RU 24969-produced adipsia and hyperlocomotion: Differential role of 5HT1A and 5HT1B receptor mechanisms

2014 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dane Aronsen ◽  
Jeremy Webster ◽  
Susan Schenk
Keyword(s):  
Ru 24969 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dane Aronsen

<p>Rationale: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a less efficacious reinforcer than other drugs of abuse. However, following repeated self-administration, responding increases for some animals and efficacy becomes comparable to other drugs of abuse. MDMA-stimulated serotonin (5-HT) release was negatively associated with acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and a neurotoxic 5-HT lesion reduced the latency to acquire self-administration. These findings suggest that MDMA-produced 5-HT release is an important component of self-administration. The receptor mechanisms are not, however, well understood, although it has often been suggested that the mechanism involves 5-HT-mediated inhibition of dopamine. Both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors are well localised to regulate dopamine release, and both have been implicated in modulating the reinforcing effects of many drugs of abuse.   Objectives: The first objective was to establish specific behavioural assays to reflect 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation. Then, using the established behavioural assays, the aim was to determine the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. The impact of substantial MDMA self-administration on 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors was also assessed.  Methods: Firstly, dose-effect relationships for the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) and the hyperactive and adipsic response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) were determined. Selectivity of these responses was determined by co-administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, or the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR 127935. Secondly, a pretreatment regimen of the RU 24969 (2 × 3.0 mg/kg/day, 3 days), which had been suggested to down-regulate 5-HT1B/1A receptors, was administered prior to self-administration testing. The effect of this manipulation on both the acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and the behavioural responses to 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation, was measured. A further study measured behavioural responses to 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor agonists prior to self-administration, to determine whether the variability in these responses would predict the variability in the latency to acquisition of MDMA self-administration. Lastly, the effect of substantial MDMA self-administration (350 mg/kg) on dose-response curves for the behavioural effects of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor activation was assessed.   Results: The hyperactive response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969, was blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, but not the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, GR127935. Similarly, the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, was dose-dependently blocked by WAY 100635. GR 127935, but not WAY 100635, blocked the adipsic response to RU 24969. Repeated administration of RU 24969 produced rightward shifts in the dose-response curves for 8-OH-DPAT-produced hyperactivity and RU 24969-produced adipsia, and also greatly facilitated the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. However, there was no correlation between latency to acquire MDMA self-administration and the hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT or the adipsic response to RU 24969, and MDMA self-administration failed to alter these behavioural response to activation of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors.   Conclusions: The hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT and the adipsic response to RU 24969 reflect activation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, respectively. The variability in acquisition of MDMA self-administration was reduced by a treatment that also down-regulated 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, however there was no further indication that these receptors play a critical role in the self-administration of MDMA. Instead, it seems likely that other 5-HT receptors have a greater impact on MDMA self-administration.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dane Aronsen

<p>Rationale: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a less efficacious reinforcer than other drugs of abuse. However, following repeated self-administration, responding increases for some animals and efficacy becomes comparable to other drugs of abuse. MDMA-stimulated serotonin (5-HT) release was negatively associated with acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and a neurotoxic 5-HT lesion reduced the latency to acquire self-administration. These findings suggest that MDMA-produced 5-HT release is an important component of self-administration. The receptor mechanisms are not, however, well understood, although it has often been suggested that the mechanism involves 5-HT-mediated inhibition of dopamine. Both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors are well localised to regulate dopamine release, and both have been implicated in modulating the reinforcing effects of many drugs of abuse.   Objectives: The first objective was to establish specific behavioural assays to reflect 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation. Then, using the established behavioural assays, the aim was to determine the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. The impact of substantial MDMA self-administration on 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors was also assessed.  Methods: Firstly, dose-effect relationships for the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) and the hyperactive and adipsic response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) were determined. Selectivity of these responses was determined by co-administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, or the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR 127935. Secondly, a pretreatment regimen of the RU 24969 (2 × 3.0 mg/kg/day, 3 days), which had been suggested to down-regulate 5-HT1B/1A receptors, was administered prior to self-administration testing. The effect of this manipulation on both the acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and the behavioural responses to 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation, was measured. A further study measured behavioural responses to 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor agonists prior to self-administration, to determine whether the variability in these responses would predict the variability in the latency to acquisition of MDMA self-administration. Lastly, the effect of substantial MDMA self-administration (350 mg/kg) on dose-response curves for the behavioural effects of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor activation was assessed.   Results: The hyperactive response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969, was blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, but not the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, GR127935. Similarly, the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, was dose-dependently blocked by WAY 100635. GR 127935, but not WAY 100635, blocked the adipsic response to RU 24969. Repeated administration of RU 24969 produced rightward shifts in the dose-response curves for 8-OH-DPAT-produced hyperactivity and RU 24969-produced adipsia, and also greatly facilitated the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. However, there was no correlation between latency to acquire MDMA self-administration and the hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT or the adipsic response to RU 24969, and MDMA self-administration failed to alter these behavioural response to activation of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors.   Conclusions: The hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT and the adipsic response to RU 24969 reflect activation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, respectively. The variability in acquisition of MDMA self-administration was reduced by a treatment that also down-regulated 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, however there was no further indication that these receptors play a critical role in the self-administration of MDMA. Instead, it seems likely that other 5-HT receptors have a greater impact on MDMA self-administration.</p>


1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (5) ◽  
pp. R1231-R1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bovetto ◽  
C. Rouillard ◽  
D. Richard

Two series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on energy intake and energy expenditure. The first set of experiments was carried out to confirm the influence of 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists on the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Plasma corticosterone levels were measured, and a double-immunolabeling procedure was used to determine whether the neuronal activity marker, c-Fos protein (Fos), could be found within brain neurons containing CRH after treatments with 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists. The second series of experiments was conducted to assess the involvement of CRH in the effects of 5-HT on food intake and metabolic rate (VO2). The effects of the 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists on food intake and VO2 were measured in rats treated with the CRH antagonist, alpha-helical CRH-(9-41). In both experiments rats were intraperitoneally injected with either a vehicle (NaCl 0.9%), the 5-HT1A-receptor agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), the 5-HT1B-receptor agonist 5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)-1H-indole succinate (RU-24969), or the 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonist (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl (DOI). Fos immunoreactivity was detectable within the CRH-containing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH) after injection of each of the 5-HT-receptor agonists used. The CRH antagonist alpha-helical CRH-(9-41) attenuated the increases in metabolic rate induced by DOI and 8-OH-DPAT. alpha-Helical CRH did not, however, prevent the effects of RU-24969 and DOI on either nocturnal metabolic rate or food intake. The present results provide further evidence for a role of CRH in 5-HT-mediated thermogenic effect, which likely involves the 5-HT2A/2C receptor during the day and the 5-HT1A receptor during the night. Moreover, these results do not support a role for CRH in 5-HT anorectic effects, which likely involves 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A/2C receptors. Finally, the results of this study indicate that the stimulation of CRH-containing neurons located in the PVH does not necessarily predict changes in food intake and energy expenditure.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document