scholarly journals ”Medical Benefit” and Therapeutic Misconception: The Ethical Conundrum of Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Research

Author(s):  
D. Micah Hester ◽  
Lainie Friedman Ross
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gilger ◽  
Georgette Chammas ◽  
Samuel Maceri ◽  
Nancy K. West ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. e876-e883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Unguru ◽  
A. M. Sill ◽  
N. Kamani

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Aristizabal ◽  
Jenelle Singer ◽  
Renee Cooper ◽  
Kristen J. Wells ◽  
Jesse Nodora ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gilger ◽  
Georgette Chammas ◽  
Samuel Maceri ◽  
Nancy K. West ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Cuthbertson

AbstractIntroduction:This paper is a methodological reflection on the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) utilised in the context of a qualitative research project that explored perceptions and experiences of the journey to radiographer advanced practice.Methods and materials:A two-phase qualitative research explored the perceptions and experiences. Phase 1 reviewed reflective diaries (n = 12) kept during the educational phase of the practitioner journeys. Phase 2 included one-to-one, semi-structured interviews (n = 6) which were recorded, transcribed verbatim and reviewed using the IPA six-stage thematic analysis for practitioners embedded in the advanced practice role.Findings:Key themes arising from reflective diary analysis informed the interview content; and following interview transcription, data immersion and IPA, 12 emergent sub-themes generated 3 superordinate themes.Discussion:Theoretical perspectives and application of the methodology are discussed. The phenomenological and interpretative qualities of IPA have the potential to provide unique and valuable insights into lived experiences of individuals. It is hoped that this researchers’ reflections are transferrable for those interested in employing a qualitative methodology for radiotherapy and oncology research.Conclusion:Therapeutic radiographers work within rapidly changing environments from technological, treatment and care perspectives. With continued development and change, the impact of research utilising an IPA methodology may allow exploration of perceptions and experiences from a range of key stakeholders with the potential to increase the research base.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
A F Patenaude ◽  
L Basili ◽  
D L Fairclough ◽  
F P Li

PURPOSE To assess attitudes toward testing for cancer susceptibility genes, we interviewed mothers of pediatric oncology patients about their cancer causation theories, interest in hypothetical predisposition testing for themselves and their healthy children, and anticipated impact of testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS The subjects were 47 mothers of two or more living children, one of whom was 6 to 24 months postdiagnosis of cancer. Potential risks and benefits of hypothetical genetic predisposition testing for cancer susceptibility were described. A semistructured interview assessed the following: (1) recall of discussions with the pediatric oncologist about the possible role of heredity in causing the child's cancer; (2) mothers' personal theories of the etiology of their child's cancer; (3) family cancer history; (4) interest in genetic predisposition testing for themselves and unaffected (cancer-free) children; and (5) expected sequelae of testing. RESULTS If genetic cancer predisposition tests were available, 51% of mothers would test themselves and 42% would test healthy children, even with no medical benefit. With established medical benefit, an additional 36% of mothers would seek testing for themselves and another 49% would test their healthy children. Interest in cancer predisposition testing among mothers extended far beyond those with significant family histories of cancer. Most mothers would consider minor children's wishes in the decision about testing and would tell children under age 18 their test results. CONCLUSION As increasing numbers of cancer susceptibility genes are identified, parents of pediatric oncology patients may be receptive to opportunities to test themselves and their healthy children. Counseling will be important to aid in decisions about testing. Research is essential to evaluate the long-term impact of predisposition testing.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940
Author(s):  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Nisreen A. Haideri ◽  
Georg Hess ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (18) ◽  
pp. 4571-4578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca D. Pentz ◽  
Margaret White ◽  
R. Donald Harvey ◽  
Zachary Luke Farmer ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Thomas A Ollila ◽  
James Butera ◽  
Pamela C Egan ◽  
John L Reagan ◽  
Anthony G Thomas ◽  
...  

