Check Only Once? Health Information Exchange between Competing Private Hospitals

Omega ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 102556
Author(s):  
Baozhuang Niu ◽  
Haotao Xu ◽  
Zhipeng Dai
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100241
Author(s):  
Job Nyangena ◽  
Rohini Rajgopal ◽  
Elizabeth Adhiambo Ombech ◽  
Enock Oloo ◽  
Humphrey Luchetu ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe use of digital technology in healthcare promises to improve quality of care and reduce costs over time. This promise will be difficult to attain without interoperability: facilitating seamless health information exchange between the deployed digital health information systems (HIS).ObjectiveTo determine the maturity readiness of the interoperability capacity of Kenya’s HIS.MethodsWe used the HIS Interoperability Maturity Toolkit, developed by MEASURE Evaluation and the Health Data Collaborative’s Digital Health and Interoperability Working Group. The assessment was undertaken by eHealth stakeholder representatives primarily from the Ministry of Health’s Digital Health Technical Working Group. The toolkit focused on three major domains: leadership and governance, human resources and technology.ResultsMost domains are at the lowest two levels of maturity: nascent or emerging. At the nascent level, HIS activities happen by chance or represent isolated, ad hoc efforts. An emerging maturity level characterises a system with defined HIS processes and structures. However, such processes are not systematically documented and lack ongoing monitoring mechanisms.ConclusionNone of the domains had a maturity level greater than level 2 (emerging). The subdomains of governance structures for HIS, defined national enterprise architecture for HIS, defined technical standards for data exchange, nationwide communication network infrastructure, and capacity for operations and maintenance of hardware attained higher maturity levels. These findings are similar to those from interoperability maturity assessments done in Ghana and Uganda.


2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1672-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Furukawa ◽  
Jennifer King ◽  
Vaishali Patel ◽  
Chun-Ju Hsiao ◽  
Julia Adler-Milstein ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Ross ◽  
B. K. Mellis ◽  
B. L. Beaty ◽  
L. M. Schilling ◽  
A. J. Davidson ◽  
...  

SummaryObjective: Assess the interest in and preferences of ambulatory practitioners in HIE.Background: Health information exchange (HIE) may improve the quality and efficiency of care. Identifying the value proposition for smaller ambulatory practices may help those practices engage in HIE.Methods: Survey of primary care and specialist practitioners in the State of Colorado.Results: Clinical data were commonly (always [2%], often [29%] or sometimes [49%]) missing during clinic visits. Of 12 data types proposed as available through HIE, ten were considered “extremely useful” by most practitioners. “Clinical notes/consultation reports,” “diagnosis or problem lists,” and “hospital discharge summaries” were considered the three most useful data types. Interest in EKG reports, diagnosis/problem lists, childhood immunizations, and discharge summaries differed among ambulatory practitioner groups (primary care, obstetrics-gynecology, and internal medicine subspecialties).Conclusion: Practitioners express strong interest in most of the data types, but opinions differed by specialties on what types were most important. All providers felt that a system that provided all data types would be useful. These results support the potential benefit of HIE in ambulatory practices.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 604-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-il Lee ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Jeong-Whun Kim ◽  
Hee Hwang ◽  
Eun-Young Cho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document