scholarly journals Robotic Surgery in Surgical Training: A Cross-sectional Study of Pan-Specialty Surgical Trainees

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. S230
Author(s):  
Christine A. Fleming ◽  
Joshua Burke
BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joshua Clements

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in dynamic changes to healthcare delivery. Surgery as a specialty has been significantly affected and with that the delivery of surgical training. Method This national, collaborative, cross sectional study comprising 13 surgical trainee associations distributed a pan surgical specialty survey on the COVID-19 impact on surgical training over a 4-week period (11th May - 8th June 2020). The survey was voluntary and open to medical students and surgical trainees of all specialties and training grades. All aspects of training were qualitatively assessed. This study was reported according to STROBE guidelines. Results 810 completed responses were analysed. (M401: F 390) with representation from all deaneries and training grades. 41% of respondents (n = 301) were redeployed with 74% (n = 223) redeployed > 4 weeks. Complete loss of training was reported in elective operating (69.5% n = 474), outpatient activity (67.3%, n = 457), Elective endoscopy (69.5% n = 246) with > 50% reduction in training time reported in emergency operating (48%, n = 326) and completion of work-based assessments (WBA) (46%, n = 309). 81% (n = 551) reported course cancellations and departmental and regional teaching programmes were cancelled without rescheduling in 58% and 60% of cases respectively. A perceived lack of Elective operative exposure and completions of WBA’s were the primary reported factor affecting potential training progression. Overall, > 50% of trainees (n = 377) felt they would not meet the competencies required for that training period. Conclusion This study has demonstrated a perceived negative impact on numerous aspects of surgical training affecting all training specialties and grades.


BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e007677-e007677 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. M. Ferguson ◽  
J. E. F. Fitzgerald ◽  
J. Reilly ◽  
A. J. Beamish ◽  
V. J. Gokani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ricky Ellis ◽  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Amanda J. Lee ◽  
Duncan S. G. Scrimgeour ◽  
Peter A. Brennan

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S105
Author(s):  
R.L. Harries ◽  
V.J. Gokani ◽  
P. Smitham ◽  
J.E.F. Fitzgerald

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Yousef Aldossary ◽  
Manal Alnaimi ◽  
Fatimah Almabyouq ◽  
Tlal Alsofyani ◽  
Akram AlJahdali ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Munro ◽  
W Minks ◽  
F Dowker

Abstract Aim Theatre experience is a powerful factor enabling trainees to determine whether they possess the enthusiasm and aptitude to undertake a surgical career. Removing barriers to theatre learning should allow a more meritorious and diverse cohort of surgical trainees. Method An 18 -point open and closed question Likert scale survey was distributed to Foundation Doctors in three hospitals within the Northern Deanery. The survey was designed via focus group and literature review, ascertaining perceived levels of preparedness, acceptance, enjoyment, and barriers to theatre access. Results The survey dichotomized respondents (n = 54) into those who attended theatre (n = 40) and those who did not (n = 14). Of those attending 38% (n = 15) reported intimidation and 15% (n = 6) cited a cultural barrier to attendance. Of those who did not attend 79% (n = 11) were interested in surgery. These respondents predominantly reported concerns around prohibitive ward workload and unfamiliarity with protocols. Covid restricted surgical rotations for some. There was a statistically significant difference (p fishers exact test = 0.001) between 83% of respondents who felt welcomed by the surgeons compared to just 45% made to feel welcome by the wider theatre team. Only 20% (n = 11) of respondents felt prepared for theatre by medical school. 50% (n = 27) were confident with theatre protocols. Conclusions The study raises concerns around apprehension surrounding the theatre environment and ward workload which appear to impede access to theatre. Adequate undergraduate surgical teaching, appropriate induction and allocation of theatre time are crucial to improve safety, diversity of applicants, confidence for trainees and compliance within the team.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document