The Role of the Public Bureaucracy in Policy Implementation in Five ASEAN Countries

2016 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Syefiq Marliaz ◽  
Shahril Azih

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of government mass communication in ASEAN countries in health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to increase awareness of COVID-19, the development of digital-based information is increasingly needed. The public needs credible and reliable information to find out the Covid-19 phenomenon and its various impacts. people are increasingly understanding ways to protect themselves, their families, and the environment appropriately. This will also affect the improvement of public health services by providing good education and guidelines in mass media communication in ASEAN countries, especially in improving health services to the community


PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25
Author(s):  
Panji Gedhe Prabawa ◽  
Hardi Warsono ◽  
Ida Hayu Dwimawanti

This research explains the driving and inhibiting factors and has the aim to describe and analyze the driving and inhibiting factors in implementing E-ticketing policy in Semarang City. This research was prepared using qualitative methods that describe the phenomenon of policy implementation such as: communication, resources, disposition and bureaucratic structure. The results showed the implementation of the E-Traffic Policy in Semarang City in 2019 had not been going well and was fast overall. This aspect can be seen from: policy communication is not going well, the implementer does not need approval and the community lacks information on how E-Tilang is implemented. Public policy resources that have been published, human resources, authority, infrastructure, information resources and authority, but still not optimal. Aspects related to good employee relations, do not yet exist in the public bureaucracy do not yet support. The driving factors are leadership support, adequate resources, staff readiness, and community support. The inhibiting factor is the need for time to determine policy, fragmentation, community misunderstanding and wrong perception.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1210
Author(s):  
Tri YUNININGSIH ◽  
Sri SUWITRI ◽  
KISMARTINI KISMARTINI ◽  
Etty SOESILOWATI

There aren’t optimal development and management efforts the object and tourist attraction. Yet its optimal development of tourist destinations. Yet it’s optimal participation of the private and the public in the development of tourism. It is becoming an indication of the importance of the network actors study in the policy implementation of tourism development in Semarang City. This research applies qualitative descriptive analysis. The technique uses key informant selection of informants, namely the Department of culture and tourism in Semarang City. The results showed that the policy implementation of tourism development in Semarang city hasn’t run with optimal. It is characterized by the role of the actors involved have not been able to work together. As it doesn’t yet optimal role of Semarang Tourism Promotion Agency is known as BP2KS. In addition, the presence of distrust among the actors involved. In the findings of the field, the concept of development of tourism in Semarang City is using model Pentahelix, including academia, business, Government, community and the Mass Media. Fore the need to immediately increase communication and coordination and transparency among the actors, among others through the forum gatherings and public hearing. Further strengthen the institutional function BP2KS. Need to be calculated as a sense of belonging “the soul of the region’s wisdom".


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 493-506
Author(s):  
Sirvan Karimi

The expansion of public bureaucracy has been one of the most significant developments that has marked societies, particularly Western liberal democratic societies. Growing political apathy, citizen disgruntlement and the ensuing decline in electoral participation reflects the political nature of governance failures. Public bureaucracy, which has historically been saddled with derogatory and pejorative connotations, has encountered fierce assaults from multiple fronts. Out of these sharp criticisms of public bureaucracy that have emanated from both sides of the ideological spectrum, attempts have been made to popularize and advance citizen participation in both policy formulation and policy implementation processes as innovations to democratize public administration. Despite their virtue, empowering connotations and spirit-uplifting messages to the public, these proposed practices of democratic innovations not only have their own shortcomings and are conducive to exacerbating the conditions that they are directed to ameliorate but they also  have the potential  to undermine the traditional administrative and political accountability mechanisms.


1983 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Hunter

This article explores some limitations on the power of the public bureaucracies to control public sector budgets. Two conditions are considered within a majority rule election framework. First, individuals may react to the potential loss of income resulting from a bureaucratically chosen output of public goods. Second, bureaucratic control of the public budget is constrained by the existing tax structure. The model demonstrates that the bureaucratic ability to set public expenditure levels has been seriously overestimated. Further, the model raises questions as to the role of the median voter in elections when the agenda is controlled by a public bureaucracy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Firdaus Firdaus ◽  
Susi Lawati

The position and role of the state apparatus which is often referred to as the government bureaucracy is of concern, because most of the life of the state is regulated and determined by the government through the government bureaucracy. The position and role of the bureaucracy is interesting to discuss because the position and role have not been as expected. In general, the position of the government bureaucracy is always opposite between the rulers of the government / state and the people or the people they control. Where should the position of the bureaucracy be and what role should it play as long as the bureaucracy emphasizes the position of political power rather than socio-culture, the bureaucracy becomes a servant to certain political interests so that services to the public are replaced by services to political power, so that every service is rooted in public service. always has the color of power and prioritizes the political interests served instead of the public interest as a whole. In line with the changes that have occurred in the order of government implementation and the development of community life in various aspects of life, the role of society in the life of the state has begun to be felt. Public demands began to affect the government work bureaucracy system. This situation in turn makes it increasingly possible to change the position and role of the public bureaucracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document