CLUSTER guide RNAs enable precise and efficient RNA editing with endogenous ADAR enzymes in vivo

Author(s):  
Philipp Reautschnig ◽  
Nicolai Wahn ◽  
Jacqueline Wettengel ◽  
Annika E. Schulz ◽  
Ngadhnjim Latifi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5878-5884
Author(s):  
B K Adler ◽  
M E Harris ◽  
K I Bertrand ◽  
S L Hajduk

Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial transcripts can be posttranscriptionally processed by uridine addition or deletion. With editing of mRNAs, uridine addition and deletion create precisely altered reading frames. The addition of nonencoded uridines to mitochondrial guide RNAs results in a less precise modification. Although uridines are specifically added to the 3' termini, their number varies, which results in heterogeneous oligo(U) tails on guide RNAs. In this paper, we show that the mitochondrial 9S and 12S rRNAs are also modified by uridine addition. These modifications appear to have aspects in common with both RNA editing and oligo(U) tail formation. Metabolic labeling studies with intact mitochondria and [alpha-32P]UTP, in the absence of transcription, demonstrated the posttranscriptional timing of the event. T1 RNase comparison analyses of cytidine 3',5'-[5'-32P]biphosphate 3'-end-labeled and [alpha-32P]UTP metabolically labeled rRNAs, along with direct RNA sequencing of the 3' termini, identified the site of uridine addition and revealed the creation of an oligo(U) tail for both rRNAs. 12S and 9S rRNAs hybrid selected from total cell RNA exhibited the same modification, demonstrating the presence of this processing in vivo. Moreover, only 3'-poly(U)-tailed 9S and 12S rRNAs were detected in total cellular and mitochondrial RNAs, which suggests that they are the most abundant and probable mature forms. The 12S and 9S rRNA oligo(U) tails differed significantly from each other, with the 12S having a heterogeneous tail of 2 to 17 uridines and the 9S having a tail of precisely 11 uridines. The mechanism of formation and the function of the rRNA poly(U) tails remain to be determined.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruva Katrekar ◽  
James Yen ◽  
Yichen Xiang ◽  
Anushka Saha ◽  
Dario Meluzzi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAkin to short-hairpin RNAs and antisense oligonucleotides which efficaciously recruit endogenous cellular machinery such as Argonaute and RNase H to enable targeted RNA knockdown, simple long antisense guide RNAs (1) can recruit endogenous adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) to enable programmable A-to-I RNA editing, without requiring co-delivery of any exogenous proteins. This approach is highly specific, however the efficiency is typically lower than observed with enzyme overexpression. Conjecturing this was due in part to the short half-life and residence times of guide RNAs, here we engineer highly stable circular ADAR recruiting guide RNAs (cadRNAs), which can be delivered not only by genetically encoding on DNA vectors, but also via transfection of RNA molecules transcribed in vitro. Using these cadRNAs, we observed robust RNA editing across multiple sites and cell lines, in both untranslated and coding regions of RNAs, vastly improved efficiency and durability of RNA editing, and high transcriptome-wide specificity. High transcript-level specificity was achieved by further engineering to reduce bystander editing. Additionally, in vivo delivery of cadRNAs via adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) enabled robust 38% RNA editing of the mPCSK9 transcript in C57BL/6J mice livers, and 12% UAG-to-UGG RNA correction of the amber nonsense mutation in the IDUA-W392X mouse model of mucopolysaccharidosis type I-Hurler (MPS I-H) syndrome. Taken together, cadRNAs enable efficacious programmable RNA editing with application across diverse protein modulation and gene therapeutic settings.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Kumar ◽  
Pawan K. Doharey ◽  
Shelly Gulati ◽  
Joshua Meehan ◽  
Mary G. Martinez ◽  
...  

