scholarly journals Visual/anatomical outcome of diabetic macular edema patients lost to follow-up for more than 1 year

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Soo Kim ◽  
Seungheon Lee ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Eoi Jong Seo ◽  
Ju Byung Chae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Anatomical Outcome

AbstractTo investigate the visual/anatomical outcome of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) for more than 1 year during intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. A retrospective review of 182 treatment-naïve DME patients was performed. Among them, we identified patients LTFU for more than 1 year during anti-VEGF treatment. Visual acuity and anatomic outcomes at the first visit, last visit before being LTFU, return visit, and after re-treatment were analyzed and compared with those of DME patients with regular follow-up. Patients who had continuous follow-up visits were assigned to the control group. Sixty patients (33%) with DME were LTFU for more than 1 year during anti-VEGF treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that the ratio of male (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (DM) duration less than 5 years (p = 0.015), and poor early anatomic response (p = 0.012) were higher compared to the control group. Eighteen patients returned to the clinic and received re-treatment. After re-treatment with anti-VEGF, central subfield thickness (CST) was significantly improved to the CST of before LTFU. However, visual acuity did not recover to the level before LTFU (0.63 ± 0.26 vs. 0.45 ± 0.28, p = 0.003). About thirty percent of DME patients were LTFU for more than 1 year. Permanent visual loss was observed in these LTFU patients. Patients with a high risk of LTFU such as male, early DM, and poor response after initial injections should be treated more aggressively to improve the visual outcomes.

scholarly journals Interdigitation and ellipsoid zones disruption correlate with visual outcomes among treatment naive patients with diabetic macular edema

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nardine Sharef ◽  
Rabea Kassem ◽  
Idan Hecht ◽  
Asaf Bar ◽  
Idit Maharshak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Automatic Measurement ◽  
Defect Size ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Snellen Visual Acuity ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: We have recently shown that defects in interdigitation and ellipsoid zones (IZ and EZ) can predict response to anti-VEGF therapy in a small group of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. The aim of the current study is to further evaluate this association in a larger study group of patients over a longer follow-up time. Methods: Thirty eyes of 30 treatment-naïve DME patients were analyzed in this retrospective study. The integrity of foveal IZ and EZ was evaluated using OCT at the diagnosis of DME and following anti-VEGF injections. The defect size was correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: The mean patients' age at baseline was 63.0±10.0 years. Patients underwent 3.9±2.9 anti-VEGF injections for a mean of 9.1±4.8 months. Following treatment, the mean Snellen visual acuity improved from 20/52 to 20/44 (p=0.05), CMT decreased from 432.5±141.4 m to 375.2±121.4 µm (p=0.05) and IZ/EZ defect size decreased from 259.83±375.94 µm to 65.34±143.97 µm (p=0.001). In patients with no IZ/EZ defects at baseline the mean Snellen visual acuity was better when compared to those with IZ/EZ defects (20/36 vs. 20/70, p=0.031). The number of eyes with IZ/EZ defects decreased from 17 (57%) at baseline to 6 (20%) at end of follow-up (p<0.01). BCVA gain correlated with IZ/EZ defect size reduction (r=0.41, p=0.02) but not with improvement in CMT (r=0.28, p=0.121). Conclusions: IZ/EZ defect size correlated not only with baseline BCVA, but also predicted the change in BCVA after anti-VEGF treatment. Possible future automatic measurement of IZ/EZ defect size might prove helpful for evaluation of treatment response.

scholarly journals Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
David Bellocq ◽  
Thibaud Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Baseline Visual Acuity

Objectives of the Study. Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status. Results. Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 50<BVA<60 letters, and BVA>60 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies. Conclusion. Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.

scholarly journals Switch to Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients Unresponsive to Previous Anti-VEGF Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe Mira ◽  
Manuel Paulo ◽  
Filipe Henriques ◽  
João Figueira
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Central Retinal Thickness ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) unresponsive to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Methods. Retrospective review of DME unresponsive to previous anti-VEGF switched to aflibercept with 3 months of follow-up. Changes in best correct visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and frequency of injections were analyzed. The percentage of subjects who had ≥20/40 (logMAR equivalent 0.3) and ≤20/200 (logMAR equivalent 1) was evaluated. Results. A total of 32 eyes from 26 patients were included. Mean age was 65 ± 10 years old. The mean number of previous anti-VEGF injections was 5.34 ± 2.38, and the mean number of aflibercept injections at the end of the study was 2.00 ± 0.00. The CRT at baseline was 501.47 ± 150.51 μm and 367.97 ± 124.61 μm at 3 months of follow-up (P<0.001). The logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.71 ± 0.36 and 0.65 ± 0.33 at the end of the follow-up (P=0.037). At baseline, 12.5% of patients had ≥20/40 compared with 25% at the end of follow-up. At baseline, 28.13% of patients had 20/200 or inferior vision compared with 15.63% at the end of the follow-up. Conclusions. DME patients unresponsive to previous multiple ranibizumab injections demonstrate a significant anatomical and functional improvement with the switch to aflibercept.

