scholarly journals Modelling of Solar Coronal Loops

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 661-662
Author(s):  
C. Jordan

Modelling of coronal active regions in terms of loop structures began around 1974 (see Jordan 1975) and was stimulated by images of the corona in X-rays and the uv, obtained from rocket flights. Vaiana was a pioneer in this field (see Vaiana et al. 1973). The Skylab missions provided a fuller range of imaging and spectroscopic observations, and much of the available information is still based on these data (see Orrall 1981). Since 1975 a very large number of papers have been published on the various aspects of loop structure, heating and stability (see review by Mewe 1991). Here I can mention only a few points concerning the relation between observable parameters and the energy balance and heating requirements of active region loops.

1974 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 501-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Vaiana ◽  
A. S. Krieger ◽  
J. K. Silk ◽  
A. F. Timothy ◽  
R. C. Chase ◽  
...  

Data obtained by the AS&E X-ray Telescope Experiment during the first Skylab mission have revealed a variety of temporal changes in both the form and brightness of coronal structures. Dynamical changes have been noted in active regions, in large scale coronal structures, and in coronal bright points. The coronal activity accompanying a series of Hα flares and prominence activity between 0800 and 1600 UT on 10 June 1973 in active region 137 (NOAA) at the east limb is shown in Figure 1. It is characterized by increases in the brightness and temperature of active region loops and a dramatic change in the shape and brightness of a loop structure. Figure 2 shows the reconfiguration of an apparent polar crown filament cavity between 1923 UT on 12 June 1973 and 1537 UT on 13 June 1973. A ridge of emitting material which attains a peak brightness at least four times that of the surrounding coronal structures appears within the cavity during the course of the event. Typical X-ray photographs with filters passing relatively soft X-ray wavelengths (3–32, 44–54 Å) show 90 to 100 X-ray bright points (Vaiana et al., 1973). On twelve occasions in the data from the first mission, such bright points were seen to increase in intensity by two orders of magnitude in less than 4 min. Such an event is shown in Figure 3.


1977 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 457-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Q. Orrall ◽  
Roger A. Kopp

With the advent of radio and space astronomy it became necessary to extend the definition of a center of activity or active region (AR) originally proposed by L. d’Azambuja. At IAU Symposium 35, K.O. Klepenheuer (1968) defined an AR as “The totality of all observable phenomena preceding, accompanying and following the birth of sunspots, including radio-, X-, EUV-, and particle emission.” The recognition that there are other short-lived bipolar features with a distribution similar to that of active regions (ephemeral active regions) by Harveyet al. (1975) and their identification with coronal bright points by Golub et al. (1975) suggests that the definition will have to be extended further. Active regions manifest themselves in the photosphere as sunspots and faculae; in the chromosphere as the plage and its structures; in the corona as a coronal enhancement with a complex, often loop-like internal structure. (The termenhancementwas Introduced by Billings. The original termpermanent coronal condensation, introduced by Waldemeler, only referred to the very bright enhancements and was, moreover, often confused with hissporadic coronal condensations, a flareassodated phenomena. The termcoronal active regionhas, recently also been used for the coronal extension of the AR.) In keeping with the aims of this symposium the stress of this review will be on the chromosphere and corona. Active regions are especially Important as the site of most flare-associated phenomena. Here we shall be concerned with flares only as they affect the overall energy balance. Our concern is with the “quiet” active regions that cause the slowly varying components of solar activity and provide the ambiance within which solar flares occur.


1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 252-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Rust

To appreciate the curious nature of the coronal manifestations of eruptive prominences, we must first recall how the corona around a quiescent prominence appears. The cool prominence material threads arcades of coronal loops, but is invisible in coronal lines. If one defines the corona as a million-degree gas above the chromosphere, then one must admit that there is no detectable corona where there is a filament. Simultaneous limb photographs in Ha and in coronal lines show that filaments outside of active regions reside in dark cavities in the corona. Active region filament cavities would be difficult to see because of the compact loop systems that characterize the corona there, but extrapolating from our experience with non-active region filaments, we can say, at least, that the loop arcade pattern inside active regions is the same as outside and that there is no evidence for any high-temperature, filament-shaped features in active regions.


