scholarly journals Clinical and biological markers for predicting ARDS and outcome in septic patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Villar ◽  
Rubén Herrán-Monge ◽  
Elena González-Higueras ◽  
Miryam Prieto-González ◽  
Alfonso Ambrós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Therapeutic Trials ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
And Biological Markers

AbstractSepsis is a common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with a high mortality. A panel of biomarkers (BMs) to identify septic patients at risk for developing ARDS, or at high risk of death, would be of interest for selecting patients for therapeutic trials, which could improve ARDS diagnosis and treatment, and survival chances in sepsis and ARDS. We measured nine protein BMs by ELISA in serum from 232 adult septic patients at diagnosis (152 required invasive mechanical ventilation and 72 had ARDS). A panel including the BMs RAGE, CXCL16 and Ang-2, plus PaO2/FiO2, was good in predicting ARDS (area under the curve = 0.88 in total septic patients). Best performing panels for ICU death are related to the presence of ARDS, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and pulmonary/extrapulmonary origin of sepsis. In all cases, the use of BMs improved the prediction by clinical markers. Our study confirms the relevance of RAGE, Ang-2, IL-1RA and SP-D, and is novel supporting the inclusion of CXCL16, in BMs panels for predicting ARDS diagnosis and ARDS and sepsis outcome.

scholarly journals Association between lung compliance phenotypes and mortality in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 686-694
Author(s):  
Ser Hon Puah ◽  
Matthew Edward Cove ◽  
Jason Phua ◽  
Amit Kansal ◽  
Jonathen Venkatachalam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Lung Compliance ◽  
High Compliance ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Risk Of Death

ABSTRACT Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 is associated with a high mortality rate, though outcomes of the different lung compliance phenotypes are unclear. We aimed to measure lung compliance and examine other factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. Methods: Adult patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required invasive mechanical ventilation at 8 hospitals in Singapore were prospectively enrolled. Factors associated with both mortality and differences between high (<40mL/cm H2O) and low (<40mL/cm H2O) compliance were analysed. Results: A total of 102 patients with COVID-19 who required invasive mechanical ventilation were analysed; 15 (14.7%) did not survive. Non-survivors were older (median 70 years, interquartile range [IQR] 67–75 versus median 61 years, IQR 52–66; P<0.01), and required a longer duration of ventilation (26 days, IQR 12–27 vs 8 days, IQR 5–15; P<0.01) and intensive care unit support (26 days, IQR 11–30 vs 11.5 days, IQR 7–17.3; P=0.01), with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (15 patients [100%] vs 40 patients [46%]; P<0.01). There were 67 patients who had lung compliance data; 24 (35.8%) were classified as having high compliance and 43 (64.2%) as having low compliance. Mortality was higher in patients with high compliance (33.3% vs 11.6%; P=0.03), and was associated with a drop in compliance at day 7 (-9.3mL/cm H2O (IQR -4.5 to -15.4) vs 0.2mL/cm H2O (4.7 to -5.2) P=0.04). Conclusion: COVID-19 ARDS patients with higher compliance on the day of intubation and a longitudinal decrease over time had a higher risk of death. Keywords: ARDS, COVID-19-associated respiratory failure, high-flow nasal cannula therapy, HFNC, post-intubation, ventilation strategies

scholarly journals Identification of persistent and resolving subphenotypes of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in two independent cohorts

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha A. Sathe ◽  
Leila R. Zelnick ◽  
Carmen Mikacenic ◽  
Eric D. Morrell ◽  
Pavan K. Bhatraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Therapeutic Trials

