scholarly journals Saccadic reaction time in mirror image sectors across horizontal meridian in eye movement perimetry

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepmala Mazumdar ◽  
Najiya S. Kadavath Meethal ◽  
Ronnie George ◽  
Johan J. M. Pel
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Saccadic Reaction Time ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Standard Automated Perimetry ◽  
Evaluation Phase ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Eye Movement Perimetry

AbstractIn eye movement perimetry (EMP), the saccadic reaction time (SRT) to ‘seen’ visual stimuli are delayed in glaucoma. Evaluating SRT behaviour in hemi-field sectors could refine its clinical implication. The development phase included 60 controls retrospectively and for the test cohort in evaluation phase, another 30 healthy subjects and 30 glaucoma patients were recruited prospectively. The SRTs were used to calculate the normative limits within 5 predefined hemi-field sectors. Scores were assigned to probabilities for SRT at the level of 5%, 2.5% 1% and 0.5%. Per sector pair, a probability score limit (PSL) was calculated at each of the four levels and were compared with the scores obtained from the test cohort. The classification accuracy ‘normal versus abnormal’ was assessed for PSL in EMP and compared with glaucoma hemi-field test in standard automated perimetry. We found no statistically significant differences in SRTs between the mirror sectors in healthy subjects. The PSL at 2.5% had moderate classification accuracy with a specificity of 77% and sensitivity 70%. This could be suggestive of an SRT delay in the overall visual field in glaucoma.

scholarly journals Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepmala Mazumdar ◽  
Najiya S. Kadavath Meethal ◽  
Manish Panday ◽  
Rashima Asokan ◽  
Gijs Thepass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Saccadic Reaction Time ◽  
Effect Of Age ◽  
Eye Movement Perimetry

scholarly journals Impact of Visual Field Testing on Intraocular Pressure Change Trends in Healthy People and Glaucoma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengwei Li ◽  
Bingxin Zheng ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Xinghuai Sun
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Standard Automated Perimetry ◽  
The Impact

Purpose. To compare the impact of visual field (VF) testing on intraocular pressure (IOP) change trends between healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. Methods. We recruited healthy volunteer subjects who did not have previous ocular diseases and open-angle glaucoma patients who were medically controlled well. IOP in both eyes of each participant was measured by using a noncontact tonometer at five time points: before, immediately after (0 minute), and 10, 30, and 60 minutes after the standard automated perimetry. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of VF testing on IOP change trends in healthy and glaucoma eyes. Results. Forty healthy subjects (80 eyes) and 31 open-angle glaucoma patients (62 eyes) were included for the study. The baseline IOP of healthy and glaucoma eyes was 16.11 ± 3.01 mmHg and 15.78 ± 3.57 mmHg, respectively. After the VF testing, the IOP in healthy eyes was decreased by 1.5% at 0 minute, 6.5% at 10 minutes (P<0.001), 6.6% at 30 minutes (P<0.001), and 7.0% at 1 hour (P<0.001), indicating that this reduction was sustained for at least 1 hour. However, the IOP in glaucoma eyes was increased by 12.7% at 0 minute (P<0.001) and, then, returned towards initial values 1 hour after the VF testing. Conclusions. IOP change trends after VF field testing between healthy subjects and glaucoma patients were quite different. VF testing led to a mild and relatively sustained IOP decrease in healthy subjects, whereas IOP in open-angle glaucoma patients tended to significantly increase immediately after VF testing and, then, returned to pretest values after 1 hour. These findings indicate that the factors of VF testing should be considered in the clinical IOP measurements.

scholarly journals Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie George ◽  
Jvan der Steen ◽  
Deepmala Mazumdar ◽  
JJM Pel ◽  
Manish Panday ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Saccadic Reaction Time

scholarly journals The Effect of Cataract on Eye Movement Perimetry

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Thepass ◽  
J. J. M. Pel ◽  
K. A. Vermeer ◽  
O. Creten ◽  
S. R. Bryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Sensitivity Threshold ◽  
Peripheral Stimulus ◽  
Eye Tracker ◽  
Change In Mean ◽  
Cataract Patients ◽  
Eye Movement Perimetry

