scholarly journals Changes in paddy cropping system enhanced economic profit and ecological sustainability in central China

2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-577
Author(s):  
Yong ZHOU ◽  
Xiao-yuan YAN ◽  
Song-ling GONG ◽  
Cheng-wei LI ◽  
Rong ZHU ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wu ◽  
Lixiao Nie ◽  
Yuncheng Liao ◽  
Farooq Shah ◽  
Kehui Cui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 106431 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Lal ◽  
Priyanka Gautam ◽  
B.B. Panda ◽  
R. Tripathi ◽  
M. Shahid ◽  
...  

Agriculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz von Cossel ◽  
Andrea Bauerle ◽  
Meike Boob ◽  
Ulrich Thumm ◽  
Martin Elsaesser ◽  
...  

Biogas production is a key renewable energy pathway for a more sustainable future bioeconomy. However, there is a crucial trade-off between biomass productivity and social-ecological sustainability of available biogas cropping systems. Permanent grassland has been frequently promoted as a promising perennial cropping system for biomass production. Three- and four-cut regimes are usually the highest-yielding and thus preferable for biogas production. A three-year field trial in southwest Germany investigated biomass yield and biochemical composition of mesotrophic Arrhenatheretum grassland under three cutting regimes (two-, three- and four-cut). For the three-cut regime, a preliminary biogas batch test was conducted. The three-cut regime had the highest annual accumulated dry matter yield (11.8–14.8 Mg ha−1), an average specific methane yield of 0.289 m3N kg−1 volatile solids−1 and an accumulated annual methane yield of 3167–3893 m³N ha−1. The four-cut regime performed least favorably due to a lower dry matter yield than the three-cut regime, the highest ash content and the highest nitrogen content. Thus, the three-cut regime promises the best yield performance, whereas the two-cut regime can potentially provide more ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation and wild-game protection. Consequently, the two-cut regime could help improve the social-ecological sustainability of biogas crop cultivation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document