Author(s):  
Zety Sharizat Hamidi ◽  
N.N.M. Shariff ◽  
C. Monstein

We report the timeline of the solar radio burst Type II that formed but fragmented at certain point based on the eruption of the solar flare on 13th November 2012 at 2:04:20 UT. The active region AR 1613 is one of the most active region in 2012. It is well known that the magnetic energy in the solar corona is explosively released before converted into the thermal and kinetic energy in solar flares. In this work, the Compound Astronomical Low-frequency, Low-cost Instrument for Spectroscopy Transportable Observatories (CALLIISTO) system is used in obtaining a dynamic spectrum of solar radio burst data. There are eight active regions and this is the indicator that the Sun is currently active. Most the active regions radiate a Beta radiation. The active regions 1610, 1611 and 1614 are currently the largest sunspots on the visible solar disk. There is an increasing chance for an isolated M-Class solar flare event. It is also expected that there will be a chance of an M flare, especially from AR 1614 and 1610. Although these two observations (radio and X-rays) seem to be dominant on the observational analysis, we could not directly confirmed that this is the only possibility, and we need to consider other processes to explain in detailed the injection, energy loss and the mechanism of the acceleration of the particles. In conclusion, the percentage of energy of solar flare becomes more dominant rather than the acceleration of particles through the Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) and that will be the main reason why does the harmonic structure of type II burst is not formed. This event is one fine example of tendencies solar radio burst type III, which makes the harmonic structure of solar radio burst type II fragmented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 508 (2) ◽  
pp. 1831-1841
Author(s):  
David H Brooks ◽  
Stephanie L Yardley

ABSTRACT Accurate forecasting of space weather requires knowledge of the source regions where solar energetic particles (SEP) and eruptive events originate. Recent work has linked several major SEP events in 2014, January, to specific features in the host active region (AR 11944). In particular, plasma composition measurements in and around the footpoints of hot, coronal loops in the core of the active region were able to explain the values later measured in situ by the Wind spacecraft. Due to important differences in elemental composition between SEPs and the solar wind, the magnitude of the Si/S elemental abundance ratio emerged as a key diagnostic of SEP seed population and solar wind source locations. We seek to understand if the results are typical of other active regions, even if they are not solar wind sources or SEP productive. In this paper, we use a novel composition analysis technique, together with an evolutionary magnetic field model, in a new approach to investigate a typical solar active region (AR 11150), and identify the locations of highly fractionated (high Si/S abundance ratio) plasma. Material confined near the footpoints of coronal loops, as in AR 11944, that in this case have expanded to the AR periphery, show the signature, and can be released from magnetic field opened by reconnection at the AR boundary. Since the fundamental characteristics of closed field loops being opened at the AR boundary is typical of active regions, this process is likely to be general.


1994 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
K. R. Lang

AbstractVery Large Array (VLA) observations indicate that electrons accelerated in one active region can travel along otherwise-invisible, large-scale coronal loops to trigger flares in another widely-separated active region, as well as from the magnetic loops connecting them. The VLA provides high-resolution, full-disk images of quiescent, or non-flaring, coronal loops within individual active regions (at 20 cm) and between or beyond them (at 90 cm). Both ground-based radio telescopes and spaceborne X-ray telescopes provide high-resolution images of the ubiquitous coronal loops whose hot, dense magnetically-trapped plasma emits thermal bremsstrahlung. Radio observations can be used to specify the strength and structure of the magnetic fields in the low solar corona. We find a high magnetic field strength in the million-degree plasma above large sunspots – 75 to 80 percent of the value in the underlying photospheric sunspots; as well as coronal regions of non-potential, current-amplified magnetic fields. Some long-lasting (hours) coronal radio sources found on the Sun and other active stars require nonthermal radiation and nearly continuous acceleration of energetic electrons.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Moradi ◽  
Jong Kwan Lee ◽  
Qing Tian

This paper presents a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based method that automatically segments arc- like structures of coronal loops from the intensity images of Sun’s corona. The method explores multiple U-Net architecture variants which enable segmentation of coronal loop structures of active regions from NASA’s Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) imagery. The effectiveness of the method is evaluated through experiments on both synthetic and real images, and the results show that the method segments the coronal loop structures accurately.