Early treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema: Naïve versus refractory patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110248
Author(s):  
Anna V Bux ◽  
Francesca Fortunato ◽  
Antonio Barone ◽  
Vincenzo Russo ◽  
Nicola Delle Noci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
First Line ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naïve to therapy or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, in a single-center, real-world setting. Methods: Patients diagnosed with DME and treated with DEX-I were retrospectively enrolled in the study and split in two groups: naïve (Group 1, n = 64) and refractory (Group 2, n = 64) to treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 month, and every 3 months after each DEX-I implant. Main outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to follow-up visits. Results: Significant improvements in BCVA were observed in treatment-naïve patients at 6 months following the first and second DEX-I injection ( p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0063, respectively), with significant reductions in mean CMT at 6 months after all DEX implants. In treatment-refractory patients, mean CMT was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 months ( p < 0.05) after all DEX-I injections, although no changes were observed in BCVA. Conclusions: DEX-I improved visual acuity and macular edema mostly in treatment-naïve patients, suggesting DEX-I may be a viable first-line treatment option in DME.

scholarly journals Első tapasztalataink diabeteses maculopathia Navilas® 577s mikropulzuslézer-készülékkel történő kezelésével

2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (49) ◽  
pp. 2078-2085
Author(s):  
Mónika Ecsedy ◽  
Illés Kovács ◽  
Róbert Gergely ◽  
Katalin Gombos ◽  
Judit Meisel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Fundus Photography ◽  
Thickness Change ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Number Of Injections

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés és célkitűzés: A Navilas® 577s mikropulzuslézerrel végzett kezelés biztonságosságának és hatásosságának vizsgálata diabeteses maculaoedemában. Módszer: Retrospektív vizsgálatunkba diabeteses maculaoedema miatt gondozott és legalább 6 hónapos utánkövetéssel rendelkező, korábban Navilas® 577s mikropulzuslézer-kezelésen átesett 28 beteg 46 szemét válogattuk be. Minden szemen optikaikoherencia-tomográfia (OCT) vastagsági térkép navigált, nonkontakt, küszöb alatti mikropulzuslézer-kezelés történt egy alkalommal. A kezelést megelőzően és az azt követő 6. hónapban rögzítettük a látóélesség, a centrális retinavastagság értékeit és az éreredetű endothelialis növekedési faktort (VEGF) gátló injekciók számát. A követési idő végén megvizsgáltuk a szemfenéki képnek a digitális fundusfotográfia és az átmetszeti OCT-képek segítségével észlelhető változásait. Eredmények: A vizsgált szemek közül 30 esetben a lézerkezelést korábbi centrális maculaoedema miatt VEGF-gátló injekciós kezelés előzte meg, míg 16 szem esetében primer lézerkezelés történt. A Navilas® 577s mikropulzuslézer-kezelést követően 6 hónappal sem a látóélesség, sem a centrális maculavastagság nem változott szignifikánsan egyik csoportban sem (p>0,05). Ugyanakkor a korábban injekciós kezelésben részesült szemek esetében a lézerkezelést megelőző 6 hónapban adott injekciók száma az átlagos 2,63 ± 1,18 értékről átlagosan 0,5 ± 0,73 értékre csökkent (p<0,001). A fundusfotókon és az átmetszeti OCT-scaneken a lézerkezelést követően egyetlen szem esetében sem találtunk látható pigmentelváltozásokat vagy hegesedést. Következetetés: Megfigyeléseink szerint a Navilas® 577s mikropulzuslézer-kezelés biztonságos a diabeteses maculaoedemás betegek kezelésében, továbbá a VEGF-gátlóval kezelt szemeken szerepet játszhat az injekciók számának csökkentésében. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(49): 2078–2085. Summary. Introduction and objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of Navilas® 577s micropulse subthreshold laser in the treatment of non-center involved diabetic macular edema. Method: In this retrospective study, we included 46 eyes of 28 patients with diabetic macular edema, who were treated at least 6 months ago with Navilas® 577s micropulse laser. Laser treatment was navigated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular thickness map in subthreshold micropulse mode at one occasion. Data from visual acuity testing, retinal thickness, and the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections needed 6 months before and after treatment were registered. At the end of the follow-up, digital fundus photography and OCT radial scans were performed to evaluate any possible anatomical changes. Results: 30 eyes had previous anti-VEGF treatment for central macular edema, and in 16 eyes we performed the laser as primary treatment. At the end of the follow-up, no significant visual acuity or central retinal thickness change were observed (p>0.05). On the other hand, in the anti-VEGF pretreated group the number of injections decreased significantly from 2.63 ± 1.18 to 0.5 ± 0.73 (p<0.001). We did not find any pigmentary changes or visible signs of scaring on final fundus photography pictures or OCT radial scans. Conclusion: Navilas® 577s subthreshold microsecond laser proved to be a safe option in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. It can be very useful in anti-VEGF treated eyes by decreasing the number of injections needed. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(49): 2078–2085.

