Organizational legitimacy perception: Gender and uncertainty as bias for evaluation criteria

2022 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 426-436
Author(s):  
Francisco Díez-Martín ◽  
Giorgia Miotto ◽  
Gabriel Cachón-Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Organizational Legitimacy

Transformation of evaluation criteria of lands withdrawn from agricultural turnover due to radioactive contamination

2020 ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Olga Merzlova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Radioactive Contamination ◽  
Chernobyl Accident ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Contaminated Land ◽  
Degradation Processes ◽  
Agricultural Use ◽  
Land Clearance

One of the measures to eliminate the consequences of the Chernobyl accident was the exclusion of highly contaminated land from agricultural use. Due to the positive dynamics of the radiation situation, the issue of land return becomes relevant. However, in the period of exclusion of these lands the land clearance degradation processes were developing. The second part of the article is devoted to the issue of economic evaluation of the expediency of land return and the mutual coordination of the results of separate stages of complex ecological and economic evaluation. The research was carried out in Mogilev branch Institute of radiology (Republic of Belarus).

Performance Evaluation Criteria for Heat Exchangers Based on First Law Analysis

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yilmaz ◽  
O. Comakli ◽  
S. Yapici ◽  
O. N. Sara
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Evaluation Criteria

Objective Video Quality Method Based on Mutual Information and Human Visual System

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-152
Author(s):  
Michal Mardiak ◽  
Jaroslav Polec
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Information ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Human Visual System ◽  
Quality Evaluation ◽  
Video Quality ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Test Sequence ◽  
Quality Metric ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Video Quality Metric

Objective Video Quality Method Based on Mutual Information and Human Visual SystemIn this paper we present the objective video quality metric based on mutual information and Human Visual System. The calculation of proposed metric consists of two stages. In the first stage of quality evaluation whole original and test sequence are pre-processed by the Human Visual System. In the second stage we calculate mutual information which has been utilized as the quality evaluation criteria. The mutual information was calculated between the frame from original sequence and the corresponding frame from test sequence. For this testing purpose we choose Foreman video at CIF resolution. To prove reliability of our metric were compared it with some commonly used objective methods for measuring the video quality. The results show that presented objective video quality metric based on mutual information and Human Visual System provides relevant results in comparison with results of other objective methods so it is suitable candidate for measuring the video quality.

Practical consensus recommendations - Current role of immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria in the management of cancer patients receiving immunotherapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Purvish M. Parikh ◽  
T. P. Sahoo ◽  
Randeep Singh ◽  
Bahl Ankur ◽  
Talvar Vineet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Consensus Recommendation ◽  
Current Role ◽  
New Class ◽  
Response Evaluation Criteria

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) are a method used to evaluate and document the response to cancer treatment in solid tumors. The availability of a new class of immuneoncology drugs has resulted in the need to modify RECIST criteria methodology. The first leadership immuno-oncology network (LION) master course brought together experts in oncology and immuno-oncology. Six questions were put to the experts and their opinion, supporting evidence, and experience were discussed to arrive at a practical consensus recommendation. n this nascent field, the availability of a practical consensus recommendation developed by experts in the field is of immense value to the community oncologist and other health-care consultants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document