2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 263-264
Author(s):  
K. Sundara Raman ◽  
K. B. Ramesh ◽  
R. Selvendran ◽  
P. S. M. Aleem ◽  
K. M. Hiremath

Extended AbstractWe have examined the morphological properties of a sigmoid associated with an SXR (soft X-ray) flare. The sigmoid is cospatial with the EUV (extreme ultra violet) images and in the optical part lies along an S-shaped Hαfilament. The photoheliogram shows flux emergence within an existingδtype sunspot which has caused the rotation of the umbrae giving rise to the sigmoidal brightening.It is now widely accepted that flares derive their energy from the magnetic fields of the active regions and coronal levels are considered to be the flare sites. But still a satisfactory understanding of the flare processes has not been achieved because of the difficulties encountered to predict and estimate the probability of flare eruptions. The convection flows and vortices below the photosphere transport and concentrate magnetic field, which subsequently appear as active regions in the photosphere (Rust & Kumar 1994 and the references therein). Successive emergence of magnetic flux, twist the field, creating flare productive magnetic shear and has been studied by many authors (Sundara Ramanet al.1998 and the references therein). Hence, it is considered that the flare is powered by the energy stored in the twisted magnetic flux tubes (Kurokawa 1996 and the references therein). Rust & Kumar (1996) named the S-shaped bright coronal loops that appear in soft X-rays as ‘Sigmoids’ and concluded that this S-shaped distortion is due to the twist developed in the magnetic field lines. These transient sigmoidal features tell a great deal about unstable coronal magnetic fields, as these regions are more likely to be eruptive (Canfieldet al.1999). As the magnetic fields of the active regions are deep rooted in the Sun, the twist developed in the subphotospheric flux tube penetrates the photosphere and extends in to the corona. Thus, it is essentially favourable for the subphotospheric twist to unwind the twist and transmit it through the photosphere to the corona. Therefore, it becomes essential to make complete observational descriptions of a flare from the magnetic field changes that are taking place in different atmospheric levels of the Sun, to pin down the energy storage and conversion process that trigger the flare phenomena.


1977 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 143-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.O. Stenflo

It is well-known that solar activity is basically caused by the Interaction of magnetic fields with convection and solar rotation, resulting in a great variety of dynamic phenomena, like flares, surges, sunspots, prominences, etc. Many conferences have been devoted to solar activity, including the role of magnetic fields. Similar attention has not been paid to the role of magnetic fields for the overall dynamics and energy balance of the solar atmosphere, related to the general problem of chromospheric and coronal heating. To penetrate this problem we have to focus our attention more on the physical conditions in the ‘quiet’ regions than on the conspicuous phenomena in active regions.


Author(s):  
Gregory L. Finch ◽  
Richard G. Cuddihy

The elemental composition of individual particles is commonly measured by using energydispersive spectroscopic microanalysis (EDS) of samples excited with electron beam irradiation. Similarly, several investigators have characterized particles by using external monochromatic X-irradiation rather than electrons. However, there is little available information describing measurements of particulate characteristic X rays produced not from external sources of radiation, but rather from internal radiation contained within the particle itself. Here, we describe the low-energy (< 20 KeV) characteristic X-ray spectra produced by internal radiation self-excitation of two general types of particulate samples; individual radioactive particles produced during the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident and radioactive fused aluminosilicate particles (FAP). In addition, we compare these spectra with those generated by conventional EDS.Approximately thirty radioactive particle samples from the Chernobyl accident were on a sample of wood that was near the reactor when the accident occurred. Individual particles still on the wood were microdissected from the bulk matrix after bulk autoradiography.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document