Importance Ratings: Does Rater Age Make a Difference?

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Surley ◽  
Carlina Cinciripini ◽  
Kristin Orsak ◽  
Alison Cooper ◽  
Kristi M. Addington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Importance Ratings

Gender Differences in Importance Ratings in 360 Feedback Surveys

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Roberto ◽  
Celesta Taylor ◽  
Ashleigh Schwab ◽  
Lloyd Lin ◽  
Taylor Paige Drummond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
360 Feedback ◽  
Importance Ratings

scholarly journals Quality of life in urologic cancer patients: importance of and satisfaction with specific quality of life domains

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Leuteritz ◽  
Diana Richter ◽  
Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf ◽  
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg ◽  
Andreas Hinz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Importance Ratings ◽  
Subjective Importance

Abstract Purpose Quality of life (QoL) has been the subject of increasing interest in oncology. Most examinations of QoL have focused on health-related QoL, while other factors often remain unconsidered. Moreover, QoL questionnaires implicitly assume that the subjective importance of the various QoL domains is identical from one patient to the next. The aim of this study was to analyze QoL in a broader sense, considering the subjective importance of the QoL components. Methods A sample of 173 male urologic patients was surveyed twice: once while hospitalized (t1) and once again 3 months later (t2). Patients completed the Questions on Life Satisfaction questionnaire (FLZ-M), which includes satisfaction and importance ratings for eight dimensions of QoL. A control group was taken from the general population (n = 477). Results Health was the most important QoL dimension for both the patient and the general population groups. While satisfaction with health was low in the patient group, the satisfaction ratings of the other seven domains were higher in the patient group than in the general population. The satisfaction with the domain partnership/sexuality showed a significant decline from t1 to t2. Multiple regression analyses showed that the domains health and income contributed most strongly to the global QoL score at t2 in the patient group. Conclusion Health is not the only relevant category when assessing QoL in cancer patients; social relationships and finances are pertinent as well. Importance ratings contribute to a better understanding of the relevance of the QoL dimensions for the patients.

scholarly journals PRIORITIZATION OF QUALITY CARE CRITERIA TO DELIVER QUALITY SERVICE USING DEMATEL

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja Rub Nawaz ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Graphical Representation ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Quality Service ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Importance Ratings ◽  
Multiple Variables

Purpose:-Hospitals are very vital as an element in Quality Care delivery and their evaluation in these terms on perpetual basis are much needed as these organizations contribute in improving health outcomes for general people. Hospitals, especially privately owned, are also run like businesses these days to remain competitive in the respective arena. The environment and situation faced by many hospitals are often complicated and which definitely requires insightful solutions to steer the direction of these businesses. This study was focused on the application of group decision-making tool, DEMATEL as one of the valid methods in Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Methodology:- The study was exploratory in nature and efforts were made to justify by highlighting the criteria prioritization procedure to be undertaken by any healthcare organization. A slight deviation from the standard four-steps of DEMATEL, a course of action was created in the shape of an eight-step procedure to exhibit a practical approach rather than mathematical theory approach. In order to make it more empirical in nature, a five-stage research framework was also devised and acted upon with the help of three separate questionnaires. Avedis Donabedian’s (1988) Quality Care framework was followed and multiple variables were devised, importance ratings were collected from patients on these devised variables and after reduction of variables in to manageable latent factors, called criteria in the study, DEMATEL method was applied to depict the prioritization of Quality Care criteria for the delivery of quality service via digraph. Findings:-The graphical representation through digraph showed that criteria were vertically divided in two halves as C1, C5, and C4 are shown as criteria influencing the lower half criteria C3, C6, and C2. The horizontal span of digraph reflected the importance of criteria prioritized and showed C1 criterion as the most important and C2 criterion with the least importance. Implications:-The prioritization of the criteria along with their cause and effect distribution gave an insight into the constitution framework of localized healthcare services of Karachi, Pakistan

Recall of importance ratings of completed and uncompleted tasks as a function of depression

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Johnson ◽  
Thomas P. Petzel ◽  
Linda M. Hartney ◽  
Russell A. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Importance Ratings

scholarly journals OLDER ADULTS’ OPINIONS ON DIFFERENT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S342-S343
Author(s):  
Sara A Freed ◽  
Lesley A Ross ◽  
Despina Stavrinos
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Importance Rating ◽  
Collision Warning ◽  
Crash Avoidance ◽  
Importance Ratings ◽  
Vehicle Technology ◽  
Vehicle Technologies ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Collision Warning Systems

Abstract Vehicle technologies have the potential to greatly improve road safety. Given normative changes in cognitive, sensory and physical functioning, older drivers may particularly benefit from such technologies. However, little research has examined older adults’ opinions of vehicle technologies, descriptive differences of individuals more likely to have positive opinions of vehicle technologies, and how their opinions may differ depending on the type of vehicle technology. The current study examined older adults’ opinions on vehicle technology in a sample of 72 adults between 65 and 85 years (M = 72.3, SD = 5.36, 48% women). Participants were asked, “How important is [parking assistance, crash avoidance systems, early collision warnings, built-in GPS] in choosing a new vehicle?” on a scale from 1 (“not at all”) to 5 (“must have”). On average, participants rated built-in GPS as the most important (M = 3.81, SD=1.10) with parking assist as the least important (M=1.86, SD=1.13). We used correlational analyses to examine the association between demographic and personality and importance ratings. Women were more likely to rate greater importance for built-in GPS than men (r=.35, p<.05). Age, education, self-reported driving quality, and self-reported average weekly driving miles were not significantly associated with importance rating. In terms of personality, only higher levels of extraversion were associated with more positive ratings of early collision warning systems (r=.24, p<.05). Vehicle technology design and education should take older adults’ preferences into account and consider individual differences, and future work should examine other predictors of vehicle technology preferences such as functional performance.

scholarly journals Application of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Assignment Place Selection

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Mustafa Soba ◽  
Yusuf Ersoy ◽  
Ayşenur Tarakcioğlu Altınay ◽  
Birol Erkan ◽  
Eser Şik
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Preference Order ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Importance Ratings ◽  
Promethee Method ◽  
Grey Relational ◽  
Selection Of

The aim of this study is to ensure that the location selection of the officers of the personnel class in the Land Forces Command is effective and needs to be met to determine the criteria used in the selection of the place of appointment or which is the most important and to reveal the preference order to the officers making the choice. In this survey, a face-to-face interview technique and 10 subquestionnaires of captain majors were applied. In the questionnaire technique, the weights of the criteria were determined by using the Max100 method, then the values of the criteria were determined by the Max100 method, and the alternatives were graded and ranked by using grey relational analysis (GRA) method and PROMETHEE method which are multicriteria decision-making techniques. As a result of this analysis, the assignment locations are listed and the importance ratings of the criteria used in the selection of the assignment location are determined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document