Clinicopathological features and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in a prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer

Author(s):  
Yaileen D. Guzmán-Arocho ◽  
Shoshana M. Rosenberg ◽  
Judy E. Garber ◽  
Hilde Vardeh ◽  
Philip D. Poorvu ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1509-1509
Author(s):  
B. E. Kiely ◽  
M. A. Jenkins ◽  
J. M. McKinley ◽  
M. L. Friedlander ◽  
P. C. Weideman ◽  
...  

1509 Background: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) reduces contralateral breast cancer (BC) risk by up to 97%. Few studies have examined the prevalence and predictors of CRRM in BC patients at high familial risk of a second primary BC. Methods: Participants were women with unilateral BC and a strong family history of the disease, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Data were collected by interview, self-administered questionnaire, and review of pathology and surgical reports. Associations between having CRRM and potential predictors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 1018 study participants (median follow-up 5.5 years), 154 (15%) underwent CRRM. The median time from initial BC to CRRM was 1 year. More likely to undergo CRRM were women who were younger at the time of their BC diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.94 per year of age, p < 0.001), those diagnosed more recently (OR = 1.16 per calendar year, p < 0.001), those who underwent mastectomy rather than breast conservation as their initial definitive BC treatment (OR = 5.2, p < 0.001) and those who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (OR = 3.4, p < 0.001). BRCA1/2 mutation status and tumor characteristics were not independently associated with CRRM uptake. A contralateral BC event occurred in 177 (20.5%) of the 864 women who did not have CRRM, compared with one chest wall event (0.6%) in the 154 women post-CRRM. Conclusions: Younger women with more recently diagnosed BC treated with mastectomy were most likely to elect CRRM. BRCA1/2 mutation status and the competing risk of BC recurrence and death did not appear to influence decision making. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document