Corneal wedge resection to treat progressive keratoconus in the host cornea after penetrating keratoplasty

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Ilari ◽  
Sheraz M. Daya
1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-516
Author(s):  
Sandra C Belmont ◽  
Douglas R Lazzaro ◽  
Jacqueline W Muller ◽  
Richard C Troutman

Cornea ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Fideliz de la Paz ◽  
Gimena Rojas Sibila ◽  
Gustavo Montenegro ◽  
Juan Alvarez de Toledo ◽  
Ralph Michael ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepehr Feizi ◽  
Mohammad Zare

A successful corneal graft requires both clarity and an acceptable refraction. A clear corneal graft may be an optical failure if high astigmatism limits visual acuity. Intraoperative measures to reduce postkeratoplasty astigmatism include round and central trephination of cornea with an adequate size, appropriate sutures with evenly distributed tension, and perfect graft-host apposition. Suture manipulation has been described for minimising early postoperative astigmatism. If significant astigmatism remains after suture removal, which cannot be corrected by optical means, then further surgical procedures containing relaxing incisions, compression sutures, laser refractive surgery, insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments, wedge resection, and toric intraocular lens implantation can be performed. When astigmatism cannot be reduced using one or more abovementioned approaches, repeat penetrating keratoplasty should inevitably be considered. However, none of these techniques has emerged as an ideal one, and corneal surgeons may require combining two or more approaches to exploit the maximum advantages.


1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 650-653
Author(s):  
Miguel Lugo ◽  
Eric D Donnenfeld ◽  
Juan J Arentsen

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiki Oshida ◽  
Noriko Fushimi ◽  
Takashi Sakimoto ◽  
Mitsuru Sawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document