MPN-332: Clinical Benefit of Pelabresib (Cpi-0610) in Combination with Ruxolitinib in JAK Inhibitor Treatment-Naïve Myelofibrosis Patients: Interim Efficacy Subgroup Analysis from Arm 3 of the MANIFEST Phase 2 Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S362
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Marina Kremyanskaya ◽  
John Mascarenhas ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Andrea Patriarca ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Garrido-Castro ◽  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Romualdo Barroso-Sousa ◽  
Hao Guo ◽  
Eva Ciruelos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss of PTEN and/or INPP4B is common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Methods This was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies. Results Fifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2–25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN were present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease. Conclusions Buparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. Trial registration NCT01790932. Registered on 13 February 2013; NCT01629615. Registered on 27 June 2012.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7576-TPS7576
Author(s):  
Nathan Hale Fowler ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Simon Rule ◽  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
Long Kwei ◽  
...  

TPS7576 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A limited number of chemotherapy-free options exist for patients with treatment-naïve (TN) FL who are older or who have comorbidities. Single-agent rituximab is considered a treatment option for elderly or infirm patients. In a phase 2 study, frontline treatment with ibrutinib in combination with rituximab for 4 weekly doses without maintenance resulted in an ORR of 85% (CR, 35%) with a median follow-up of 22 months and an 18-month PFS rate of 87% (Fowler Blood 2016). The phase 2 study serves as the basis for the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 PERSPECTIVE (PCYC-1141-CA) trial. PERSPECTIVE will be conducted in two parts and will uniquely test (1) whether frontline treatment with ibrutinib in combination with rituximab results in prolongation of PFS compared to rituximab alone, and (2) whether continuous versus finite treatment with ibrutinib affects PFS outcomes. Methods: In the ongoing PERSPECTIVE trial, approximately 440 patients with TN FL meeting at least one Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criterion will be randomized if they also meet one of the following criteria: age ≥70 years or age 60 to 69 with one or more comorbidities (creatinine clearance 30-59 mL/min or ECOG performance status of 2). Patients will be randomized to receive either ibrutinib or oral placebo once daily. All patients will be given rituximab for 4 weekly doses followed by maintenance. After at least 2 years of treatment in Part 1, patients randomized to ibrutinib who still remain on ibrutinib will be re-randomized in Part 2 to continue ibrutinib or switch to placebo. Key exclusion criteria include any prior treatment for FL, evidence of CNS involvement, or transformation. Analyses will be conducted in two distinct parts, both with a primary endpoint of PFS. The study is open for enrollment with sites planned in the US, EU, and Asia Pacific. Clinical trial information: NCT02947347.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7511-7511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Hamlin ◽  
Bruce D. Cheson ◽  
Charles Michael Farber ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Timothy S Fenske ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 345-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Munakata ◽  
Naohiro Sekiguchi ◽  
Rai Shinya ◽  
Kenshi Suzuki ◽  
Hiroshi Handa ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in which bone marrow is infiltrated by immunoglobulin M (IgM)-producing clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells. Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059) is a second-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor with greater selectivity than ibrutinib. We performed a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study of tirabrutinib in patients with treatment-naïve (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) WM. METHODS Patients with TN or R/R WM, serum IgM ≥500 mg/dL, ECOG performance status ≥1, and normal end-organ function were treated with tirabrutinib 480 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was major response rate (MRR, ≥ partial response [PR]) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the criteria of the VIth International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (IWWM) (Owen RG et al. Br J Haematol. 2013). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR, ≥ minor response [MR]), time to major response (TTMR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Twenty seven patients (18 TN and 9 R/R) were treated as of July 3, 2019, and the median follow-up duration was 6 months. The median age of patients was 71 years (range 50-83), and 20 patients (74.1%) had ECOG performance status 0. Median serum IgM was 3600 mg/dL (range 730-6930). Median number of prior therapies among R/R patients was 2 (range 1-7), and 8 patients had received prior rituximab monotherapy or rituximab-containing chemotherapy. IRC-assessed MRR was 77.8% (95%CI: 52.4-93.6) in TN and 88.9% (95%CI: 51.8-99.7) in R/R. IRC-assessed ORR was 94.4% (95%CI: 72.7-99.9) in TN and 100% (95%CI: 66.4-100.0) in R/R. Median TTMR was 1.9 months (range 1.0-5.7) in TN and 2.1 months (range 1.0-3.7) in R/R. Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) at any grade were rash (41%), neutropenia (22%), and leukopenia (15%), of which most were grade 1 or 2. Grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (7.4%), leukopenia, lymphopenia, atypical mycobacterial infection, rash erythematous, and erythema multiforme (3.7% each); there was no grade 4 or 5 AE. There were 4 bleeding events and all events were grade 1: mouth hemorrhage, petechiae, anal hemorrhage, and hematoma (3.7% each). Rash-related events occurred in 56% of patients and 2 events were grade 3: erythema multiforme and rash erythematous (3.7% each) which were manageable. CONCLUSION Although the follow-up time was relatively short, the results of this phase 2 study showed that tirabrutinib monotherapy is a highly effective treatment option for patients with TN and R/R WM, with a manageable safety profile. Disclosures Munakata: Ono: Research Funding. Sekiguchi:Ono, A2 Healthcare, Astellas, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme. Otsuka, Pfizer, PPD SNBL, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Shinya:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Suzuki:Ono: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Handa:Ono: Research Funding. Shibayama:Astellas, Teijin, MSD, Shionogi, Eisai, Sumitomo Dainippon, Taiho, Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Chugai, Eisai, Mundi Pharma, Ono, Otsuka, Kyowa Kirin, Sumitomo Dainippon, AstraZeneca, Avvie, DaiichiSankyo, Fujimoto, Nippon Shinyaku, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Endo:Ono: Research Funding. Terui:Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, MSD, Eisai, Ono, and Chugai-Roche Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria. Iwaki:Ono: Research Funding. Fukuhara:AbbVie: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Nippon Shinkyaku: Honoraria; Mundi: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Mochida: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding. Tatetsu:Ono: Research Funding. Iida:Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shiibashi:Ono: Employment. Izutsu:Chugai, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Eisai, Symbio, Ono, Bayer, Solasia, Zenyaku, Incyte, Novartis, Sanofi, HUYA Bioscience, MSD, Astellas Amgen, Abbvie, ARIAD, Takeda, Pfizer: Research Funding; Eisai, Symbio, Chugai, Zenyaku: Research Funding; Eisai, Chugai, Zenyaku: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, Takeda, MSD, Chugai, Nihon Medi-physics, Janssen, Ono, Abbvie, Dainihon Sumitomo, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, HUYA Japan, Novartis, Bristol-Byers Squibb, Mundi, Otsuka, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Asahi Kasei: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Tirabrutinib. Clinical trial for WM/LPL.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 497-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Patricia Kropf ◽  
Casey O'Connell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background SGI-110 is second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing longer half-life and more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. SGI-110 differentiated pharmacokinetic profile resulted in potent hypomethylation and clinical responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients in the phase 1 trial (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Methods In a randomized Phase 2 study, relapsed/refractory AML, or elderly treatment naïve AML patients who were not suitable for induction chemotherapy (poor major organ function; poor cytogenetics; or secondary AML) were randomized to one of two SQ doses – the biologically effective dose (BED) of 60 mg/m2 QDx5 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is the overall remission rate (CR, CRi, and CRp) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2003. Safety findings based on adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic data on Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element (LINE-1) DNA methylation (an index of global DNA methylation) activity were also assessed and reported. Results As of June 30, 2013, sixty-seven patients (50 relapsed/refractory AML, 17 treatment naïve elderly AML) were treated and had a minimum follow up of 3 months. Patients were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 dose (32 patients) or 90 mg/m2 dose (35 patients). The median age was 66 years (range, 22–84), 69% were male, and ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was reported in 11/47/9 patients respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 0–10). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 dose groups. The primary endpoint of overall remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed in 17/67 patients (25% with 95% CI, 16–37%). There were 8 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (16% with 95% CI, 7-29%); and 9 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 17 treatment-naïve elderly AML patients (53% with 95% CI, 28-77%). Five patients (4 relapsed/refractory, and one treatment-naïve elderly AML) subsequently received a stem cell transplant. There was no difference in the complete remission rate between 60 and 90 mg/m2 doses (8 remissions in 32 patients at 60 mg/m2, and 9 remissions in 35 patients at 90 mg/m2). LINE-1 DNA methylation data before and after treatment was available in 50 (75%) patients enrolled. LINE-1 demethylation ≥ 10% post treatment was observed in 83% and 78% in the 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The median maximum LINE-1 demethylation for responders is 25% as compared to 19% for non-responders. The most common adverse events (AEs) regardless of relationship to SGI-110 ≥ Grade 3 include febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia. The 90 mg/m2 dose showed a greater frequency of Grade 3/4 related AEs ≥ 10% (anemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) compared to the 60 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a new HMA which is well tolerated and clinically active in the treatment of AML. Complete remissions and potent demethylation of ≥10% were equally observed at the 2 dose groups of 60 and 90 mg/m2. These data support further phase 3 investigation of this agent in the treatment of AML. Preliminary overall remission rate of 53% in treatment-naïve elderly AML seems to compare favorably with previous results reported for HMA treatment but this needs to be confirmed in a larger number of patients and randomized studies. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kropf:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Savona:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ervin:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Daver:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Borthakur:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wierda:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Brandwein:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Odenike:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Dimitrov:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document