scholarly journals Depression Screening in Adolescents: Implications for Primary Care Nurse Practitioners

Author(s):  
Leslie L. Davis ◽  
Madina Leon
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Clark ◽  
Kathleen A. Kent ◽  
Richard D. Jackson

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-327
Author(s):  
Donald Gardenier ◽  
Joyce Knestrick ◽  
Cynthia Edwards-Tuttle

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 658-659
Author(s):  
Donald Gardenier ◽  
Lindsay Maxwell ◽  
Lili Cargill

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Perloff ◽  
Sean Clarke ◽  
Catherine M. DesRoches ◽  
Monica O’Reilly-Jacob ◽  
Peter Buerhaus

Context: State scope of practice (SoP) laws impose significant restrictions on the services that a nurse practitioner (NP) may provide in some states, yet evidence about SoP limitations on the quality of primary care is very limited. Method: This study uses six different classifications of state regulations and bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare beneficiaries attributed to primary care nurse practitioners and primary care physicians in 2013 testing two hypotheses: (1) chronic disease management, cancer screening, preventable hospitalizations, and adverse outcomes of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners are better in reduced and restricted practice states compared to states without restrictions and (2) by decreasing access to care, SoP restrictions negatively affect the quality of primary care. Findings: Results show a lack of consistent association between quality of primary care provided by NPs and state SoP restrictions. Conclusion: State regulations restricting NP SoP do not improve the quality of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document