The treatment of deep shoulder infection and glenohumeral instability with debridement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and post-operative antibiotics

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
G.S. Athwal
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tyler Smith ◽  
Joseph D’Alonzo ◽  
Alfonso Arevalo ◽  
Jack Kazanjian

Case. Two elderly males presented with traumatic shoulder dislocation and bony Bankart fracture consisting of greater than 25% of the glenoid width. Due to several concomitant factors such as polytrauma, activity level, rotator cuff pathology, optimization of comorbidities, risk of complications, and potential for revision surgery, the patients were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Conclusion. RSA may be a satisfactory treatment option for isolated, large glenoid fractures associated with anterior glenohumeral instability in the elderly. These patients are susceptible to rapid deconditioning with prolonged immobilization and may not be medically suited to undergo the prolonged recovery period associated with open reduction internal fixation or potentially undergo revision operations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1587-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Hasler ◽  
Paolo Fornaciari ◽  
Anna Jungwirth-Weinberger ◽  
Thorsten Jentzsch ◽  
Karl Wieser ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Sebastian Klingebiel ◽  
Christoph Theil ◽  
Georg Gosheger ◽  
Kristian Nikolaus Schneider ◽  
Thomas Ackmann ◽  
...  

Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infections are devastating complications after shoulder arthroplasty. A potential treatment concept is a two-stage prosthesis exchange. Data are sparse in terms of clinical outcome, including infection-free survival and patient satisfaction after this procedure. In the present study, we investigated recurrence of infection, revision-free survivorship and clinical outcome following two-stage revision due to periprosthetic shoulder infection. Furthermore, reasons for poor outcome were analyzed. Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing two-stage revision after shoulder joint infection were retrospectively identified. Recurrence of infection was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Clinical outcome was quantified with subjective shoulder value (SSV), “quick” Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) and Rowe score. Range of motion (ROM) was measured pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative scores and ROM were compared in a subgroup analysis according to different reimplanted prosthesis types. Results: The reinfection-free implant survival was 81% after one year and at final follow-up (FU; mean of 33.2 months). The overall revision-free survival amounted to 56% after one year and at final FU. Patients who received reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as part of reimplantation had less disability and long-term complications. This group demonstrated better subjective stability and function compared to patients revised to megaprostheses or large-head hemiarthroplasties. Conclusions: Two-stage revision following periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder allows appropriate infection control in the majority of patients. However, the overall complications and revision rates due to mechanical failure or reinfection are high. Reimplantation of RSA seem superior to alternative prosthesis models in terms of function and patient satisfaction. Therefore, bone-saving surgery and reconstruction of the glenoid may increase the likelihood of reimplantation of RSA and potentially improve outcome in the case of infection-related two-stage revision of the shoulder.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. e333
Author(s):  
Bradley S. Schoch ◽  
William R. Aibinder ◽  
Jordan D. Walters ◽  
John W. Sperling ◽  
Thomas (Quin) Throckmorton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document