Sex differences in the impact of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on colorectal cancer screening

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 106171
Author(s):  
Kirsten Y. Eom ◽  
Marian Jarlenski ◽  
Robert E. Schoen ◽  
Linda Robertson ◽  
Lindsay M. Sabik
2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Huguet ◽  
Heather Angier ◽  
Rebecca Rdesinski ◽  
Megan Hoopes ◽  
Miguel Marino ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey A. Fedewa ◽  
K. Robin Yabroff ◽  
Robert A. Smith ◽  
Ann Goding Sauer ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
Tomas Poskus ◽  
Inga Kildusiene ◽  
Ausvydas Patasius ◽  
Rokas Stulpinas ◽  
...  

We aimed to report the results of the implementation of the National Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program covering all the country. The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) reimburses the institutions for performing each service; each procedure within the program has its own administrative code. Information about services provided within the program was retrieved from the database of NHIF starting from the 1 January 2014 to the 31 December 2018. Exact date and type of all provided services, test results, date and results of biopsy and histopathological examination were extracted together with the vital status at the end of follow-up, date of death and date of emigration when applicable for all men and women born between 1935 and 1968. Results were compared with the guidelines of the European Union for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis. The screening uptake was 49.5% (754,061 patients) during study period. Participation rate varied from 16% to 18.1% per year and was higher among women than among men. Proportion of test-positive and test-negative results was similar during all the study period—8.7% and 91.3% annually. Between 9.2% and 13.5% of test-positive patients received a biopsy of which 52.3–61.8% were positive for colorectal adenoma and 4.6–7.3% for colorectal carcinoma. CRC detection rate among test-positive individuals varied between 0.93% and 1.28%. The colorectal cancer screening program in Lithuania coverage must be improved. A screening database is needed to systematically evaluate the impact and performance of the national CRC screening program and quality assurance within the program.


2021 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523
Author(s):  
Lindy M. Kregting ◽  
Sylvia Kaljouw ◽  
Lucie de Jonge ◽  
Erik E. L. Jansen ◽  
Elleke F. P. Peterse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the effects of five restart strategies after the disruption on required screening capacity and cancer burden. Methods Microsimulation models simulated five restart strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The models estimated required screening capacity, cancer incidence, and cancer-specific mortality after a disruption of 6 months. The restart strategies varied in whether screens were caught up or not and, if so, immediately or delayed, and whether the upper age limit was increased. Results The disruption in screening programmes without catch-up of missed screens led to an increase of 2.0, 0.3, and 2.5 cancer deaths per 100 000 individuals in 10 years in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Immediately catching-up missed screens minimised the impact of the disruption but required a surge in screening capacity. Delaying screening, but still offering all screening rounds gave the best balance between required capacity, incidence, and mortality. Conclusions Strategies with the smallest loss in health effects were also the most burdensome for the screening organisations. Which strategy is preferred depends on the organisation and available capacity in a country.


Medical Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frank Wharam ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Bruce E. Landon ◽  
Robert LeCates ◽  
Stephen Soumerai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document