scholarly journals Uptake of referrals for women with positive perinatal depression screening results and the effectiveness of interventions to increase uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
WQ Xue ◽  
KK Cheng ◽  
D Xu ◽  
X Jin ◽  
WJ Gong
Keyword(s):  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Perinatal Depression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Depression Screening ◽  
Site Assessment ◽  
Uptake Rates ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Aims Perinatal depression threatens the health of maternal women and their offspring. Although screening programs for perinatal depression exist, non-uptake of referral to further mental health care after screening reduces the utility of these programs. Uptake rates among women with positive screening varied widely across studies and little is known about how to improve the uptake rate. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on uptake rates, estimate the pooled rate, identify interventions to improve uptake of referral and explore the effectiveness of those interventions. Methods This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42019138095). We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Databases from database inception to January 13, 2019 and scanned reference lists of relevant researches for studies published in English or Chinese. Studies providing information on uptake rate and/or effectiveness of interventions on uptake of referral were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they did not report the details of the referral process or did not provide exact uptake rate. Data provided by observational studies and quasi-experimental studies were used to estimate the pooled uptake rate through meta-analysis. We also performed meta-regression and subgroup analyses to explore the potential source of heterogeneity. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, we conducted descriptive analyses instead of meta-analyses since there was only one randomised controlled trial (RCT). Results Of 2302 records identified, 41 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 39 observational studies (n = 9337), one quasi-experimental study (n = 43) and one RCT (n = 555). All but two studies were conducted in high-income countries. The uptake rates reported by included studies varied widely and the pooled uptake rate of referral was 43% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 35–50%) by a random-effect model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses both showed that referral to on-site assessment or treatment (60%, 95% CI 51–69%) had a significantly higher uptake rate than referral to mental health service (32%, 95% CI 23–41%) (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.13–1.52). The included RCT showed that the referral intervention significantly improved the uptake rate (p ＜ 0.01). Conclusions Almost three-fifths of women with positive screening results do not take up the referral offers after perinatal depression screening. Referral to on-site assessment and treatment may improve uptake of referral, but the quality of evidence on interventions to increase uptake was weak. More robust studies are needed, especially in low-and middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zigang Liu ◽  
Yongmei Zhao ◽  
Ming Lei ◽  
Guancong Zhao ◽  
Dongcheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Meta Regression

Objective: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the influence of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of RIPC on AKI after cardiac surgery.Methods: Relevant studies were obtained by search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. A random-effect model was used to pool the results. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to determine the source of heterogeneity.Results: Twenty-two RCTs with 5,389 patients who received cardiac surgery −2,702 patients in the RIPC group and 2,687 patients in the control group—were included. Moderate heterogeneity was detected (p for Cochrane's Q test = 0.03, I2 = 40%). Pooled results showed that RIPC significantly reduced the incidence of AKI compared with control [odds ratio (OR): 0.76, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.61–0.94, p = 0.01]. Results limited to on-pump surgery (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.95, p = 0.01) or studies with acute RIPC (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.97, p = 0.03) showed consistent results. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses indicated that study characteristics, including study design, country, age, gender, diabetic status, surgery type, use of propofol or volatile anesthetics, cross-clamp time, RIPC protocol, definition of AKI, and sample size did not significantly affect the outcome of AKI. Results of stratified analysis showed that RIPC significantly reduced the risk of mild-to-moderate AKI that did not require renal replacement therapy (RRT, OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60–0.96, p = 0.02) but did not significantly reduce the risk of severe AKI that required RRT in patients after cardiac surgery (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.50–1.07, p = 0.11).Conclusions: Current evidence supports RIPC as an effective strategy to prevent AKI after cardiac surgery, which seems to be mainly driven by the reduced mild-to-moderate AKI events that did not require RRT. Efforts are needed to determine the influences of patient characteristics, procedure, perioperative drugs, and RIPC protocol on the outcome.