Abstract Background Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, but its heterogeneity challenges the identification of effective therapies. Defining subphenotypes with distinct prognoses or biologic features can improve therapeutic trials, but prior work has focused on ARDS, which excludes many acute HRF patients. We aimed to characterize persistent and resolving subphenotypes in the broader HRF population. Methods In this secondary analysis of 2 independent prospective ICU cohorts, we included adults with acute HRF, defined by invasive mechanical ventilation and PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio ≤ 300 on cohort enrollment (n = 768 in the discovery cohort and n = 1715 in the validation cohort). We classified patients as persistent HRF if still requiring mechanical ventilation with PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio ≤ 300 on day 3 following ICU admission, or resolving HRF if otherwise. We estimated relative risk of 28-day hospital mortality associated with persistent HRF, compared to resolving HRF, using generalized linear models. We also estimated fold difference in circulating biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial activation on cohort enrollment among persistent HRF compared to resolving HRF. Finally, we stratified our analyses by ARDS to understand whether this was driving differences between persistent and resolving HRF. Results Over 50% developed persistent HRF in both the discovery (n = 386) and validation (n = 1032) cohorts. Persistent HRF was associated with higher risk of death relative to resolving HRF in both the discovery (1.68-fold, 95% CI 1.11, 2.54) and validation cohorts (1.93-fold, 95% CI 1.50, 2.47), after adjustment for age, sex, chronic respiratory illness, and acute illness severity on enrollment (APACHE-III in discovery, APACHE-II in validation). Patients with persistent HRF displayed higher biomarkers of inflammation (interleukin-6, interleukin-8) and endothelial dysfunction (angiopoietin-2) than resolving HRF after adjustment. Only half of persistent HRF patients had ARDS, yet exhibited higher mortality and biomarkers than resolving HRF regardless of whether they qualified for ARDS. Conclusion Patients with persistent HRF are common and have higher mortality and elevated circulating markers of lung injury compared to resolving HRF, and yet only a subset are captured by ARDS definitions. Persistent HRF may represent a clinically important, inclusive target for future therapeutic trials in HRF.

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Infants with Moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Neonatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Xingwang Zhu ◽  
Zhichun Feng ◽  
Chengjun Liu ◽  
Liping Shi ◽  
Yuan Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine whether nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) as a primary mode of respiratory support as compared with nasal continuous airway pressure (NCPAP) will reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants (26<sup>0/7</sup>–33<sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestational age [GA]) with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in 18 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. A total of 302 preterm infants born at a GA of 26<sup>0/7</sup>–33<sup>6/7</sup> weeks with a diagnosis of RDS were randomly assigned to either the NCPAP (<i>n</i> = 150) or the NHFOV (<i>n</i> = 152) group. The primary outcome was the need for invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 7 days after birth. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Treatment failure occurred in 15 of 152 infants (9.9%) in the ­NHFOV group and in 26 of 150 infants (17.3%) in the NCPAP group (95% CI of risk difference: −15.2 to 0.4, <i>p =</i> 0.06). In the subgroup analysis, NHFOV resulted in a significantly lower rate of treatment failure than did NCPAP in the strata of 26<sup>+0/7</sup>–29<sup>+6/7</sup>weeks of GA (11.9 vs. 32.4%, 95% CI of risk difference: −39.3 to −1.7, <i>p =</i> 0.03) and birth weight &#x3c;1,500 g (10.4 vs. 29.6%, 95% CI of risk difference: −33.8 to −4.6, <i>p =</i> 0.01). The rate of thick secretions causing an airway obstruction was higher in the NHFOV group than in the NCPAP group (13.8 vs. 5.3%, 95% CI of risk difference: 1.9–15.1, <i>p =</i> 0.01). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were found between the NHFOV and NCPAP groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> NHFOV was not superior to NCPAP with regard to the primary outcome when applied as the primary respiratory support for RDS in infants between 26<sup>+0/7</sup> and 33<sup>+6/7</sup> weeks of GA. In the subgroup analysis, NHFOV seemed to improve effectiveness than NCPAP in preterm infants &#x3c;30 weeks of GA.

scholarly journals COVID-IRS: A novel predictive score for risk of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0248357
Author(s):  
José Antonio Garcia-Gordillo ◽  
Antonio Camiro-Zúñiga ◽  
Mercedes Aguilar-Soto ◽  
Dalia Cuenca ◽  
Arturo Cadena-Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Lactic Dehydrogenase ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Predictive Score ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Predictive Variables