scholarly journals Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Young Hwan Bae ◽  
Seong Mi Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
So Hyun Bae ◽  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose. To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods. This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis. Results. During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR ( P = 0.042 ). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm ( P = 0.887 ). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections ( P < 0.001 ). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P = 0.048 ). Conclusions. In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elad Moisseiev ◽  
Sam Abbassi ◽  
Sumeer Thinda ◽  
Joseph Yoon ◽  
Glenn Yiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p<0.001 for both). No complications related to the micropulse laser were encountered. Conclusions: Micropulse laser is a safe and effective treatment for DME, which may achieve comparable improvement in VA along with a significant reduction in the burden of anti-VEGF injections. We suggest a treatment approach for its inclusion in the early stages of DME.

scholarly journals Subthreshold micropulse laser adjuvant to bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in treating diabetic macular edema: one- year- follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142110408
Author(s):  
Leila El Matri ◽  
Ahmed Chebil ◽  
Khaled El Matri ◽  
Yousra Falfoul ◽  
Zouheir Chebbi
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Purpose: To compare the therapeutic impact of combining intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) with micropulse laser (MPL) in central diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) versus IVB monotherapy during 12 months follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study of 98 treatment-naive eyes (63 patients) with central diffuse DME. The first group of patients (IVB + MPL group, n = 49) was treated with 3 monthly IVB followed by MPL within 1 week after the third injection. Patients were then followed and treated on a pro re nata (PRN) basis, with MPL retreatment if necessary. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), number of IVB injections and MPL sessions were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 months. A control group of diabetic patients with treatment-naive DME was treated with standard protocol of 3 monthly IVB as monotherapy then followed on a PRN basis (IVB group, n = 49). Statistic comparaison of BCVA, CMT, and IVB number variation was interpreted at 12 months between both groups. Results: In IVB + MPL group, baseline BCVA improvement was not significant at 4 and 8 months ( p = 0.90, p = 0.08), and was statistically significant ( p = 0.01) at 12 months. Mean CMT significantly decreased at 4, 8, and 12 months ( p < 0.01) in IVB + MPL group. The difference in BCVA (p = 0.091) and CMT (p = 0.082) variation at 12 months between both groups was not significant but the number of injections was significantly lower in IVB + MPL group (4.1 ± 1.5 injections) compared to IVB group (7.2 ± 1.3 injections) ( p < 0.005). Conclusion: Combining intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and MPL in the treatment of DME is effective and safe. This protocol may decrease the number of IVB and its frequency. It offers the advantage of lasting therapeutic response with fewer recurrences.

Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Multiple Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants: Evidence from Real-Life Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 243 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele De Geronimo ◽  
Paola Giorno ◽  
Fabio Scarinci ◽  
Antonluca Boninfante ◽  
Monica Varano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Positive Balance

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To gain information about multiple dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I) injections in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in real-life clinical settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with DME treated with multiple (≥5) DEX-I injections between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were retrospectively enrolled regardless of previous treatment with anti-VEGF agents. All patients were evaluated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR, ocular fundus, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at baseline and at 3 months after the last DEX-I injection. Multiple DEX-I injections were administered when necessary in case of DME recurrence. Main efficacy measures were changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to 3 months after the last DEX-I injection; main secondary measures were an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), the need for cataract surgery, endophthalmitis, and vitreous hemorrhage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seventeen patients (18 eyes) with DME and mean age (± SD) of 54.3 ± 8.16 years were treated with DEX-I injections between 2014 and 2018. The majority of eyes (77.8%) had been treated with a mean of 6.3 ± 3.2 anti-VEGF agents before switching to DEX-I. During a mean follow-up period of 37.6 months and after a mean number of 5.9 DEX-I injections, visual acuity improved or stabilized in 77.8% of all eyes, accompanied by a significant reduction in CRT. An increase in IOP was recorded in 38.8% of all patients, while a surgical procedure was needed for cataract in 73.3% of all phakic patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this real-life experience in Italy, multiple DEX-I treatments showed good efficacy with no new safety concerns. The follow-up duration of &#x3e;3 years and a greater number of DEX-I intravitreal injections compared to other observations confirm the positive balance between risks and benefits of DEX-I in the long term.

Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Haider ◽  
Uzma Sattar ◽  
Syeda Rushda Zaidi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.Study Design: Quasi experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from January 2019 to June 2019.Material and Methods: 70 eyes with diabetic macular edema were included in the study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Central macular edema was measured in μm on OCT and visual acuity was documentedusing Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitrealBevacizumab. Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA beforeand after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MARchart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±14 to 283 ± 10.6 μm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.Conclusion: A 45 μm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvementin visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document