Who benefits from Renewable Electricity? The differential effect of wind power development on rural counties in the United States

2022 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 102398
Author(s):  
Eman Ahmed Hamed Shoeib ◽  
Henry C. Renski ◽  
Elisabeth Hamin Infield
Author(s):  
Scott Valentine

Chapter 3 introduced a three-step framework that could be applied to case study analysis in order to extract insights for refining wind power development policy. The first step of the framework entailed the analysis of a sufficient number of national case studies to identify prominent commonalities that influence wind power development. In this book Germany, Denmark, China, the United States, Japan, and Canada were chosen as nations for analysis. Germany and Denmark—two nations that have laudable and sustained successes in wind power development—were selected in order to provide insight into successful wind power development policies. China and the United States, which have both experienced boom and bust periods of wind power development, were picked to provide insight into factors that cause such oscillations in development. Japan and Canada, which are two nations that have underperformed in regard to wind power development, were selected to provide insight into barriers to wind power diffusion. Although only six nations were included in this study, additional wind power policy analysis undertaken by the author in Australia and Taiwan provide general confirmation of the external validity of the findings that will be summarized in this chapter. In this chapter the social, technological, economic, and political (STEP) factors that emerged as influential for either supporting or impeding wind power development in the six case study nations will be summarized. The intention of this compendium is to provide policymakers and interested stakeholders with greater clarity regarding the factors that must be strategically managed in order to enhance the scale scope and pace of wind power diffusion. The factors introduced in this chapter should not be misconstrued as constituting a best practice list for optimizing wind power policy success. As was pointed out in the introductory chapter, energy policy is designed and implemented within a contextually unique environment that involves a seamless web of dynamically evolving forces. Consequently, the notion that it might be feasible to construct a universally applicable manual of best policy practice is a fool’s errand.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Bird ◽  
B. Parsons ◽  
T. Gagliano ◽  
M. Brown ◽  
R. Wiser ◽  
...  

Energy Policy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1397-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Bird ◽  
Mark Bolinger ◽  
Troy Gagliano ◽  
Ryan Wiser ◽  
Matthew Brown ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-347
Author(s):  
Jonas Grafström

China is currently the world’s largest installer of wind power. However, with twice the installed wind capacity compared to the United States in 2015, the Chinese produce less power. The question is: Why is this the case? This article shows that Chinese grid connectivity is low, Chinese firms have few international patents, and that export is low even though production capacity far exceeds domestic production needs. Using the tools of Austrian economics, China’s wind power development from 1980 to 2016 is documented and analyzed from three angles: (a) planning and knowledge problems, (b) unproductive entrepreneurship, and (c) bureaucracy and government policy. From a theoretical standpoint, both a planning problem and an entrepreneurial problem are evident where governmental policies create misallocation of resources and a hampering of technological development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document