Examining Masculinity Norms, Problem Drinking, and Athletic Involvement as Predictors of Sexual Aggression in College Men.

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Locke ◽  
James R. Mahalik
1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Ullman ◽  
George Karabatsos ◽  
Mary P. Koss

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 565-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
COURTNEY C. ABERLE ◽  
ROBERT P. LITTLEFIELD

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Thompson ◽  
Elizabeth J. Cracco

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
RaeAnn Anderson ◽  
Rachel L. Wandrey ◽  
Samuel C. Klossner ◽  
Shawn P Cahill ◽  
Douglas L. Delahanty

Sexual minority men are at increased risk for sexual victimization at all ages compared to heterosexual men; yet, most research on victimization focuses on the experiences of heterosexual women. This study compares the rates of multiple forms of interpersonal violence (violence perpetrated by another person) in a sample of sexual minority status college men and heterosexual men on campus. Participants (n = 53 sexual minority men, n = 364 heterosexual) completed an anonymous web survey containing measures of childhood abuse, adolescent/adult sexual victimization, adolescent/adult sexual aggression, intimate partner victimization and aggression, rape empathy, PTSD symptoms, and social desirability. ANCOVAs, covarying for demographic characteristics and social desirability, revealed that sexual minority men were more likely to experience the most severe forms of adolescent/adult sexual victimization as well as childhood emotional abuse. There were no differences in rates of sexual aggression or intimate partner violence. Sexual minority men who experienced sexual assault were more likely to report being assaulted by other men than were heterosexual men. Regarding self-reported sexual aggression, we found no differences in rates of sexual aggression. Sexual minority men had higher levels of rape empathy and rape acknowledgment than heterosexual men. Our results indicate sexual minority men are at higher risk than heterosexual men for the most severe forms of sexual victimization and experience different psychological consequences of sexual victimization indicating there may be a need for specialized intervention services.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Thompson ◽  
Elizabeth J. Cracco

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Testa ◽  
Joseph H. Hoffman ◽  
Joseph F. Lucke ◽  
Colleen E. Pagnan

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID S. KOSSON ◽  
JENNIFER C. KELLY ◽  
JACQUELYN W. WHITE

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Mouilso ◽  
Karen S. Calhoun ◽  
Thomas G. Rosenbloom

Although impulsivity has been consistently linked to perpetration of sexual aggression, results lack clarity because they do not account for the substantial heterogeneity associated with the construct. The UPPS-P model (Lynam, Smith, Whiteside, & Cyders, 2006), which was proposed to clarify the multidimensional nature of impulsivity, has yet to be applied to sexual aggression. We measured UPPS-P Impulsivity in a sample of male college students who also self-reported on perpetration of sexual aggression. As predicted, impulsivity distinguished perpetrators from nonperpetrators. Perpetrators scored higher than nonperpetrators on Negative Urgency, Positive Urgency, and lack of Premeditation. Results suggest that the impulsivity traits most relevant to sexual aggression are the tendency to act impulsively when experiencing intense emotions (Positive and Negative Urgency) and lack of forethought and planning (lack of Premeditation).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document