Background: The combination of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) is frequently used as treatment for indolent B-cell lymphomas (iBCL; Rummel et al, Lancet 2013; Olszewski et al, Am J Hematol 2019). Its relatively low adverse effect profile and lack of overlapping toxicities suggest the potential for adding vincristine - another highly active anti-lymphoma agent. However, a prior trial found high rates of thrombocytopenia when standard vincristine was combined with full-dose bendamustine (Herold M, et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006). VSLI is a liposome-encapsulated formulation of vincristine designed to improve its activity, therapeutic index, and pharmacokinetic profile. VSLI at an uncapped dose of 2.0 mg/m2 has been successfully combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Hagemeister et al., Br J Haematol 2013). The objective of this phase 1 study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of VSLI in combination with standard doses of BR for treatment of iBCL. Methods: Patients with iBCL otherwise appropriate for BR therapy were eligible for this phase 1 study. Bendamustine was given at 90 mg/m2 on Day 1, 2, and rituximab at 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle, for 6 cycles. VSLI was given on Day 2 of each cycle at a patient-specific dose ranging from 1.8 mg/m2 up to maximum 2.3 mg/m2, as determined by the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) model-based design (Babb et al., Stat Med, 2001). EWOC allows for rapid identification of the MTD using a small sample size and single-subject dose cohorts. Model parameters for this study included target probability of DLT (q) of 0.33 and starting probability of exceeding MTD (a) of 0.25. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Simulations indicated that n=10 subjects would be sufficient to determine the MTD, and this sample size was set for the study by design. MTD was defined as median of the Bayesian 95% confidence interval (CI) for the VSLI dose, calculated from the model at the end of the study. DLT was defined during cycle 1 only, as grade (G) 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days (or G3 with fever / infection), G4 thrombocytopenia (or G3 requiring transfusion), or any G3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Secondary objectives included cumulative rates of adverse effects (AE, particularly VSLI-related neuropathy), completion rate of 6 cycles of therapy, overall response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR) rate. This study (BrUOG-326) was conducted by Brown University Oncology Research Group (BrUOG) and registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02257242. Results: Ten patients received BR+VSLI as first-line therapy. The VSLI dose was escalated from 1.80 to 2.24 mg/m2 (see Table). Median age was 59.5 years; there were 6 (60%) women. Patients had follicular (n=4), marginal zone (n=3), mantle cell (n=2), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=1). There was 1 observed DLT (G3 ileus) at VSLI dose 2.04 mg/m2. So far, six patients have completed 6 cycles of BR+VSLI, while two discontinued VSLI and continued on 6 cycles with BR alone (one for DLT in cycle 1, and one for G2 neuropathy after cycle 3). The most common AE included lymphopenia (100%), constipation (60%), nausea, infusion reaction, neutropenia (each 50%), and peripheral neuropathy (40%). The only G3/4 AE were lymphopenia (90%), neutropenia (20%) and ileus (10%). Four patients developed neuropathy: two G1 and two G2. Only one patient (10%) had treatment-related rash (G2 during cycle 5). Using data from all 10 subjects, the MTD for VSLI in combination with BR was estimated to be 2.25 mg/m2 (Bayesian 95% CI, 2.00-2.40 mg/m2). All patients who completed therapy (n=8) achieved a response, with 50% achieving CR at the end of therapy (i.e. after 6 cycles of BR+VSLI or BR if VSLI was discontinued early). With median follow-up 18 months (range, 2-29), one patient experienced recurrence of a blastoid mantle cell lymphoma, while others remain in remission (see Figure). Estimated 2-year progression-free survival is 80.0% (95% CI, 20.4-96.9%), and all patients remain alive. Conclusions: VSLI at 2.25 mg/m2 can be safely combined with BR as first-line treatment for iBCL. In this study, the efficient phase 1 EWOC design enabled MTD determination for VSLI in a small cohort. Considering low rate of G3/4 toxicity, BR+VSLI may provide a platform for further combinations in treatment of B-cell lymphomas (including with an anthracycline for aggressive NHL). Disclosures MacKinnon: Brown University Oncology Research Group: Current Employment. Margolis:Brown University Oncology Research Group: Current Employment. Olszewski:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Vincristine sulfate liposome injection (Marqibo) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosomeâ€'negative (Phâ€') acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second or greater relapse or whose disease has progressed following 2 or more anti-leukemia therapies. Bendamustine is indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2068-2068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela S. Becker ◽  
Elihu Estey ◽  
Stephen Petersdorf ◽  
Barry E Storer ◽  
Frederick R Appelbaum

Abstract Abstract 2068 Poster Board II-45 Background: Clofarabine is active in both relapsed and newly diagnosed AML. Clofarabine in combination with ara-C at a dose of 1 g/m2 daily for 5 days resulted in 52% complete remission (CR) in newly diagnosed patients age 50 or older. (Faderl et al Blood 108:45, 2006), Addition of low dose cytarabine (ara-C) improved efficacy as compared to clofarabine alone in untreated patients age 60 or older (Faderl et al Blood 112:1638, 2008). As high dose ara-C has considerable efficacy in AML, we combined clofarabine with higher dose ara-C (HiDAc) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming for patients with relapsed AML or AML that failed to respond to initial therapy. GCLAC is based on the FLAG regimen, substituting clofarabine for fludarabine, given the former's greater anti-AML effect. Methods: We initially conducted a phase 1 trial in 19 pts and identified 25 mg/m2 daily days 1-5 as the MTD of clofarabine when combined with ara-C 2 g/m2 daily days 1-5 and G-CSF 5 mcg/kg subcutaneously, beginning 1 day before chemotherapy and continuing daily until neutrophil recovery. A phase 2 expansion was then conducted at the MTD. Results: We have treated 38 patients (pts), age range 19-66 years, median 51, 22 at the MTD. Twenty pts received GCLAC as 1st salvage, 15 at the MTD. Seven of the 20 had relapsed after a median 1st CR duration of 6 mos while 13 had not responded to initial 3+7 induction therapy, including 4 who were refractory to > 1 course. The CR rate for all patients or all patients at the MTD was 45% and the CR +CRp rate at the MTD was 64%. These rates are 50% CR (95%CI 27-73%) and 65% CR+CRp among 1st salvage pts (95% CI 41-85%), respectively, and 70% CR + CRp excluding pts who relapsed after allogeneic SCT. Median time to neutrophil recovery (ANC>500) was 21 days (range 13 to 39), and to platelet recovery (platelet count >100,000), 29 days (range 21-42). Four of 22 pts had serious infections and/or asymptomatic grade 3 LFT elevations, a rate not in excess of that seen with other ara-C-containing salvage therapies. Sixty percent of the first salvage patients had poor risk cytogenetics, and 80% of CRs were observed after the first course of therapy. Median overall survival was 7.4 months, and event free survival, 4.3 months. Using a prognostic model that derives expected CR rates with HiDAc or FLAG based on 1st CR duration and number of prior salvage therapies (Blood 1996;88:756), the ratio of observed (with GCLAC) to expected CR was 2.5:1. Conclusion: Based on its efficacy, formal comparisons of GCLAC with other salvage regimens are warranted and the combination should also be investigated in untreated pts. Disclosures: Becker: Genzyme Oncology: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Clofarabine is approved for relapsed or refractory pediatric ALL .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document