Purpose. To determine how different grades of cataract affect sensitivity threshold and saccadic reaction time (SRT) in eye movement perimetry (EMP).Methods. In EMP, the visual field is tested by assessing the saccades that a subject makes towards peripheral stimuli using an eye tracker. Forty-eight cataract patients underwent pre- and postoperative EMP examination in both eyes. The subjects had to fix a central stimulus presented on the eye tracker monitor and to look at any detected peripheral stimulus upon its appearance. A multilevel mixed model was used to determine the factors that affected the sensitivity threshold and the SRT as a function of cataract grade.Results. We found no effect of cataract severity (LOCS III grades I through IV) on SRT and the sensitivity thresholds. In cataract of LOCS III grade V, however, we found an increase by 27% and 21% (p<0.001), respectively, compared to the SRT and the sensitivity threshold in LOCS III grade I. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery showed no change in mean SRTs and sensitivity thresholds after surgery in LOCS III grade IV and lower.Conclusion. The present study shows that EMP can be readily used in patients with cataract with LOCS III grade IV and below.

Glaucoma diagnostic performance of humphrey matrix and standard automated perimetry

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 482-485
Author(s):  
Yoon Pyo Nam ◽  
Seong Bae Park ◽  
Sung Yong Kang ◽  
Kyung Rim Sung ◽  
Michael S. Kook
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Standard Automated Perimetry

scholarly journals Association between visual field damage and corneal structural parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandru Lavric ◽  
Valentin Popa ◽  
Hidenori Takahashi ◽  
Rossen M. Hazarbassanov ◽  
Siamak Yousefi
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Standard Automated Perimetry ◽  
Visual Field Damage ◽  
Corneal Shape

AbstractThe main goal of this study is to identify the association between corneal shape, elevation, and thickness parameters and visual field damage using machine learning. A total of 676 eyes from 568 patients from the Jichi Medical University in Japan were included in this study. Corneal topography, pachymetry, and elevation images were obtained using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual field tests were collected using standard automated perimetry with 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. The association between corneal structural parameters and visual field damage was investigated using machine learning and evaluated through tenfold cross-validation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The average mean deviation was − 8.0 dB and the average central corneal thickness (CCT) was 513.1 µm. Using ensemble machine learning bagged trees classifiers, we detected visual field abnormality from corneal parameters with an AUC of 0.83. Using a tree-based machine learning classifier, we detected four visual field severity levels from corneal parameters with an AUC of 0.74. Although CCT and corneal hysteresis have long been accepted as predictors of glaucoma development and future visual field loss, corneal shape and elevation parameters may also predict glaucoma-induced visual functional loss.

scholarly journals Ganglion cell complex scan in the early prediction of glaucoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-241
Author(s):  
S Ganekal
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Cell Complex ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ganglion Cell Complex ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Standard Automated Perimetry ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Color Code ◽  
Rnfl Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To compare the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) with peripapillary retinal fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map in glaucoma suspects and patients. Subjects and methods: Forty participants (20 glaucoma suspects and 20 glaucoma patients) were enrolled. Macular GCC and RNFL thickness maps were performed in both eyes of each participant in the same visit. The sensitivity and specificity of a color code less than 5% (red or yellow) for glaucoma diagnosis were calculated. Standard Automated Perimetry was performed with the Octopus 3.1.1 Dynamic 24-2 program. Statistics: The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 10.1 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, EUA). Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and a p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant. Results: Provide absolute numbers of these findings with their units of measurement. There was a statistically significant difference in average RNFL thickness (p=0.004), superior RNFL thickness (p=0.006), inferior RNFL thickness (p=0.0005) and average GCC (p=0.03) between the suspects and glaucoma patients. There was no difference in optic disc area (p=0.35) and vertical cup/disc ratio (p=0.234) in both groups. While 38% eyes had an abnormal GCC and 13% had an abnormal RNFL thickness in the glaucoma suspect group, 98% had an abnormal GCC and 90% had an abnormal RNFL thickness in the glaucoma group.Conclusion: The ability to diagnose glaucoma with macular GCC thickness is comparable to that with peripapillary RNFL thickness. Macular GCC thickness measurements may be a good alternative or a complementary measurement to RNFL thickness assessment in the clinical evaluation of glaucoma.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v4i2.6538 Nepal J Ophthalmol 2012; 4 (2): 236-241 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document