Hepatic stellate cells are activated around central scars of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver—a potential mechanism of central scar formation

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunori Sato ◽  
Kenichi Harada ◽  
Hiroko Ikeda ◽  
Takahiko Fijii ◽  
Motoko Sasaki ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrique Donato ◽  
Luísa Andrade ◽  
Nina Bastati ◽  
Augusta Cipriano ◽  
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. They strongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease. The purpose of the present study was to describe the key imaging features of these lesions and compare them with a control arm of focal nodular hyperplasia.Material and Methods: A blinded consensus review of liver magnetic resonance consisting of 26 cases of multiacinar regenerative nodules and 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia was performed. Lesion size, shape, margins, structure, T1 and T2 signal intensity, diffusion and contrast-enhanced features (including hepatobiliary phase), presence of a central scar and of a peripheral hypointense rim were compared between the two groups.Results: Significant differences between multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia included size (median 2.35 cm, IQR: 2.13, vs 6.00 cm, IQR: 5.20, respectively, p < 0.001), presence of a peripheral hypointense rim after contrast (n = 9 vs n = 2 cases, p = 0.038) and of a central scar (n = 9 vs n = 20, p = 0.002). There were no other significant differences.Discussion: Overall multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia have very similar imaging features but lack of a central scar and presence of a hypointense rim should suggest a diagnosis of multiacinar regenerative nodules.Conclusions: Recognition of the imaging findings of multiacinar regenerative nodules can explain some atypical cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. They may also be the trigger to investigate an unsuspected underlying liver vascular abnormality.


2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 831-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOJI OGAWA ◽  
ICHIRO SAKAMOTO ◽  
TOSHIO FUKUDA ◽  
AAMER AZIZ ◽  
RASHID HASHMI ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Yamamoto ◽  
Shyunichi Ariizumi ◽  
Kenji Yoshitoshi ◽  
Akiko Saito ◽  
Masayuki Nakano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shingo YAMASHITA ◽  
Masakazu YAMAMOTO ◽  
Kenji YOSHITOSHI ◽  
Ken TAKASAKI

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib R. Karam ◽  
Sridhar Shankar ◽  
Padmaja Surapaneni ◽  
Young H. Kim ◽  
Sarwat Hussain

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyoshi Okamura ◽  
Hisaya Nakadate ◽  
Kazuo Ishida ◽  
Saori Nakahara ◽  
Yoshinori Isobe ◽  
...  

We report a case of congenital telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia, a rare variant form of the disease. The patient was a 2-month-old boy whose parents noticed abdominal distention about 2 weeks after birth, and ultrasonogram revealed a large mass in the liver. He underwent right lobectomy, and gross findings showed an ill-defined mass without any central scar. Histologic findings demonstrated proliferating hepatocytes without atypia arranged in cords of 1- or 2-cell thickness with marked sinusoidal dilatation and extramedullary hematopoiesis. In addition, a significantly increased Ki-67 labeling index in the tumor compared with non-tumor liver cells, and cytogenetic analysis of 23 G-banded metaphase preparations revealed 3 abnormal karyotypes, suggesting hyperplastic or neoplastic features. To the best of our knowledge, the present case is only the third documented case of congenital telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document