Die intramuskuläre Injektion in der Notfallmedizin

Der Notarzt ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 361-368
Author(s):  
Tobias Küßner ◽  
Manuel Obermaier ◽  
Erik Popp

ZusammenfassungAuch wenn die intramuskuläre Injektion in der Notfallmedizin eher eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt, stellt sie doch einen effektiven, sicheren und schnellen Applikationsweg zur Verabreichung bestimmter Notfallmedikamente dar. So findet sie sich in verschiedenen Leitlinien als First-Line-Zugangsweg, so z. B. bei der Anaphylaxie und dem Status epilepticus. Auch bei aggressiven bzw. agitierten Patienten und Kindern bestehen gute Erfahrungen hinsichtlich der intramuskulären Verabreichung (analgo-)sedierender Medikamente. In Notfallsituationen gut zugängliche Applikationsorte sind der laterale Oberschenkel, die Wade und die Schulter. Bei sorgfältiger und antiseptischer Vorgehensweise sowie korrekter Wahl von Punktionsort und Nadellänge sind Komplikationen selten.

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eljim P. Tesoro ◽  
Gretchen M. Brophy

Seizures are serious complications seen in critically ill patients and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if the cause is not identified and treated quickly. Uncontrolled seizures can lead to status epilepticus (SE), which is considered a medical emergency. The first-line treatment of seizures is an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine followed by anticonvulsant therapy. Refractory SE can evolve into a nonconvulsive state requiring IV anesthetics or induction of pharmacological coma. To prevent seizures and further complications in critically ill patients with acute neurological disease or injury, short-term seizure prophylaxis should be considered in certain patients.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S1-S56 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Wheless ◽  
Dave F. Clarke ◽  
Daniel Carpenter

Background. Childhood epilepsies are a heterogeneous group of conditions that differ in diagnostic criteria and management and have dramatically different outcomes. Despite increasing data on treatment of epilepsy, research findings on childhood epilepsy are more limited and many clinical questions remain unanswered, so that clinicians must often rely on clinical judgment. In such clinical situations, expert opinion can be especially helpful. Methods. A survey on pediatric epilepsy and seizures (33 questions and 645 treatment options) was sent to 41 U.S. physicians specializing in pediatric epilepsy, 39 (95%) of whom completed it. In some questions, the experts were asked to recommend overall treatment approaches for specific syndromes (the order in which they would use certain strategies). Most of the questions asked the experts to rate options using a modified version of the RAND 9-point scale for medical appropriateness. Consensus was defined as a non-random distribution of scores by chisquare test, with ratings used to assign a categorical rank (first line/usually appropriate, second line/equivocal, and third line/usually not appropriate) to each option. Results. Valproate was treatment of choice for symptomatic myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures except in the very young, with lamotrigine and topiramate also first line (usually appropriate). Zonisamide was first line only if the child also has myoclonic seizures. For initial monotherapy for complex partial seizures, oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine were treatments of choice, with lamotrigine and levetiracetam also first line. As initial therapy for infantile spasms caused by tuberous sclerosis, viagabatrin was treatment of choice, with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) also first line. As initial therapy for infantile spasms that are symptomatic in etiology, ACTH was treatment of choice, with topiramate also first line As initial therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, valproate was treatment of choice, with topiramate and lamotrigine also first line. For acute treatment of a prolonged febrile seizure or cluster of seizures, rectal diazepam was treatment of choice. For benign childhood epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes, oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine were treatments of choice, with gabapentin, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam also first line. For childhood absence epilepsy, ethosuximide was treatment of choice, with valproate and lamotrigine also first line. For juvenile absence epilepsy, valproate and lamotrigine were treatments of choice. For juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in adolescent males, valproate and lamotrigine were treatments of choice, with topiramate also first line; for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in adolescent females, lamotrigine was treatment of choice, with topiramate and valproate other first-line options. As initial therapy for neonatal status epilepticus, intravenous phenobarbital was treatment of choice, with intravenous lorazepam or fosphenytoin also first line. As initial therapy for all types of pediatric status epilepticus, lorazepam was treatment of choice, with intravenous diazepam also first line. For generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus, rectal diazepam and fosphenytoin were also first line; for complex partial status epilepticus, fosphenytoin was also first line; and for absence status epilepticus, intravenous valproate was also first line. Conclusion. The expert panel reached consensus on many treatment options. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the understanding that new research data may take precedence, the experts' recommendations provide helpful guidance in situations where the medical literature is scant or lacking. The information in this report should be evaluated in conjunction with evidence-based findings. (J Child Neurol 2005;20:Sl-S56)


