Institutional development and firm risk from a dynamic perspective: Does ownership structure matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 342-357
Author(s):  
Anh-Tuan Le ◽  
Anh-Tuan Doan ◽  
Thu Phan
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Dynamic Perspective

scholarly journals Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2008-2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rilla Gantino
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Capital Intensity ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Risk Capital ◽  
Growth Opportunity ◽  
Size Firm

This study examine the influence of firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, leverage, tax, litigation, ownership structure, and growth opportunity for accounting conservatism.The study population was 129 manufacturing companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2009 and 2011. Based on purposive sampling method, 38 manufaturing companies was selected (or 114 observations). Data was selected from the companies’ financial reports and analysed by using multiple linear regression. This study uncovered that. the firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, leverage, tax, litigation, ownership structure, and growth opportunity have influence for accounting conservatism collectively. But, only firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, ownership structure and growth opportunity affect accounting conservatism individually in the studied companies

scholarly journals Akuntansi Konservatisme Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Agustina Agustina ◽  
Rice Rice ◽  
Stephen Stephen
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Capital Intensity ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Risk Capital ◽  
Growth Opportunity ◽  
Size Firm

This study examine the influence of firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, leverage, tax, litigation, ownership structure, and growth opportunity for accounting conservatism.The study population was 129 manufacturing companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2009 and 2011. Based on purposive sampling method, 38 manufaturing companies was selected (or 114 observations). Data was selected from the companies’ financial reports and analysed by using multiple linear regression. This study uncovered that. the firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, leverage, tax, litigation, ownership structure, and growth opportunity have influence for accounting conservatism collectively. But, only firm size, firm risk, capital intensity, ownership structure and growth opportunity affect accounting conservatism individually in the studied companies.

scholarly journals Corporate governance indicators and risk-taking

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-24
Author(s):  
Apostolos K. Apostolou ◽  
Maria-Eleni Agoraki
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Econometric Model ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Governance Indicators ◽  
The Relationship

This paper analyzes the relationship between risk-taking and corporate governance indicators, in terms of board characteristics, financial information quality and ownership structure. Unlike previous studies, we apply a broad range of corporate governance indicators and use a suitable econometric model to solve for possible endogeneity issues. The empirical framework is applied to an industry-wide sample of UK firms during the period 2002-2009. We find that board size and more executives positively affect firm risk-taking, while independence in audit committees has a negative impact. Finally, introducing firm specific characteristics does not affect the robustness of the results.

scholarly journals Corporate ownership structure and risk-taking: evidence from Japan

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
SunEae Chun ◽  
MinHwan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Pension Funds ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Concentrated Ownership ◽  
Corporate Risk

We examine the relationship between ownership structure and corporate risk-taking in Japan over the sample periods of 2000 2010. Reflecting the ongoing changes in the ownership structure in Japan, we incorporate the various kinds of insider and outsider ownership in the analysis. Ownership such as concentrated ownership, ownership by closely related parties, financial institutions comprising banks and insurance companies and managers are categorized into inside ownership, while ownership by foreigners or financial institution such as investment trusts or pension funds are categorized into outside ownership. The ownership structure is found to have a different impact on the firm’s risk-taking behavior. The study shows that concentrated ownership or ownership by closely related parties affect the firm risks in a convex manner and encourages the firm management to take more risk when the firms have growth opportunities. On the other hand, ownership by financial institutions such as bank and insurance companies, does not seem to affect the firm risk level. This implies that the financial institutions fail to play their role of a shareholder monitor. When managerial ownership is allowed, it is found that Japanese managers’ incentives are aligned with those of shareholders. Contrary to the conventional entrenchment hypothesis, however, managers seem to take more risk as the share of managerial ownership increases. Foreign investors are found to enhance corporate risk-taking in a monotonic manner and do not bias corporate investment in a conservative direction in pursuit of their short-term gains. Domestic institutions such as investment trusts or pension funds are found to neither affect the firm risk level nor enhance the firm value.

Impact of ownership structure and dividend on firm performance and firm risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1061
Author(s):  
Abhinav Kumar Rajverma ◽  
Arun Kumar Misra ◽  
Sabyasachi Mohapatra ◽  
Abhijeet Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Idiosyncratic Risk ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Family Control ◽  
Concentrated Ownership

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of ownership structure and dividend payouts over firm’s profitability, valuation and idiosyncratic risk. The authors further investigate if corporate performance is sector dependent. Design/methodology/approach The study employs signaling and bankruptcy theories to evaluate the influence of ownership structure and dividend payout over a firm’s corporate performance. The authors use a panel regression approach to measure the performance of family owned firms against that of widely held firms. Findings The study confines to firms operating out of emerging markets. The results show that family owned firms are dominant with concentrated ownership. The management pays lower dividend leading to lower valuation and higher idiosyncratic risk. The study further illustrates that family ownership concentration and family control both influence firm performance and level of risk. The findings indicate that information asymmetry and under diversification lead to increased idiosyncratic risk, resulting in the erosion of firm’s value. Results also confirm that firms paying regular dividends are less risky and, hence, command a valuation premium. Originality/value The evidence supports the proposition that information asymmetry plays a significant role in explaining dividend payouts pattern and related impacts on corporate performance. The originality of the paper lies in factoring idiosyncratic risk while explaining profitability and related valuation among emerging market firms.

INITIATIVE BUDGETING AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TERRITORIAL SELF-GOVERNMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-90
Author(s):  
V. V. Vagin ◽  
N. A. Shapovalova
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Citizen Participation ◽  
Institutional Analysis ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
State And Local Government ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Government Initiative ◽  
Local Levels

The article is devoted to the actual issue – institutional analysis of initiative budgeting and territorial public selfgovernment, as well as the possibility of their integration. Over the past few years, a system of civil participation in budget decisions has been built in Russia, the regulatory framework of practices has been created, thousands of employees of state and local government bodies have been trained, project centers have appeared for ensuring development of initiative budgeting. Citizen participation in budget decisions can significantly accelerate the development of the lower level of local government. Initiative budgeting is an innovative instrument of public finance and at the same time a social technology allowing for the real involvement of citizens in the issues of state and municipal governance. Initiative budgeting development programs make it possible to transfer financing of projects aimed at solving local issues with the participation of citizens onto a systemic basis. The results and materials of this study can serve a foundation for theoretical understanding of the institutional development of public finances at the regional and local levels. At the same time, this practical area that was intensively developing in recent years requires deep institutional analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document