The Major Cat Allergen, Fel d 1, Is a Viable Target for CRISPR Gene Editing.

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. AB175
Author(s):  
Nicole Brackett ◽  
Anna Pomes ◽  
Martin Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Fel D 1 ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole F. Brackett ◽  
Anna Pomés ◽  
Martin D. Chapman

Genome engineering with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology offers the unique potential for unequivocally deleting allergen genes at the source. Compared to prior gene editing approaches, CRISPR boasts substantial improvements in editing efficiency, throughput, and precision. CRISPR has demonstrated success in several clinical applications such as sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia, and preliminary knockout studies of allergenic proteins using CRISPR editing show promise. Given the advantages of CRISPR, as well as specific DNA targets in the allergen genes, CRISPR gene editing is a viable approach for tackling allergy, which may lead to significant disease improvement. This review will highlight recent applications of CRISPR editing of allergens, particularly cat allergen Fel d 1, and will discuss the advantages and limitations of this approach compared to existing treatment options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. AB156
Author(s):  
Nicole Brackett ◽  
Julia Riedy ◽  
Mazhar Adli ◽  
Anna Pomes ◽  
Martin Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Fel D 1 ◽  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0132311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Ligabue-Braun ◽  
Liana Guimarães Sachett ◽  
Laércio Pol-Fachin ◽  
Hugo Verli
Keyword(s):  
Fel D 1 ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 105809
Author(s):  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Rosario Recacha ◽  
Lloyd W. Ruddock ◽  
Antti Moilanen

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M. Causer ◽  
Caroline L. Shorter ◽  
Roger D. Lewis ◽  
Robert W. Siebers
Keyword(s):  
Fel D 1 ◽  

Allergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 2694-2695
Author(s):  
Timothy B. Poole ◽  
Samuel Peter King ◽  
Cenk Suphioglu
Keyword(s):  
Fel D 1 ◽  

2006 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Siebers ◽  
Karen Oldfield ◽  
Julian Crane

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Krane ◽  
Yasuhiro Itagaki ◽  
Koji Nakanishi ◽  
Paul J. Weldon

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Norbäck ◽  
Gui-Hong Cai ◽  
Ivan Kreft ◽  
Gunilla Wieslander

<p><strong>PURPOSE:</strong> To study associations between cat, dog and horse allergens in day care centres and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) in serum, lung function (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and dyspnoea in day care centre staff. Totally 62 subjects, all females, from five Swedish day care centres participated (participation rate 90%).</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> Dust was collected by vacuum cleaning and Petri dish sampling and analysed for cat (Fel d 1), dog (Can f 1) and horse (Ecu cx) allergens by ELISA. Dyspnoea was measured on an analogue rating scale. FeNO, serum ECP and symptom ratings were log-transformed. Associations were analysed by linear mixed models, adjusting for personal and home environment factors.<em> </em></p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong><em> </em>Geometric mean (GM) value for allergens in vacuumed dust were 1199 ng/g for Fel d 1, 666 ng/g for Can f 1 and 478 U/g for Equ cx, respectively. GM value for allergens in Petri dish samples (ng/m<sup>2</sup> per day) was 29.8 for Fel d 1 and 9.1 for Can f 1, respectively. Cat allergen (Fel d 1) were positively associated with FeNO both in vacuumed dust (p=0.03) and in Petri dish samples (p=0.03). Dog allergen (Can f 1) in Petri dish samples was negatively associated with FeNO (p=0.02). Horse allergen (Equ cx) in vacuumed dust was negatively associated with FeNO (P=0.03).</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Cat, dog and horse allergens were commonly found and cat allergen in day care centres can be a risk factor for lower airway inflammation, measured as FeNO, while dog and horse allergens were associated with lower FeNO.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document