Eighty years of oral anticoagulation: Learning from history

2021 ◽  
pp. 106918
Author(s):  
Maria Rosa Montinari ◽  
Sergio Minelli ◽  
Raffaele De Caterina
1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 481-483
Author(s):  
Züger ◽  
Demarmels Biasiutti

Wir berichten über einen 76jährigen Patienten, welcher trotz gut eingestellter oraler Antikoagulation mit Phenprocoumon rezidivierende Thrombosen erlitt bei leichtgradiger chronischer disseminierter intravasaler Gerinnung. Die Abklärungen ergaben das Vorliegen eines Bronchus-Karzinoms (Non small cell cancer of the lung, NSCCL) mit hilären und mediastinalen Lymphknotenmetastasen. Aufgrund der Assoziation von rezidivierenden Thrombosen, aktivierter Gerinnung und Tumorleiden wurde die Diagnose eines Trousseau Syndroms gestellt. Basierend auf Fallberichten aus der Literatur wurde die Therapie auf intravenöses Heparin gewechselt, welches die thrombotische Koagulopathie stoppte. Aus praktischen Gründen erfolgte dann eine Umstellung der Therapie auf subcutanes niedermolekulares Heparin in therapeutischer Dosierung, welches während 6.5 Monaten ebenso effektiv war und eine Alternative zur etablierten Therapie mit unfraktioniertem Heparin bei Trousseau Syndrom darstellen dürfte.


1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (05) ◽  
pp. 676-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
J van der Meer ◽  
H L Hillege ◽  
P H J M Dunselman ◽  
B J M Mulder ◽  
H R Michels ◽  
...  

SummaryTo assess the optimal level of oral anticoagulation to prevent occlusion of vein coronary bypass grafts, 318 patients from a graft patency trial were analysed retrospectively. Oral anticoagulant therapy was started one day before surgery and continued for one year, after which graft occlusion was assessed by angiography. The aimed level of anticoagulation was 2.8-1.8 International Normalized Ratio (INR). Clinical outcome was assessed by the incidence of myocardial infarction, thrombosis and major bleeding.The observed anticoagulation level was 2.8-4.8 INR for 54%, and 1.8-3.8 INR for 75% of time per patient. Occlusion rates in patients who spent <35, 35-70, and ≥70% of time within INR range 2.8-1.8 were 10.5%, 10.8% and 11.8%, respectively (differences not statistically significant). Patients who spent ≥70% of time within INR range 1.8-3.8 versus 2.8-4.8 showed comparable occlusion rates. The risk of graft occlusion was not related to quality of anticoagulation early (0-3 months) or late (3-12 months) after surgery. Myocardial infarction, thrombosis and major bleeding occurred in 1.3%, 2.0% and 2.9% of patients.To maintain vein graft patency in the first postoperative year by oral anticoagulation, a level within INR range 1.8-3.8 for ≥70% of time seems to be sufficient.


1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1296-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Bertina ◽  
W van der Marel-van Nieuwkoop ◽  
E A Loeliger

SummaryTwo spectrophotometric assays for prothrombin have been developed and compared with a one stage coagulant and an immunological assay. One of these assays (called the XAPC assay) uses a combination of factor Xa, phospholipid, Ca2+ and factor V as activator of prothrombin, and measures only normal prothrombin. The second (the ECAR assay) uses Echis carinatus venom as activator. This assay measures both normal prothrombin and PIVKA II (protein induced by vitamin K antagonists/absence). Combination of the results obtained by the XAPC and ECAR assays provides rapid and reliable information on the degree of “subcarboxylation” of prothrombin (oral anticoagulation, vitamin K deficiency).For patients on long term anticoagulant treatment the prothrombin time (Thrombotest) shows better correlation with the ratio prothrombin/prothrombin plus PIVKA II (XAPC/ ECAR) than with the factor II concentration. For patients starting the anticoagulant treatment there is no correlation between the Thrombotest time and the XAPC/ECAR ratio.It seems doubtful that (a) spectrophotometric factor II assay(s) will be as useful as the prothrombin time in the control of oral anticoagulation.


1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Dieter Lockner ◽  
Kurt Bergström ◽  
Margareta Blombäck

SummaryIn order to investigate whether a more intensive initial oral anticoagulation still would be safe and effective, we performed a prospective randomized study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. They received either the conventional regimen of oral anticoagulation (“low-dose”) and heparin or a more intense oral anticoagulation (“high-dose”) with a shorter period of heparin treatment.In the first part of the study 129 patients were randomized. The “low-dose” group reached a stable therapeutic prothrombin complex (PT)-level after 4.3 and the “high-dose” group after 3.3 days. Heparin was discontinued after 6.0 and 5.0 days respectively. There was no difference in significant hemorrhage between the groups, and no clinical signs of progression of the thrombosis.In the second part of the study another 40 patients were randomized, followed with coagulation factor II, VII, IX and X and with repeated venograms. A stable therapeutic PT-level was achieved after 4.4 (“low-dose”) and 3.7 (“high-dose”) days, and heparin was discontinued after 5.4 and 4.4 days respectively. There were no clinical hemorrhages, the activity of the coagulation factors had dropped to the same level in both groups at the time when heparin was discontinued and no thromboembolic complications occurred.Our oral anticoagulation regimen with heparin treatment for an average of 4.4-5 days seems safe and reduces in-patient costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document