scholarly journals Norwegian Open Fracture Management System: Outcomes After 10 Years Working in Low-Resource Settings in Cambodian Hospitals

Author(s):  
Nenad B. Tajsic ◽  
Sigrunn H. Sørbye ◽  
Sophy Nguon ◽  
Vannara Sokh ◽  
Aymeric Lim

Abstract Introduction: The treatment of open lower limb fractures represents a major challenge for any trauma surgeon, and this even more so in resource-limited areas. The aim of the study is to describe the intervention, report the treatment plan, and observe the effectiveness of the Norwegian Open Fracture Management System in saving lower limbs in rural settings. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and prospective interventional study was carried out in the period 2011 through 2017 in six rural hospitals in Cambodia. The fractures were managed with locally produced external fixators and orthosis developed in 2007. Based on skills and living locations, two local surgeons and one paramedic without reconstructive surgery experience were selected to reach the top of the reconstructive ladder and perform limb salvage surgeries. This study evaluated 56 fractures using the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Score (GHOIS) for Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA and Type IIIB open fracture classification groups. Results: The primary success rate in open tibia fractures was 64.3% (95% CI, 50.3 - 76.3). The average treatment time to complete healing for all of the patients was 39.6 weeks (95% CI, 34.8 - 44.4). A percentage of 23.2% (95% CI, 13.4 - 36.7) experienced a deep infection. Fifteen of the patients had to undergo soft tissue reconstruction and 22 flaps were performed. Due to non-union, a total of 15 bone grafts were performed. All of the 56 patients in the study gained limb salvage and went back to work. Conclusion: The given fracture management program proves that low-resource countries are able to produce essential surgical tools at high quality and low price. Treatment with external fixation and functional bracing, combined with high-level training of local surgeons, demonstrates that a skilled surgical team can perform advanced limb salvage surgery in low-resource settings.

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 2981-2989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nenad B. Tajsic ◽  
Puon Sambath ◽  
Sophy Nguon ◽  
Vannara Sokh ◽  
Virak Chheang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kofi Tawiah Mensah

Introduction: Mangled extremity injuries in civilian settings are challenging conditions for the accident and emergency units of low-resource settings where salvage therapies may not be feasible or affordable for the patients. Case Report: We have described a successful case of initial conservative limb salvage management for a mangled distal left lower limb in a four-year-old male who sustained the injury when a vehicle ran over his extremity as he played by the road. The treatment approach was in contrast to the radical completion of amputation with its attendant revisions, which are associated with similar injuries with the mangled extremity severity scores of ≥ 7. Conclusions: The benefits and challenges of the limb salvage intervention were discussed based on the literature in this regard, and a recommendation was proposed while considering an initial conservative limb salvage approach in well-resuscitated children presenting early with a mangled extremity injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bikram Kesari Kar ◽  
Mukund Madhav Ojha ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Yadav ◽  
Alok Chandra Agrawal ◽  
Harshal Sakale

Introduction: In this modern era, limb reconstructive surgeries have become a standardized procedure for malignant tumor of lower limbs. We performed limb salvage surgeries for tumor around the knee with en bloc resection and subsequent reconstruction with a megaprosthesis. Methods: A total of six cases of malignant and locally aggressive tumor around the knee were operated on from 2017 to 2018, with resection and mega prosthetic reconstruction. Interpretation of functional outcome after surgery was performed with musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score. Complications such as infection, local recurrence of tumor, implant failure, and distant metastases were evaluated during each follow-up. Results: Postoperatively, one patient developed superficial infection; one local recurrence with metastasis and the rest cases were uneventful. Patients were regularly followed for atleast1 year, and none of them developed any sign of deep infection, implant failure,or loosening. At the beginning of treatment, the average MSTS score was 8.83, which showed a significant increment to 25.83 after 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Albeit few cases were operated on, we draw this inference from our short-term experience that mega prosthesis acts as a boon to orthopedic surgeons in musculoskeletal tumor management, thereby uplifting the quality of life of patients even during terminal care. Keywords: Limb salvage surgery, osteosarcoma, giant cell tumor, megaprosthesis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 079-083
Author(s):  
Lawrence Mbuagbaw ◽  
Francisca Monebenimp ◽  
Bolaji Obadeyi ◽  
Grace Bissohong ◽  
Marie-Thérèse Obama ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afework Kassu ◽  
Getnet Yimer ◽  
Solomon Benor ◽  
Kassahun Tesfaye ◽  
Yifokre Tefera ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document