AbstractUridylate insertion/deletion RNA editing inTrypanosoma bruceiis a complex system that is not found in humans, so there is interest in targeting this system for drug development. This system uses hundreds of small non-coding guide RNAs (gRNAs) to modify the mitochondrial mRNA transcriptome. This process occurs in holo-editosomes that assemble several macromoleculartransfactors around mRNA including the RNA-free RNA editing core complex (RECC) and auxiliary ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. Yet, the regulatory mechanisms of editing remain obscure. The enzymatic accessory RNP complex, termed the REH2C, includes mRNA substrates and products, the multi-domain 240 kDa RNA Editing Helicase 2 (REH2) and an intriguing 8-zinc finger protein termed REH2-Associated Factor 1 (H2F1). Both of these proteins are essential in editing. REH2 is a member of the DExH/RHA subfamily of RNA helicases with a conserved C-terminus that includes a regulatory OB-fold domain. In trypanosomes,H2F1 recruits REH2 to the editing apparatus, andH2F1 downregulation causes REH2 fragmentation. Our systematic mutagenesis dissected determinants in REH2 andH2F1 for the assembly of REH2C, the stability of REH2, and the RNA-mediated association of REH2C with other editingtransfactors. We identified functional OB-fold amino acids in eukaryotic DExH/RHA helicases that are conserved in REH2 and that impact the assembly and interactions of REH2C.H2F1 upregulation stabilized REH2in vivo. Mutation of the core cysteines or basic amino acids in individual zinc fingers affected the stabilizing property ofH2F1 but not its interactions with other examined editing components. This result suggests that most, if not all, fingers may contribute to REH2 stabilization. Finally, a recombinant REH2 (240 kDa) established that the full-length protein is abona fideRNA helicase with ATP-dependent unwinding activity. REH2 is the only DExH/RHA-type helicase in kinetoplastid holo-editosomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 4943
Author(s):  
Tetsuto Tohama ◽  
Matomo Sakari ◽  
Toshifumi Tsukahara

Site-directed RNA editing (SDRE) technologies have great potential for treating genetic diseases caused by point mutations. Our group and other researchers have developed SDRE methods utilizing adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) and guide RNAs recruiting ADARs to target RNAs bearing point mutations. In general, efficient SDRE relies on introducing numerous guide RNAs relative to target genes. However, achieving a large ratio is not possible for gene therapy applications. In order to achieve a realistic ratio, we herein developed a system that can introduce an equal number of genes and guide RNAs into cultured cells using a fusion protein comprising an ADAR fragment and a plasmid vector containing one copy of each gene on a single construct. We transfected the single construct into HEK293T cells and achieved relatively high efficiency (up to 42%). The results demonstrate that efficient SDRE is possible when the copy number is similar for all three factors (target gene, guide RNA, and ADAR enzyme). This method is expected to be capable of highly efficient gene repair in vivo, making it applicable for gene therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (12) ◽  
pp. 10329-10340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara L. Zimmer ◽  
Sarah M. McEvoy ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Jun Qu ◽  
Laurie K. Read

RNA turnover and RNA editing are essential for regulation of mitochondrial gene expression in Trypanosoma brucei. RNA turnover is controlled in part by RNA 3′ adenylation and uridylation status, with trans-acting factors also impacting RNA homeostasis. However, little is known about the mitochondrial degradation machinery or its regulation in T. brucei. We have identified a mitochondrial exoribonuclease, TbRND, whose expression is highly up-regulated in the insect proliferative stage of the parasite. TbRND shares sequence similarity with RNase D family enzymes but differs from all reported members of this family in possessing a CCHC zinc finger domain. In vitro, TbRND exhibits 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease activity, with specificity toward uridine homopolymers, including the 3′ oligo(U) tails of guide RNAs (gRNAs) that provide the sequence information for RNA editing. Several lines of evidence generated from RNAi-mediated knockdown and overexpression cell lines indicate that TbRND functions in gRNA metabolism in vivo. First, TbRND depletion results in gRNA tails extended by 2–3 nucleotides on average. Second, overexpression of wild type but not catalytically inactive TbRND results in a substantial decrease in the total gRNA population and a consequent inhibition of RNA editing. The observed effects on the gRNA population are specific as rRNAs, which are also 3′-uridylated, are unaffected by TbRND depletion or overexpression. Finally, we show that gRNA binding proteins co-purify with TbRND. In summary, TbRND is a novel 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease that appears to have evolved a function highly specific to the mitochondrion of trypanosomes.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5878-5884 ◽  
Author(s):  
B K Adler ◽  
M E Harris ◽  
K I Bertrand ◽  
S L Hajduk

Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial transcripts can be posttranscriptionally processed by uridine addition or deletion. With editing of mRNAs, uridine addition and deletion create precisely altered reading frames. The addition of nonencoded uridines to mitochondrial guide RNAs results in a less precise modification. Although uridines are specifically added to the 3' termini, their number varies, which results in heterogeneous oligo(U) tails on guide RNAs. In this paper, we show that the mitochondrial 9S and 12S rRNAs are also modified by uridine addition. These modifications appear to have aspects in common with both RNA editing and oligo(U) tail formation. Metabolic labeling studies with intact mitochondria and [alpha-32P]UTP, in the absence of transcription, demonstrated the posttranscriptional timing of the event. T1 RNase comparison analyses of cytidine 3',5'-[5'-32P]biphosphate 3'-end-labeled and [alpha-32P]UTP metabolically labeled rRNAs, along with direct RNA sequencing of the 3' termini, identified the site of uridine addition and revealed the creation of an oligo(U) tail for both rRNAs. 12S and 9S rRNAs hybrid selected from total cell RNA exhibited the same modification, demonstrating the presence of this processing in vivo. Moreover, only 3'-poly(U)-tailed 9S and 12S rRNAs were detected in total cellular and mitochondrial RNAs, which suggests that they are the most abundant and probable mature forms. The 12S and 9S rRNA oligo(U) tails differed significantly from each other, with the 12S having a heterogeneous tail of 2 to 17 uridines and the 9S having a tail of precisely 11 uridines. The mechanism of formation and the function of the rRNA poly(U) tails remain to be determined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Nakanishi ◽  
Aya Maekawa ◽  
Mariko Suzuki ◽  
Hirotaka Tabata ◽  
Kumiko Sato ◽  
...  

AbstractSimultaneous expression of multiplex guide RNAs (gRNAs) is valuable for knockout of multiple genes and also for effective disruption of a gene by introducing multiple deletions. We developed a method of Tetraplex-guide Tandem for construction of cosmids containing four and eight multiplex gRNA-expressing units in one step utilizing lambda in vitro packaging. Using this method, we produced an adenovirus vector (AdV) containing four multiplex-gRNA units for two double-nicking sets. Unexpectedly, the AdV could stably be amplified to the scale sufficient for animal experiments with no detectable lack of the multiplex units. When the AdV containing gRNAs targeting the H2-Aa gene and an AdV expressing Cas9 nickase were mixed and doubly infected to mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, deletions were observed in more than 80% of the target gene even using double-nicking strategy. Indels were also detected in about 20% of the target gene at two sites in newborn mouse liver cells by intravenous injection. Interestingly, when one double-nicking site was disrupted, the other was simultaneously disrupted, implying that two genes in the same cell may simultaneously be disrupted in the AdV system. The AdVs expressing four multiplex gRNAs could offer simultaneous knockout of four genes or two genes by double-nicking cleavages with low off-target effect.


2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 6726-6734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Miyamoto ◽  
Junichi Obokata ◽  
Masahiro Sugiura

ABSTRACT RNA editing in higher-plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversions at specific sites. Although in vivo analyses have been performed, little is known about the biochemical aspects of chloroplast editing reactions. Here we improved our original in vitro system and devised a procedure for preparing active chloroplast extracts not only from tobacco plants but also from pea plants. Using our tobacco in vitro system, cis-acting elements were defined for psbE and petB mRNAs. Distinct proteins were found to bind specifically to each cis-element, a 56-kDa protein to the psbE site and a 70-kDa species to the petB site. Pea chloroplasts lack the corresponding editing site in psbE since T is already present in the DNA. Parallel in vitro analyses with tobacco and pea extracts revealed that the pea plant has no editing activity for psbE mRNAs and lacks the 56-kDa protein, whereas petB mRNAs are edited and the 70-kDa protein is also present. Therefore, coevolution of an editing site and its cognate trans-factor was demonstrated biochemically in psbE mRNA editing between tobacco and pea plants.


2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. S106-S115 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN MROWKA ◽  
ANDREAS SCHEDL

Abstract.Normal development of the kidney is a highly complex process that requires precise orchestration of proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. In the past few years, a number of genes that regulate these processes, and hence play pivotal roles in kidney development, have been identified. The Wilms' tumor suppressor geneWT1has been shown to be one of these essential regulators of kidney development, and mutations in this gene result in the formation of tumors and developmental abnormalities such as the Denys-Drash and Frasier syndromes. A fascinating aspect of theWT1gene is the multitude of isoforms produced from its genomic locus. In this review, our current understanding of the structural features ofWT1, how they modulate the transcriptional and post-transcriptional activities of the protein, and how mutations affecting individual isoforms can lead to diseased kidneys is summarized. In addition, results from transgenic experiments, which have yielded important findings regarding the function of WT1in vivo, are discussed. Finally, data on the unusual feature of RNA editing ofWT1transcripts are presented, and the relevance of RNA editing for the normal functioning of the WT1 protein in the kidney is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document