The growth of faecal microbiota transplantation in the UK: time for a registry?

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
David Inglis ◽  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Christopher Green ◽  
Tariq Iqbal
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e133-e134
Author(s):  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Sahida Shabir ◽  
Susan E Manzoor ◽  
Christopher A Green ◽  
Naveen Sharma ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Roger Mcilroy ◽  
Niharika Nalagatla ◽  
Richard Hansen ◽  
Ailsa Hart ◽  
Georgina Louise Hold

BackgroundInterest in the use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased following outcomes in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). While research exploring clinician awareness and attitude towards the use of FMT in CDI has been carried out, data for IBD are currently lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the perceptions of gastroenterologists and current practice relating to FMT as a treatment for IBD in the UK.DesignA web-based survey (Snap Survey software) was distributed through the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition e-newsletters, and at the BSG Conference in June 2017.Results61 respondents completed the survey including presubspecialty trainees, gastroenterology specialists, associate specialists and consultants. Most (95%; n=58) respondents stated that they had heard of FMT being used as a treatment for IBD prior to participating in the survey. Based on current evidence, 34% (n=21) of respondents would consider using FMT in patients with IBD, 26% (n=16) would not and 39% (n=24) were undecided. When asked to rank routes of delivery in terms of preference, nasogastric tube was the least preferred route (39%; n=24) and oral capsule was the most preferred route (34%; n=21).ConclusionsA clear majority of UK gastroenterologists recognise FMT as a potential treatment for IBD; however, uptake is limited. A proportion of clinicians would consider FMT in IBD and the majority would consider entering patients into clinical trials. Future work should explore the utility and efficacy of oral FMT capsules in IBD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-641-S-642
Author(s):  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Victoria L. McCune ◽  
Tariq Iqbal ◽  
Shri Pathmakanthan ◽  
J. Keith Struthers ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e048541
Author(s):  
Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold ◽  
Håvard H Fretheim ◽  
Vikas K Sarna ◽  
Imon Barua ◽  
Maylen N Carstens ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn the multisystem inflammatory disorder systemic sclerosis (SSc), gastrointestinal tract (GIT) affliction is highly prevalent. There are no known disease modifying therapies and the negative impact is substantial. Aiming for a new therapeutic principle, and inspired by recent work showing associations between gut microbiota changes and GIT symptoms in SSc, we performed a pilot study on faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with the single-donor bacterial culture ‘Anaerobic Cultivated Human Intestinal Microbiome (ACHIM)’. Motivated by positive pilot study signals, we designed the ReSScue trial as a phase II multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised 20-week trial to evaluate safety and efficacy on lower GIT symptoms of FMT by ACHIM in SSc.Methods and analysesWe aim to include 70 SSc participants with moderate to severe lower GIT symptoms, defined by the validated patient-reported University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 2.0 questionnaire. The trial includes three parts. In part A1 (induction phase) lasting from week 0 to week 12, participants will be randomised 1:1 to repeat infusions of 30 mL ACHIM or placebo at week 0 and 2 by gastroduodenoscopy. In part A2, which is an 8-week subsequent maintenance phase, all study participants will receive 30 mL ACHIM at week 12 and followed until week 20 on continued blind. In part B, which will last until the last participant completes part A2, the participants will be followed through a maximum 16-week extended monitoring period, for longer-term data on safety and intervention effects. Primary endpoint is change from baseline to week 12 in UCLA GIT subscale scores of diarrhoea or bloating, depending on the worst symptom at baseline evaluated separately for each patient. Secondary endpoints are safety measures and changes in UCLA GIT scores (total, diarrhoea and bloating).Ethics and disseminationThis protocol was approved by the Northern Norwegian Committee for Medical Ethics. Study findings will be published.Trial registration numberNCT04300426; Pre-results.Protocol versionV.3.1.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Cui ◽  
Huiwen Xiao ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Lixin Zhou ◽  
Shuyi Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document