The association between psychological factors and the development of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) – A prospective multicenter study

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 399-400
Author(s):  
S.E. Abram
2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 971-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemerle Beerthuizenl ◽  
Dirk L. Stronksl ◽  
Frank J.P.M. Huygenl ◽  
Jan Passchierl ◽  
Jan Kleinl ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemerle Beerthuizen ◽  
Adriaan van ʼt Spijker ◽  
Frank J.P.M. Huygen ◽  
Jan Klein ◽  
Rianne de Wit

Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (11) ◽  
pp. 2310-2318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie J. Bean ◽  
Malcolm H. Johnson ◽  
Wolfgang Heiss-Dunlop ◽  
Arier C. Lee ◽  
Robert R. Kydd

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3, 9-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth ◽  
Tom W. Bohr

Abstract From the previous issue, this article continues a discussion of the potentially confusing aspects of the diagnostic formulation for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), the relevance of these issues for a proposed future protocol, and recommendations for clinical practice. IASP is working to resolve the contradictions in its approach to CRPS-1 diagnosis, but it continues to include the following criterion: “[c]ontinuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event.” This language only perpetuates existing issues with current definitions, specifically the overlap between the IASP criteria for CRPS-1 and somatoform disorders, overlap with the guidelines for malingering, and self-contradiction with respect to the suggestion of injury-relatedness. The authors propose to overcome the last of these by revising the criterion: “[c]omplaints of pain in the absence of any identifiable injury that could credibly account for the complaints.” Similarly, the overlap with somatoform disorders could be reworded: “The possibility of a somatoform disorder has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a somatoform scenario.” The overlap with malingering could be addressed in this manner: “The possibility of malingering has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a malingering scenario.” The article concludes with six recommendations, and a sidebar discusses rating impairment for CRPS-1 (with explicit instructions not to use the pain chapter for this purpose).


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Tae Kyu Park ◽  
Kyung Ream Han ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Young Joo Lee ◽  
Chan Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Yasin Demir ◽  
Ümüt Güzelküçük ◽  
Serdar Kesikburun ◽  
Berke Aras ◽  
Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Davide Gatti ◽  
Angelo Fassio ◽  
Francesco Bertoldo

Pain Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1388-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid G. L. Fischer ◽  
Susan Collins ◽  
Sabine Boogaard ◽  
Stephan A. Loer ◽  
Wouter W. A. Zuurmond ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document