HTLV ANTIBODY POSITIVITY AND INCIDENCE OF ADULT T-CELL LEUKAEMIA IN KOCHI PREFECTURE, JAPAN

The Lancet ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 322 (8357) ◽  
pp. 1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokuni Taguchi ◽  
Masatoshi Fujishita ◽  
Isao Miyoshi ◽  
Isao Mizobuchi ◽  
Akira Nagasaki
1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1207-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan-Shun Luo ◽  
Hideto Tamura ◽  
Norio Yokose ◽  
Kiyoyuki Ogata ◽  
Kazuo Dan
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
Atsuko Nasu ◽  
Yuka Gion ◽  
Yoshito Nishimura ◽  
Asami Nishikori ◽  
Misa Sakamoto ◽  
...  

Differentiation between adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), is often challenging based on pathological findings alone. Although serum anti-HTLV-1 antibody positivity is required for ATLL diagnosis, this information is often not available at the time of pathological diagnosis. Therefore, we examined whether the expression of SOX4 and p16 would be helpful for differentiating the two disease entities. We immunohistochemically examined SOX4 and p16 expression (which have been implicated in ATLL carcinogenesis) in 11 ATLL patients and 20 PTCL-NOS patients and classified them into four stages according to the percentage of positive cells. Among the ATLL cases, 8/11 (73%) were SOX4-positive, while only 2/20 (10%) PTCL-NOS cases expressed SOX4. The mean total score was 4.2 (standard deviation (SD): 0.61) in the ATLL group and 0.50 (SD: 0.46) in the PTCL-NOS group (p < 0.001). Positive expression of p16 was noted in 4/11 (36%) patients with ATLL and 3/20 (15%) patients with PTCL-NOS, with mean total scores of 1.9 (SD: 0.64) and 0.70 (SD: 0.48) in the ATLL and PTCL-NOS groups, respectively (p = 0.141). These results suggest that SOX4 may be strongly expressed in ATLL compared to PTCL-NOS cases. Therefore, it may be helpful to perform immunohistochemical staining of SOX4 when pathologists face challenges discriminating between ATLL and PTCL-NOS.


1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1623-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. F. T. Copeland ◽  
A. G. M. Haaksma ◽  
J. Goudsmit ◽  
J. L. Heeney

2003 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kami ◽  
Tamae Hamaki ◽  
Shigesaburo Miyakoshi ◽  
Naoko Murashige ◽  
Yoshinobu Kanda ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John C. Morris ◽  
Thomas A. Waldmann

Over the past decade, monoclonal antibodies have dramatically impacted the treatment of haematological malignancies, as evidenced by the effect of rituximab on the response rate and survival of patients with follicular and diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Currently, only two monoclonal antibodies – the anti-CD33 immunotoxin gemtuzumab ozogamicin and the CD52-directed antibody alemtuzumab – are approved for treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients and B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, respectively. Although not approved for such treatment, alemtuzumab is also active against T cell prolymphocytic leukaemia, cutaneous T cell lymphoma and Sézary syndrome, and adult T cell leukaemia and lymphoma. In addition, rituximab has demonstrated activity against B cell chronic lymphocytic and hairy cell leukaemia. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD4, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD25, CD45, CD66 and CD122 are now being studied in the clinic for the treatment of leukaemia. Here, we discuss how these new antibodies have been engineered to reduce immunogenicity and improve antibody targeting and binding. Improved interactions with Fc receptors on immune effector cells can enhance destruction of target cells through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-mediated cell lysis. The antibodies can also be armed with cellular toxins or radionuclides to enhance the destruction of leukaemia cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document