie Marion ◽  
Pierre Chauvet ◽  
Mohamad Oueidat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S575-S576
Author(s):  
Z. Mansuri ◽  
S. Patel ◽  
P. Patel ◽  
O. Jayeola ◽  
A. Das ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine trends and impact on outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with pre-existing psychosis.BackgroundWhile post-AF psychosis has been extensively studied, contemporary studies including temporal trends on the impact of pre-AF psychosis on AF and post-AF outcomes are largely lacking.MethodsWe used Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) from year's 2002–2012. We identified AF and psychosis as primary and secondary diagnosis respectively using validated international classification of diseases, 9th revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and used Cochrane–Armitage trend test and multivariate regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR).ResultsWe analyzed total of 3.887.827AF hospital admissions from 2002–2012 of which 1.76% had psychosis. Proportion of hospitalizations with psychosis increased from 5.23% to 14.28% (P trend < 0.001). Utilization of atrial-cardioversion was lower in patients with psychosis (0.76%v vs. 5.79%, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with Psychosis (aOR 1.206; 95%CI 1.003–1.449; P < 0.001) and discharge to specialty care was significantly higher (aOR 4.173; 95%CI 3.934–4.427; P < 0.001). The median length of hospitalization (3.13 vs. 2.14 days; P < 0.001) and median cost of hospitalization (16.457 vs. 13.172; P < 0.001) was also higher in hospitalizations with psychosis.ConclusionsOur study displayed an increasing proportion of patients with Psychosis admitted due to AF with higher mortality and extremely higher morbidity post-AF, and significantly less utilization of atrial-cardioversion. There is a need to explore reasons behind this disparity to improve post-AF outcomes in this vulnerable population.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mae'n Al-Dabbas ◽  
Jay Shah ◽  
devina adalja ◽  
Archana Gundabolu ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hypertension has been reported as one of the most common risk factor causing atrial fibrillation (AF). Also, hypertension is associated with more persistent AF. However the epidemiology for incidence of hypertensive emergency in AF hospitalization is not well documented. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that frequency of hypertensive emergency has been increasingly associated with Atrial fibrillation. Methods: National inpatient sample from 2005 -2015 was used for the present analysis. Patients over 18 years, with AF as the primary diagnosis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code, 427.31. Patients with hypertensive emergency were identified using ICD-9-CM code. 401.0, 402.0, 403.0, 404.0, 405.0. Results: A total of 4,988,269 AF patients over 18 years of age were included in the present analysis. Of these hospitalization 49,423 had hypertensive emergency during hospitalizations and the rest 4,938,846 had no hypertensive emergency. There was a monotonic increase in the trend of rates of hypertensive emergency per 1000 AF hospitalizations, from 2005 - 2015. (P value <0.001) [Figure 1]. Conclusion: There has been a significant increase in the rates of hypertensive emergency among AF hospitalization, over the past decade. Further research is needed to investigate the reason for this increased trend.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashank Shekhar ◽  
Anas M Saad ◽  
Toshiaki Isogai ◽  
Mohamed M Gad ◽  
Keerat Ahuja ◽  
...  

Introduction: Even though atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in >30% of patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it is not typically included in the decision-making algorithm for the timing or need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), either by transcatheter (TAVR) or surgical (SAVR) approaches. Large scale data on how AF affects outcomes of AS patients remain scarce. Methods: From the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), we retrospectively identified AS patients aged ≥18years, with and without AF admitted between January and June in 2016 and 2017 (to allow for a six month follow up), using the International Classification of Diseases-10 th revision codes. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the predictors of in-hospital mortality during index hospitalization. In-hospital complications and 6 month in-hospital mortality during any readmission after being discharged alive were compared in patients with and without AF, for patients undergoing TAVR, SAVR or no-AVR. Results: We identified 403,089 AS patients, of which 41% had AF. Patients with AF were older (median age in years: 83 vs. 79) and were more frequently females (52% vs. 48%; p<0.001). Table summarizes outcomes of AS patients with and without AF. TAVR in patients with AF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and follow-up mortality as compared to patients without AF. Although AF did not influence in-hospital mortality in SAVR population, follow-up mortality was also significantly higher after SAVR in patients with AF compared to patients without AF. For patients not undergoing AVR, in-hospital and follow-up mortality were higher in AF population compared to no AF and was higher than patients undergoing AVR (Table). Conclusions: AF is associated with worse outcomes in patients with AS irrespective of treatment (TAVR, SAVR or no-AVR). More studies are needed to understand the implications of AF in AS population and whether earlier treatment of AS in patients with AF can improve outcomes.


IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 110012-110022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Saiful Islam ◽  
Mohamed Maher Ben Ismail ◽  
Ouiem Bchir ◽  
Mohammed Zakariah ◽  
Yousef Ajami Alotaibi

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 2275-2285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giandomenico Nollo ◽  
Mattia Marconcini ◽  
Luca Faes ◽  
Francesca Bovolo ◽  
Flavia Ravelli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Demosthenes Katritsis ◽  
A John Camm

This chapter discusses the acute management of patients presenting with tachyarrhythmias suggestive of regular supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). A classification of narrow- and wide-QRS tachycardias is presented, and the differential diagnosis of narrow- and wide-QRS tachycardias is discussed. Principles of acute therapy are presented either in the context of acute therapy before establishing a definitive diagnosis or for particular arrhythmia entities with an established diagnosis of a regular SVT or AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document