Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The DAK Foundation (Sydney) has facilitated pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repairs performed by local gynecologists for underprivileged women in Bangladesh and Nepal since 2014. Initially, there was no long-term patient follow-up. When 156 patients were examined at least 6 months after their surgery, an unacceptably high rate of prolapse recurrence and shortened vaginas was identified. This demonstrated the need for surgical up-skilling in both countries. Our hypothesis is that the introduction of a surgical training program in low-resource countries can significantly improve patient outcomes after pelvic floor surgery.
Methods
One-on-one surgical re-training was undertaken to up-skill the gynecologists in fascial vaginal repair and vaginal apical reconstruction utilizing sacrospinous fixation (SSF). Following the surgical up-skilling, a further 289 women (between 6 and 18 months post-operatively) were examined to determine patient outcomes. Outcome measures were:
Prolapse recurrence: POPQ (pelvic organ prolapse quantification [1]) ≥ stage 2
Vaginal length < 4 cm
Results
Prior to implementation of the surgical training program, 76% of patients had recurrent prolapse ≥ stage 2, and 56% had a vagina < 4 cm in length. Following the training program, prolapse recurrence was reduced to 45% with significant reductions in the apical, anterior and posterior compartments. The incidence of unacceptable vaginal shortening was 4%. We could not rely on patient symptoms to determine whether they had recurrences.
Conclusion
Clinical patient follow-up to determine surgical outcome is essential in low-resource settings. We have demonstrated that surgical up-skilling in vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal repair and introduction of SSF were necessary to achieve acceptable prolapse recurrence rates in our programs in Bangladesh and Nepal.
Short‑term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with apical compartment defect
