RETAINED INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER FRAGMENT AT REMOVAL OF IMPLANTABLE VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE: INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS, AND OUTCOMES

Author(s):  
Joseph Rassam ◽  
Georgina Bough ◽  
Go Ito ◽  
William Mullins ◽  
Anna-May Long
2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-002917
Author(s):  
So Yeon Yoon ◽  
Gyeong Sik Jeon ◽  
Sanghoon Jung

ObjectivesTo determine risk factors for catheter survival and complications after image-guided implantation of a totally implanted vascular access device (TIVAD).MethodsA total of 2883 TIVADs (2735 patients, 63.5±13 years old, 1060 men, 1675 women) implanted under guidance by ultrasound and fluoroscopy in our institution from January 2010 to December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. We used the log rank test and logistic regression to analyse risk factors associated with catheter survival and complications.ResultsFemale patients (n=1778; 61.7%; mean catheter survival days: 780.6 days) and those with a haematological malignancy (n=277; 10.1%; mean catheter survival days: 1019 days) had significantly better catheter survival than male patients (n=1105; 38.3%; mean catheter survival days: 645.9 days) and those with a solid organ malignancy (n=2447; 89.5%; mean catheter survival days: 701 days) (p<0.001 and p=0.003). Patients with haematological malignancies and benign vascular inflammatory disease (n=11; 0.4%) were vulnerable to infection (n=96; 3.3%) (p<0.001 and p=0.004). Thrombotic malfunction (n=38; 1.3%) was significantly more common in females than males (p=0.005). Non-thrombotic malfunction (n=16; 0.6%) showed a significant association with left positioning of the TIVAD (n=410; 14.2%) (p=0.043). Wound dehiscence (n=3; 0.1%) was significantly more frequent in punctured veins other (n=23; 0.8%) than the internal jugular vein (p<0.001).ConclusionsIncreased attention should be paid to patients with an underlying haematological malignancy, underlying vascular inflammatory disease, female patients, older patients, those accessed via a vein other than the IJV, those with left positioning of the TIVAD system or those with a prolonged TIVAD maintenance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. S28-S33
Author(s):  
Andrew Barton

The use of sutureless, adhesive securement devices in vascular access has become recommended as best practice, because they are a cost-effective, reliable solution. After a vascular access device has been inserted, catheter securement is one of the most important aspects of care and maintenance. The Grip-Lok® range offers secure, comfortable adhesive securement for all types of vascular access devices. The products use hypoallergenic medical adhesive, which reduces the risk of skin irritation and provides a reliable, adaptable alternative to suturing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. S4-S12
Author(s):  
Rose McGuire ◽  
Ellen Norman ◽  
Iain Hayden

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Cawcutt ◽  
Richard J. Hankins ◽  
Teresa A. Micheels ◽  
Mark E. Rupp

AbstractThis narrative review addresses vascular access device choice from peripheral intravenous catheters through central venous catheters, including the evolving use of midline catheters. The review incorporates best practices, published algorithms, and complications extending beyond CLABSI and phlebitis to assist clinicians in navigating complex vascular access decisions.


Transfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 3461-3467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Gray ◽  
Isabella G. Steidley ◽  
Hollie L. Benson ◽  
Christine L. Pearce ◽  
Amy M. Bachman ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-285
Author(s):  
S.W. Choi ◽  
K.W. Nam ◽  
J.C. Lee ◽  
K.H. Yoon ◽  
J.C. Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document