Parent–child relationships among older Chinese immigrants: the influence of co-residence, frequent contact, intergenerational support and sense of children's deference

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1459-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAN GUO ◽  
LING XU ◽  
JINYU LIU ◽  
WEIYU MAO ◽  
IRIS CHI

ABSTRACTImmigration disrupts the bonding process in families. Maintaining close relationships with adult children can be an important protective factor for older immigrants' health and wellbeing. Quantitative research explaining such close relationships is rare. This study examined factors associated with close parent–child relationships in a purposive sample of 236 older Chinese immigrants in Los Angeles who provided information regarding 365 children. Two-level regression models were estimated to investigate factors contributing to cohesive parent–child relationships among these older adults. The findings showed that co-residence, a characteristic that distinguishes immigrant families from most non-immigrant families, was associated with lower parent–child relationship quality. Frequent contact was associated with closer relationships. While receiving instrumental and monetary support from children was associated with favourable ratings of relationships with children, providing such support to children was not related to parents' assessment of relationship quality. Parental perceptions of children being respectful was also associated with better relationship quality ratings. Overall, the findings demonstrate how family-related changes in the immigration context shape parent–child relationships in later life. Implications for future research and practice are provided.

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 2103-2127 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIAOPING LIN ◽  
CHRISTINA BRYANT ◽  
JENNIFER BOLDERO ◽  
BRIONY DOW

ABSTRACTAgainst the background of population ageing and increasing cultural diversity in many Western countries, the study examined differences and similarities between Australian-born people and Chinese immigrants in their relationships with adult children. The specific research questions were: (a) are there differences between these groups in the nature of parent–child relationships; and (b) if there were differences, did these differences reflect the Confucian concept of filial piety among older Chinese immigrants. The solidarity–conflict model and the concept of ambivalence were used to quantify parent–child relationships. Data from 122 community-dwelling people aged 65 and over (60 Australian-born and 62 Chinese-born people) were collected using standardised interviews. There were significant differences between the two groups for all relationship dimensions except associative solidarity. Compared to Australian participants, Chinese participants were more likely to live with their children. However, when they did not live with their children, they lived further away. They were also more likely to receive, but less likely to provide, instrumental help. Finally, they reported higher levels of normative solidarity, conflict and ambivalence, and lower levels of affectual and consensual solidarity. The differences in solidarity dimensions persisted when socio-demographic variables were controlled for. The study revealed complex differences in the nature of older parent–child relationships between Australian-born people and Chinese immigrants. Some of these differences, such as more prevalent multigenerational living among older Chinese immigrants, likely reflect the strong influence of filial piety among this group. However, differences in other dimensions, such as lower levels of consensual solidarity, might be associated with the Chinese participants’ experience as immigrants. This study also highlights the usefulness of the solidarity–conflict model as a theoretical framework to understand the nature of parent–child relationships among older Chinese immigrants.


2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Schwarz ◽  
Gisela Trommsdorff ◽  
Isabelle Albert ◽  
Boris Mayer

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khanh T. Dinh ◽  
Barbara R. Sarason ◽  
Irwin G. Sarason

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-755
Author(s):  
Bukola Salami ◽  
Dominic A. Alaazi ◽  
Sophie Yohani ◽  
Helen Vallianatos ◽  
Philomina Okeke‐Ihejirika ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document