The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
jingjie zhao ◽  
xinliang xu ◽  
Hualin Jiang ◽  
yi ding
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Degree Of Satisfaction ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference ◽  
Anatomy Teaching

Abstract Virtual reality (VR) is an innovation that permits the individual to discover and operate three-dimensional (3D) environment to gain practical understanding instantly. Recently, VR has been advanced as an encouraging tool in the course of clinical college. This research aimed to examine the general efficiency of VR for teaching medical anatomy. We executed a meta-analysis of randomized regulated studies of the performance of VR anatomy education. We browsed 5 databases from the year 1990 to 2019. Ultimately, 15 randomized controlled trials with a teaching outcome measure analysis were included. Tow authors separately chosen studies, extracted information, and examined the risk of bias. The primary outcomes were examination scores of the students. Secondary outcomes were the degree of satisfaction of the students. Random-effects models were used for the pooled evaluations. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was applied to assess the systematic results. The heterogeneity was determined by I2 statistics, and then was investigated by meta-regression and subgroup analyses. In this review, we screened and included fifteen randomized controlled researches (816 students). The pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that VR improves test scores comparing with other approaches (standardized mean difference [SMD]= 0.53; 95% CI 0.09–0.97; I2= 87.8%). The high homogeneity indicated that the studies were different from each other. Therefore, we carried out meta-regression as well as subgroup analyses using 7 variables (year, country, learners, course, intervention, comparator, and duration). We found that VR improves postintervention test score of anatomy comparing with other types of teaching methods. Although the findings have high internal validity and limited, because of that anatomy teaching in medical universities appears to becoming a dilemma, VR may act as an efficient way to improve the learners’ level of anatomy knowledge. Future research should assess other factors like degree of satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and adverse reactions when evaluating the teaching effectiveness of VR in anatomy.

scholarly journals The value of the post-captopril aldosterone/renin ratio for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism and the influential factors: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 147032032097203
Author(s):  
Qiao Xiang ◽  
Wen Wang ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Kai Yu ◽  
Qianrui Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Challenge Test ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Meta Regression

Objective: The procedure for the captopril challenge test (CCT) in diagnosing primary aldosteronism (PA) is not standardized. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the controversial diagnostic value and influential factors of the post-captopril aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR). Methods: We searched literature in databases for eligible studies (until October 1, 2020). We extracted information regarding study and patient characteristics, CCT methods, outcome data. We pooled studies using the random-effect model. We performed meta-regression and six pre-specified subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. Results: Nineteen studies involving 4568 subjects were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.825 (95% CI 0.804–0.844) and 0.919 (95% CI 0.908–0.928). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9487 (95% CI 0.9207–0.9767). Meta-regression revealed that heterogeneity might derive from time interval ( p = 0.0117) and study population ( p = 0.0033). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences between the subgroups stratified by the dose, posture, study region, time interval, cut-off value and study population for sensitivity and/or specificity ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Post-captopril ARR is comparably valuable for diagnosing PA at cut-offs from 12.0 to 50.0. Conducting the CCT in the supine position with 25 mg of captopril may attain greater sensitivity. Conducting the CCT in the seated position with 50 mg of captopril may attain greater specificity. A 90-min time interval may perform best in both the sensitivity and specificity.

Increased Peripheral Blood Visfatin Concentrations May Be a Risk Marker of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 825-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuling Yu ◽  
Jianwei Li ◽  
Qilei Huang ◽  
Hongbin Cai
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Risk Marker ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Artery Disease

A comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the relationship between peripheral blood visfatin concentrations and coronary artery disease (CAD) is lacking. This study is the first attempt to quantify this relationship via a meta-analysis of published observational studies in terms of weighted mean difference (WMD). Literature retrieval, article selection, and data extraction were conducted. Heterogeneity was inspected using both subgroup and meta-regression analyses. In total, 15 articles involving 1053 CAD cases and 714 controls were included. Overall, peripheral blood visfatin concentrations were significantly higher in CAD cases than in controls (WMD: 4.72 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.97-6.47; P < .001), with significant heterogeneity and publication bias. Six studies were theoretically missing based on filled funnel plot, and considering the impact of these missing studies still detected a significant overall mean difference in visfatin (WMD: 2.82 ng/mL; 95% CI: 2.22-3.58; P < .001; number of studies: 21). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses indicated age, body mass index, race, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were identified as possible causes of heterogeneity. In conclusion, our findings suggest that increased peripheral blood visfatin concentrations may be a risk marker of CAD.