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic disease that can rapidly progress into acute respiratory failure and death. Timely identification of these patients is crucial for a proper administration of health-care resources. Objective To develop a predictive score that estimates the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among patients with COVID-19. Study design Retrospective cohort study of 401 COVID-19 patients diagnosed from March 12, to August 10, 2020. The score development cohort comprised 211 patients (52.62% of total sample) whereas the validation cohort included 190 patients (47.38% of total sample). We divided participants according to the need of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and looked for potential predictive variables. Results We developed two predictive scores, one based on Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the other one on the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), using the following variables: respiratory rate, SpO2/FiO2 ratio and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH). The area under the curve (AUC) in the development cohort was 0.877 (0.823–0.931) using the NLR based score and 0.891 (0.843–0.939) using the IL-6 based score. When compared with other similar scores developed for the prediction of adverse outcomes in COVID-19, the COVID-IRS scores proved to be superior in the prediction of IMV. Conclusion The COVID-IRS scores accurately predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients using readily available variables taken upon admission. More studies testing the applicability of COVID-IRS in other centers and populations, as well as its performance as a triage tool for COVID-19 patients are needed.

scholarly journals Determinants of preterm infants’ deaths at the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the Northeast Countryside in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-544
Author(s):  
Raquel Gomes Lima ◽  
Verônica Cheles Vieira ◽  
Danielle Souto de Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Neonatal Period ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Units ◽  
Early Weaning ◽  
Neonatal Icu

Abstract Objectives: to assess preterm infants’ characteristics, health conditions and neonatal care effect on their death at the neonatal ICU. Methods: this was a non-concurrent cohort study, including preterm infants from three neonatal ICUs from January 1st to December 31st, 2016, followed during the neonatal period and deaths registered during the entire hospitalization. Multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression. Results: of the 181 preterm infants, 18.8% died during hospitalization. Associated with the outcome: a gestational age between 28 and 32 weeks (RR= 5.66; CI95%= 2.08-15.40), and less than 28 weeks (RR=9.24; CI95%=3.27-26.12), Apgar score of 5th minutes less than 7 (RR: 1.82; CI95%=1.08-3.08), use of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 3 days (RR= 4.44; CI95%= 1.66-11.87) and 4 days and more (RR=6.87; CI95%=2.58-18.27). Besides the late sepsis (RR: 3.72, CI95%=1.77-7.83), acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR=2.86, CI95%=1.49-5.46), pulmonary hemorrhage (RR=1.97; CI95%=1.40-2.77), and necrotizing enterocolitis (RR= 3.41; CI95%=1.70-6.83). Conclusions: the results suggest the importance of using strategies to improve care during childbirth, conditions for extremely premature infants, early weaning from a mechanical ventilation and prevention on nosocomial infection.

scholarly journals Síndrome de Dificuldade Respiratória Aguda: Casuística de Dois Anos numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia Taborda ◽  
Filipa Barros ◽  
Vitor Fonseca ◽  
Manuel Irimia ◽  
Ramiro Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
The Mean

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome has a significant incidence and mortality at Intensive Care Units. Therefore, more studies are necessary in order to develop new effective therapeutic strategies. The authors have proposed themselves to characterize Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit for 2 years.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This was an observational retrospective study of the patients filling the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome criteria from the American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, being excluded those non invasively ventilated. Demographic data, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome etiology, comorbidities, Gravity Indices, PaO2/FiO2, ventilator modalities and programmation, pulmonary compliance, days of invasive mechanical ventilation, corticosteroids use, rescue therapies, complications, days at<br />Intensive Care Unit and obits were searched for and were submitted to statistic description and analysis.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A 40 patients sample was obtained, with a median age of 72.5 years (interquartile range = 22) and a female:male ratio of ≈1:1.86. Fifty five percent of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome cases had pulmonary etiology. The mean minimal PaO2/FiO2 was 88mmHg (CI 95%: 78.5–97.6). The mean maximal applied PEEP was 12.4 cmH2O (Standard Deviation 4.12) and the mean maximal used tidal volume was 8.2 mL/ Kg ideal body weight (CI 95%: 7.7–8.6). The median invasive mechanical ventilation days was 10. Forty seven and one half percent of the patients had been administered corticosteroids and 52.5% had been submitted to recruitment maneuvers. The most frequent complication was Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (20%). The median Intensive Care Unit stay was 10.7 days (interquartile range 10.85). The fatality rate was 60%. The probability of the favorable outcome ‘non-death in Intensive Care Unit’ was 4.4x superior for patients who were administered corticosteroids and 11x superior for patients &lt; 65 years old.<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusions:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is associated with long hospitalization and significant mortality. New prospective studies will be necessary to endorse the potential benefit of steroid therapy and to identify the subgroups of patients that warrant its use.

Sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Adam ◽  
Sue Osborne ◽  
John Welch
Keyword(s):  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Blood Purification ◽  
Holistic Care ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Multiple Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Critical Care Team

Sepsis—a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response to infection—occurs at some point in most critical illnesses, and is the most common cause of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Patients with MODS always present great challenges to the critical care team and are often at high risk of death. This chapter discusses the latest thinking about the infective causes and complex evolution of sepsis, with details of how each of the main body systems can be affected (e.g. in the form of acute respiratory distress syndrome) and how different organ functions can be assessed and dysfunction recognized. The priorities, principles, and practicalities of holistic care and management of patients with sepsis and MODS, including adjunct therapies and blood purification, is also described.

Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesut Dursun ◽  
Sinan Uslu ◽  
Ali Bulbul ◽  
Muhittin Celik ◽  
Umut Zubarioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure

Abstract Aims To compare the effect of early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in terms of the need for endotracheal ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants born between 24 and 32 gestational weeks. Methods This is a randomized, controlled, prospective, single-centered study. Forty-two infants were randomized to nIPPV and 42 comparable infants to nCPAP (birth weight 1356 ± 295 and 1359 ± 246 g and gestational age 29.2 ± 1.7 and 29.4 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). Results The need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in the nIPPV group than the nCPAP group (11.9% and 40.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in the duration of total nasal respiratory support, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or other early morbidities. Conclusion nIPPV compared with nCPAP reduced the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in premature infants with RDS.

Outcome of Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure. Insights from the Lung Safe Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 2003317
Author(s):  
Tài Pham ◽  
Antonio Pesenti ◽  
Giacomo Bellani ◽  
Gordon Rubenfeld ◽  
Eddy Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Pulmonary Involvement ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Current Incidence

BackgroundThe current incidence and outcome of patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit are unknown, especially for patients not meeting criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsAn international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of patients presenting with hypoxemia early in the course of mechanical ventilation, conducted during four consecutive weeks in the winter of 2014 in 459 ICUs from 50 countries (LUNG SAFE). Patients were enrolled with PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg, new pulmonary infiltrates and need for mechanical ventilation with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of at least 5 cm H2O. ICU prevalence, causes of hypoxemia, hospital survival, factors associated with hospital mortality were measured. Patients with unilateral versus bilateral opacities were compared.Findings12 906 critically ill patients received mechanical ventilation and 34.9% with hypoxaemia and new infiltrates were enrolled, separated into ARDS (69.0%), unilateral infiltrate (22.7%) and congestive heart failure (8.2%, CHF). The global hospital mortality was 38.6%. CHF patients had a mortality comparable to ARDS (44.1%versus 40.4%). Patients with unilateral-infiltrate had lower unadjusted mortality but similar adjusted mortality than ARDS. The number of quadrants on chest imaging was associated with an increased risk of death. There was no difference in mortality comparing patients with unilateral-infiltrate and ARDS with only 2 quadrants involved.InterpretationMore than one third of the patients receiving mechanical ventilation have hypoxaemia and new infiltrates with an hospital mortality of 38.6%. Survival is dependent on the degree of pulmonary involvement whether or not ARDS criteria are reached.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document