Determining journal article citation classics in school psychology: An updated bibliometric analysis using Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science

Citation frequencies represent the most significant contributions in any respective field. This bibliometric analysis aimed to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited publications in the field of antibiotics and to highlight the trends of research in this field. “All databases” of Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science was used to identify and analyze the 100 publications. The articles were then cross-matched with Scopus and Google Scholar. The frequency of citation ranged from 940 to 11051 for the Web of Science, 1053 to 10740 for Scopus, and 1162 to 20041 for Google Scholar. Five hundred thirteen authors made contributions to the ranked list, and Robert E.W. Hancock contributed in six articles, which made it to the ranked list. Sixty-six scientific contributions originated from the United States of America. In contrast, five publications were linked to the University of Manitoba, Canada, that was identified as the educational organization, which made the most contributions (n=5). According to the methodological design, 26 of the most cited works were review-type closely followed by 23 expert opinions/perspectives. Eight articles were published in Nature journal, making it the journal with the most scientific contribution in this field. Correlation analysis between the publication age and citation frequency was found statistically significant (P = .012).

Download Full-text

Bibliometric analysis of a controversial paper on predatory publishing

Performance Measurement and Metrics ◽

10.1108/pmm-03-2020-0015 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 39-47

Author(s):

Panagiotis Tsigaris ◽

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keyword(s):

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Design Methodology ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Scholarly Publishing ◽

Google Scholar ◽

Global Media ◽

Content Type ◽

University Of Toronto ◽

Predatory Publishing ◽

Journal Impact

PurposeIn 2017, one study (Derek Pyne; Journal of Scholarly Publishing; DOI: 10.3138/jsp.48.3.137; University of Toronto Press) in the “predatory” publishing literature attracted global media attention. Now, over three years, according to adjusted Google Scholar data, with 53 citations (34 in Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science), that paper became that author's most cited paper, accounting for one-third of his Google Scholar citations.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of the authors who cited that paper.FindingsWe found that out of the 39 English peer-reviewed journal papers, 11 papers (28%) critically assessed Pyne's findings, some of which even refuted those findings. The 2019 citations of the Pyne (2017) paper caused a 43% increase in the Journal of Scholarly Publishing 2019 Journal Impact Factor, which was 0.956, and a 7.7% increase in the 2019 CiteScore.Originality/valueThe authors are of the opinion that scholars and numerous media that cited the Pyne (2017) paper were unaware of its flawed findings.

Download Full-text

Antibiotics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Classics

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics9050219 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 219

Author(s):

Anas Imran Arshad ◽

Paras Ahmad ◽

Mohmed Isaqali Karobari ◽

Jawaad Ahmed Asif ◽

Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Web Of Science ◽

The United States ◽

Google Scholar ◽

Expert Opinions ◽

Respective Field ◽

University Of Manitoba ◽

Field Correlation ◽

The University ◽

Ranked List

Citation frequencies represent the most significant contributions in any respective field. This bibliometric analysis aimed to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited publications in the field of antibiotics and to highlight the trends of research in this field. “All databases” of Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science was used to identify and analyze the 100 publications. The articles were then cross-matched with Scopus and Google Scholar. The frequency of citation ranged from 940 to 11,051 for the Web of Science, 1053 to 10,740 for Scopus, and 1162 to 20,041 for Google Scholar. A total of 513 authors made contributions to the ranked list, and Robert E.W. Hancock contributed in six articles, which made it to the ranked list. Sixty-six scientific contributions originated from the United States of America. Five publications were linked to the University of Manitoba, Canada, that was identified as the educational organization, made the most contributions (n = 5). According to the methodological design, 26 of the most cited works were review-type closely followed by 23 expert opinions/perspectives. Eight articles were published in Nature journal, making it the journal with the most scientific contribution in this field. Correlation analysis between the publication age and citation frequency was found statistically significant (p = 0.012).

Download Full-text

Scientometrics: Tools, Techniques and Software for Analysis

Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services ◽

10.51983/ijiss.2019.9.2.611 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 116-121

Author(s):

V. Jayasree ◽

M. D. Baby

Keyword(s):

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Literature Search ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Software Tools ◽

Google Scholar ◽

Scientometric Analysis ◽

Citation Networks ◽

Publish Or Perish ◽

Vos Viewer ◽

Productive Method

This paper aims to discuss the significance of e-resources on scientometrics study. Tools for scientometric analysis are listed out. Data collected from literature search and website of softwares. Citation tracking tools like Web of science, Scopus and Google Scholar citations, CiteseerX etc., are discussed. Various software tools for bibliometric analysis like Bibexcel, CiteSpace, Histcite, Pajek, Publish or Perish, Scholarometer, VOS viewer-tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks, CitNet explorer – tool for visualizing and analysing citation networks of publications etc are discussed, The study concludes that combination of different software tools can be used for complete scientometric analysis and the familiarization of bibliometric software among students and researchers will help to promote research in scientometrics in a more productive method.

Download Full-text

Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science–Indexed Papers on Concrete Segmental Bridges

PCI Journal ◽

10.15554/pcij60.1-05 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 60 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

José R. Martí-Vargas ◽

Emili García-Taengua ◽

W. Micah Hale ◽

Mohamed K. ElBatanouny ◽

Paul H. Ziehl

Keyword(s):

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Segmental Bridges

Download Full-text

Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Sustainability ◽

10.3390/su13137102 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (13) ◽

pp. 7102

Author(s):

Ana Carolina V. Nadalini ◽

Ricardo de Araujo Kalid ◽

Ednildo Andrade Torres

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Ecosystem Services ◽

Natural Resources ◽

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Evaluation Methodology ◽

Review Of The Literature ◽

Ecological Aspects ◽

Valuation Of Ecosystem Services ◽

Emergy Evaluation

The objective of this paper is to present a review of current research on the valuation of ecosystem services, using emergy evaluation methodology (EME). A bibliometric analysis and a systematic review were carried out between 2000 and 2020, using all of Web of Science database subfields that collected 187 papers, selected through the keywords “emergy” and “ecosystem services”. In the second part of the research, we carried out a new search on Web of Science of the 187 initial articles produced, with the words “valuation” and “economic”, in order to analyze those directly related to the evaluation of ecosystem services. The results showed that the EME method is an effective tool to evaluate ecosystem services, since it relates economic and ecological aspects in the evaluations. The research also indicated that the use of isolated methods does not appear to be the most appropriate solution, and that emergy used in combination with other methodologies can be used to obtain more accurate and comprehensive results to evaluate natural resources.

Download Full-text