scholarly journals Is Sensory Loss an Understudied Risk Factor for Frailty? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 2461-2470
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan ◽  
Ryan Eyn Kidd Man ◽  
Alfred Tau Liang Gan ◽  
Eva K Fenwick ◽  
Varshini Varadaraj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Longitudinal Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sensory Loss ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensory Impairments ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Age-related sensory loss and frailty are common conditions among older adults, but epidemiologic research on their possible links has been inconclusive. Clarifying this relationship is important because sensory loss may be a clinically relevant risk factor for frailty. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 3 databases for observational studies investigating 4 sensory impairments—vision (VI), hearing (HI), smell (SI), and taste (TI)—and their relationships with frailty. We meta-analyzed the cross-sectional associations of VI/HI each with pre-frailty and frailty, investigated sources of heterogeneity using meta-regression and subgroup analyses, and assessed publication bias using Egger’s test. Results We included 17 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies in our review (N = 34,085) from 766 records. Our cross-sectional meta-analyses found that HI and VI were, respectively, associated with 1.5- to 2-fold greater odds of pre-frailty and 2.5- to 3-fold greater odds of frailty. Our results remained largely unchanged after subgroup analyses and meta-regression, though the association between HI and pre-frailty was no longer significant in 2 subgroups which lacked sufficient studies. We did not detect publication bias. Longitudinal studies largely found positive associations between VI/HI and frailty progression from baseline robustness, though they were inconclusive about frailty progression from baseline pre-frailty. Sparse literature and heterogenous methods precluded meta-analyses and conclusions on the SI/TI–frailty relationships. Conclusions Our meta-analyses demonstrate significant cross-sectional associations between VI/HI with pre-frailty and frailty. Our review also highlights knowledge gaps on the directionality and modifiability of these relationships and the impact of SI/TI and multiple sensory impairments on frailty.

The angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism and development of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1726-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hadi Zafarmand ◽  
Marie-Elise Nijdam ◽  
Arie Franx ◽  
Diederick E Grobbee ◽  
Michiel L Bots
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Angiotensinogen Gene ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
M235t Polymorphism

scholarly journals Association of antenatal corticosteroids with morbidity and mortality among preterm multiple gestations: meta-analysis of observational studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e047651
Author(s):  
Dongxin Lin ◽  
Dazhi Fan ◽  
Gengdong Chen ◽  
Caihong Luo ◽  
Xiaoling Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Periventricular Leukomalacia ◽  
Intraventricular Haemorrhage ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Multiple Gestations ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) on morbidity and mortality among preterm multiple pregnancies.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies investigating the outcomes among preterm multiple gestations following to ACS, from their inception to 1 November 2020. Two authors independently performed the study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. The primary outcomes were respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and mortality and secondary outcomes included intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pooled ORs were obtained using random effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed to explain heterogeneity by ACS completeness, administration-to-delivery intervals (≤7 days) and single or multicentre.ResultsA total of 16 observational studies with 36 973 newborns were included in the meta-analysis. ACS treatment was associated with a reduction in RDS (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.82; I2=91.4%; p<0.001), mortality (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.81; I2=85.9%; p<0.001), IVH (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; I2=77.4%; p<0.001) and PVL (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92; I2=75.5%; p<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed ACS completeness, administration-to-delivery interval and multicentre study affected these associations.DiscussionACS may be beneficial for reducing the risks of RDS, mortality, IVH and PVL among preterm multiple gestations. The efficacy of ACS could be affected by ACS completeness and administration-to-delivery. More robust evidence on the efficacy of ACS treatment among multiple gestations is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document