Disentangling contributions of process elements to the fair-process effect

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Sinclair ◽  
Neil M. A. Hauenstein
Keyword(s):  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
Process Elements

How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

1997 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1034-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees van den Bos ◽  
E. Allan Lind ◽  
Riël Vermunt ◽  
Henk A. M. Wilke
Keyword(s):  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

Interactional justice and the fair process effect: The role of outcome uncertainty

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Hui ◽  
Kevin Au ◽  
Xiande Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

The Fair Process Effect in the Classroom: Reducing the Influence of Grades on Student Evaluations of Teachers

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-184
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Tripp ◽  
Lixin Jiang ◽  
Kristine Olson ◽  
Maja Graso
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Teaching Evaluations ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Student Evaluations Of Teachers ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Evaluation Of Teaching ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
The Relationship

Research findings tend to confirm anecdotal observations that instructors’ teaching evaluations are influenced by students’ grades, making some instructors feel pressured to reduce the academic rigor of their course in an attempt to get higher evaluations. To reduce this pressure, the current study tested whether distributive justice may explain the relationship between grades and student evaluation of teaching (SET) and how the fair process effect may moderate the relationship between distributive justice perceptions regarding grades and SET. Relying on the extant literature of procedural justice, we hypothesized that when students perceive no fair process that determines their grades, then: (a) the relationship between distributive justice perceptions and SET will be stronger and (b) the indirect effect of grades on SET via distributive justice perceptions will be stronger. Conversely, under conditions of strong fair process perceptions, these relationships will be attenuated. Using a survey of undergraduates’ perceptions of course fairness, we found support for our proposed hypotheses. We discuss the implications of our findings for higher education faculty.

scholarly journals Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect.

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees van den Bos ◽  
Jan Bruins ◽  
Henk A. M. Wilke ◽  
Elske Dronkert
Keyword(s):  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

Fair Process Effect in the Classroom: Eliminating the Grades and Student-Evaluations Correlation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 16542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Tripp ◽  
Lixin Jiang ◽  
Maja Graso ◽  
Kristine J Olson
Keyword(s):  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

scholarly journals An empirical study on fair process effect

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Toshiaki AOKI
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Study ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

Investing in Interactional Justice: A Study of the Fair Process Effect within a Hospitality Failure Context

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thérèse A. Collie ◽  
Beverley Sparks ◽  
Graham Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Fair Process Effect

scholarly journals The “ironic” fair process effect: A perceived fair naturalization procedure spurs anti-immigration attitudes through increased host national identification among naturalized citizens

2020 ◽  
pp. 136843022097548
Author(s):  
Kim Dierckx ◽  
Emanuele Politi ◽  
Barbara Valcke ◽  
Jasper van Assche ◽  
Alain Van Hiel
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Effect Study ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Mediation Model ◽  
Present Contribution ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Naturalized Citizens ◽  
Immigration Attitudes ◽  
Fair Process Effect ◽  
Host Nation

A growing body of research has shown that naturalized citizens’ attitudes towards immigration worsen following citizenship acquisition. Accordingly, these socially mobile individuals tend to distance themselves from their former immigrant ingroup. The present contribution explains such self–group distancing coping strategy in terms of an “ironic” procedural fairness effect. Study 1 ( N = 566), a survey conducted among naturalized Swiss citizens, showed that fairness perceptions with respect to the naturalization process were indeed associated with stronger anti-immigration attitudes, and that this relationship was mediated by identification with the host nation. Next, two experiments were conducted to demonstrate the causality of the hypothesized mediation model. In Study 2 (Experiment 1; N = 248), fairness of the admission procedure (accurate vs. inaccurate) increased identification with a desirable group. In Study 3 (Experiment 2; N = 141), administration of a national identity prime evoked stronger anti-immigration attitudes. Taken together, our findings highlight a somewhat “dark side” of procedural fairness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document