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (06) ◽  
pp. 661-674
Author(s):  
Cristina Barcia Aguilar ◽  
Iván Sánchez Fernández ◽  
Tobias Loddenkemper

AbstractStatus epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideto Yoshikawa ◽  
Sawako Yamazaki ◽  
Tokinari Abe ◽  
Yoshihiko Oda

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012292
Author(s):  
Pia De Stefano ◽  
Sira Maria Baumann ◽  
Saskia Semmlack ◽  
Stephan Rüegg ◽  
Stephan Marsch ◽  
...  

Objective:To explore safety and efficacy of artificial coma induction to treat status epilepticus (SE) immediately after first-line antiseizure treatment instead of following the recommended approach of first using second-line drugs.Methods:Clinical and electrophysiologic data of all adult patients treated for SE from 2017 to 2018 in the Swiss academic medical care centers from Basel and Geneva were retrospectively assessed. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were the emergence of complications during SE, duration of SE, ICU and hospital stay.Results:Of 230 patients, 205 received treatment escalation after first-line medication. Of those, 27.3% were directly treated with artificial coma and 72.7% with second-line non-anesthetic antiseizure drugs. Of the latter, 16.6% were subsequently put on artificial coma after failure of second-line treatment. Multivariable analyses revealed increasing odds for coma induction after first-line treatment with younger age, the presence of convulsions, and with an increased SE severity as quantified by the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS). While outcomes and complications did not differ compared to patients with treatment escalation according to the guidelines, coma induction after first-line treatment was associated with shorter SE duration, ICU and hospital stay.Conclusions:Early induction of artificial coma is performed in more than every fourth patient and especially in younger patients presenting with convulsions and more severe SE. Our data demonstrate that this aggressive treatment escalation was not associated with an increase in complications but with shorter duration of SE, ICU and hospital stays.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class III evidence that early induction of artificial coma after unsuccessful first-line treatment for SE is associated with shorter duration of SE, ICU and hospital stays compared to the use of a second-line non-anesthetic antiseizure drug instead or prior to anesthetics, without an associated increase in complications.


Author(s):  
Jason L. Sanders ◽  
Jarone Lee

Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a life-threatening emergency, and multiple agents have been advocated for the initial treatment. The VA Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group conducted a randomized, blinded trial comparing intravenous diazepam followed by phenytoin, lorazepam, phenobarbital, or phenytoin as first-line treatment for GCSE. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant difference in treatment was observed across all groups for patients with either overt GCSE or subtle GCSE. Among patients with verified-diagnosis overt GCSE, lorazepam was most successful at achieving cessation of seizures, though no difference was observed among patients with verified-diagnosis subtle GCSE. Results from this trial and two others establish benzodiazepines as the favored first line treatment of GCSE. Investigations are ongoing comparing benzodiazepines to newer antiepileptic drugs. The Established Status Epilepticus Trial will be the first randomized trial comparing fosphenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproic acid for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in children and adults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Charalambous ◽  
Holger A. Volk ◽  
Luc Van Ham ◽  
Sofie F. M. Bhatti

AbstractStatus epilepticus (SE) or prolonged epileptic seizure activity is a common neurological emergency with a high mortality rate and, if left untreated, can lead to irreversible cerebral damage and systemic complications. Fast and effective first-line management is of paramount importance, particularly in the at-home management of seizures where drug administration routes are limited. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) have been exclusively used in veterinary medicine for decades as first-line drugs based on their high potency and rapid onset of action. Various administration routes exist in dogs, such as oral, intravenous, intramuscular, rectal, and intranasal, all with different advantages and limitations. Recently, intranasal drug delivery has become more popular due to its unique and favourable characteristics, providing potential advantages over other routes of drug administration in the management of canine SE. This narrative review provides an outline of the management of SE at home and in a hospital setting, discusses considerations and challenges of the various routes of BZD administration, and evaluates the impact of intranasal drug administration (nose-brain pathway) for controlling canine SE at home and within hospital settings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Lapenta ◽  
Alessandra Morano ◽  
Sara Casciato ◽  
Martina Fanella ◽  
Jinane Fattouch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document