A comparison between MBP- and NT* as N-terminal fusion partner for recombinant protein production in E. coli

2022 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 105991
Author(s):  
Sreejith Raran-Kurussi ◽  
Sarawata B. Sharwanlal ◽  
Deepa Balasubramanian ◽  
Kaustubh R. Mote
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Weber ◽  
Zhaopeng Li ◽  
Ursula Rinas

Abstract Background Recently it was shown that production of recombinant proteins in E. coli BL21(DE3) using pET based expression vectors leads to metabolic stress comparable to a carbon overfeeding response. Opposite to original expectations generation of energy as well as catabolic provision of precursor metabolites were excluded as limiting factors for growth and protein production. On the contrary, accumulation of ATP and precursor metabolites revealed their ample formation but insufficient withdrawal as a result of protein production mediated constraints in anabolic pathways. Thus, not limitation but excess of energy and precursor metabolites were identified as being connected to the protein production associated metabolic burden. Results Here we show that the protein production associated accumulation of energy and catabolic precursor metabolites is not unique to E. coli BL21(DE3) but also occurs in E. coli K12. Most notably, it was demonstrated that the IPTG-induced production of hFGF-2 using a tac-promoter based expression vector in the E. coli K12 strain TG1 was leading to persistent accumulation of key regulatory molecules such as ATP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and pyruvate. Conclusions Excessive energy generation, respectively, accumulation of ATP during recombinant protein production is not unique to the BL21(DE3)/T7 promoter based expression system but also observed in the E. coli K12 strain TG1 using another promoter/vector combination. These findings confirm that energy is not a limiting factor for recombinant protein production. Moreover, the data also show that an accelerated glycolytic pathway flux aggravates the protein production associated “metabolic burden”. Under conditions of compromised anabolic capacities cells are not able to reorganize their metabolic enzyme repertoire as required for reduced carbon processing.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1093-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Su Kim ◽  
Hyung-Moo Jung ◽  
Sang-Yong Kim ◽  
Liaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Jinglin Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Kastenhofer ◽  
Lukas Rettenbacher ◽  
Lukas Feuchtenhofer ◽  
Jürgen Mairhofer ◽  
Oliver Spadiut

Abstract BackgroundRecombinant proteins in Escherichia coli are expressed inside the cell. With the growing interest in continuous cultivation, secretion of product to the medium is not only a benefit, but a necessity in future bioprocessing. In this study, we present a novel E. coli production host for growth decoupled recombinant protein production that can leak up to 90% of recombinant protein to the extracellular space. We investigated the effects of the process parameters temperature and specific glucose uptake rate on physiology, productivity, lysis and leakiness. Two model proteins were used, Protein A and a VHH single-domain antibody, and performance was compared to the industrial standard strain BL21(DE3).ResultsWe show that inducible growth repression in the novel E. coli strain enGenes-X-press, the effect of the metabolic burden on host physiology can be greatly reduced compared to BL21(DE3). Furthermore, in both strains, increasing temperature and specific substrate enhanced productivity and leakiness. Using the enGenes-X-press strain, extracellular Protein A and VHH titer reached up to 349 mg/g and 19.6 mg/g, respectively, comprising between 80 and 90% of total soluble product, while keeping cell lysis to a minimum. BL21(DE3) leaked 198 mg/g and 3.9 mg/g of Protein A and VHH to the medium, accounting for only 56% and 34% of total soluble product, respectively.ConclusionsWe confined the parameter space in which outer membrane leakiness can be controlled, while maintaining cell viability. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that the enGenes-X-press strain constitutes a superior host for extracellular production of recombinant protein.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana C. Gomes ◽  
Gabriel A. Monteiro ◽  
Filipe J. Mergulhão

<p><em>Escherichia coli</em> biofilms have a great biotechnological potential since this organism has been one of the preferred hosts for recombinant protein production for the past decades and it has been successfully used in metabolic engineering for the production of high-value compounds.</p> <p>In a previous study, we have demonstrated that the non-induced enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) expression from <em>E. coli</em> biofilm cells was 30-fold higher than in the planktonic state without any optimization of cultivation parameters [1]. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of chemical induction with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) on the expression of eGFP by planktonic and biofilm cells of <em>E. coli</em> JM109(DE3) transformed with a plasmid containing a T7 promoter.</p> <p>It was shown that induction negatively affected the growth and viability of planktonic cultures, and eGFP production did not increase. Recombinant protein production was not limited by gene dosage or by transcriptional activity. Results suggest that plasmid maintenance at high copy number imposes a metabolic burden that precludes high level expression of the recombinant protein. In biofilm cells, the inducer avoided the overall decrease in the amount of expressed eGFP, although this was not correlated with the gene dosage. Higher specific production levels were always attained with biofilm cells and it seems that while induction of biofilm cells shifts their metabolism towards the maintenance of recombinant protein concentration, in planktonic cells the cellular resources are directed towards plasmid replication and growth [2].</p> <p>It is expected that this work will be of great value to elucidate the mechanisms of induction on recombinant protein production, especially in biofilm cells which have shown potential to be used as protein factories.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>References:</p> <p>[1] Gomes, L.C., & Mergulhão, F.J. (2017) Heterologous protein production in <em>Escherichia coli</em> biofilms: A non-conventional form of high cell density cultivation. <em>Process Biochemistry, 57, 1-8</em>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.03.018</p> <p>[2] Gomes, L., Monteiro, G., & Mergulhão, F. (2020). The Impact of IPTG Induction on Plasmid Stability and Heterologous Protein Expression by <em>Escherichia coli</em> Biofilms. <em>International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(2), 576</em>. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020576</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document