scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (11) ◽  
pp. E1664-E1672
Author(s):  
Saurabh Chandan ◽  
Babu P. Mohan ◽  
Shahab R. Khan ◽  
Lena L. Kassab ◽  
Suresh Ponnada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Drainage

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a minimal-invasive therapeutic option to surgery and in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The aim of this review was to quantitatively appraise the clinical outcomes of EUS-PDD by meta-analysis methods. Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through March 2020 to identify studies that reported on EUS-PDD. Pooled rates of technical success, successful drainage of pancreatic duct, clinical success, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I2% and 95 % prediction interval. Results A total of 22 studies (714 patients) were included. The pooled rate of technical success in EUS-PDD was 84.8 % (95 % CI 79.1–89.2). The pooled rate of successful PD drained by EUS-PDD was 77.5 % (95 % CI 63.1–87.4). The pooled rate of clinical success of EUS-PDD was 89.2 % (95 % CI 82.1–93.7). The pooled rate of all adverse events was 18.1 % (95 % CI 14.2–22.9). On sub-group analysis, the pooled technical success and clinical success of EUS-PDD from Japanese data were considerably superior (91.2 %, 83–95.6 & 92.5 %, 83.9–96.7, respectively). The pooled rate of post EUS-PDD acute pancreatitis was 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.5–9.4), bleeding was 4.1 % (95 % CI 2.7–6.2), perforation and/or pneumoperitoneum was 3.1 % (95 % CI 1.9–5), pancreatic leak and/or pancreatic fluid collection was 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.4–4), and infection was 2.8 % (95 % CI 1.7–4.6). Conclusion EUS-PDD demonstrates high technical success and clinical success rates with acceptable adverse events. Technical success was especially high for anastomotic strictures.

Efficacy and safety of lumen apposing metal stents or self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledocho-duodenostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo Amato ◽  
Emanuele Sinagra ◽  
Ciro Celsa ◽  
Marco Enea ◽  
Andrea Buda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Post Procedure

BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is becoming an option for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) are replacing self-expandable metal stents (SEMS). Aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAMS or SEMS for EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy. METHODS A meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA protocols. Electronic databases were searched for studies on EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy. The primary outcome was the clinical success. Technical success, re-intervention and adverse events were secondary outcomes. We used the random effects model with the DerSimonian-Laird estimation and the results were depicted using the forest plots. Furthermore, we performed analysis of the outcomes with the data stratified by selected variables. RESULTS Overall, 31 studies (820 patients) were included. The pooled rates of clinical and technical success were 93.6% (95% CI [95%CI] 88.6-96.5%) and 94.8% (95%CI 90.2-97.3%), for LAMS , and 91.7% (95%CI 88.1-94.2) and 92.7 % (95%CI 89.9-94.9%) for SEMS, respectively. The pooled rates of adverse events were 17.1% (95%CI 12.5-22.8%) for LAMS compared to 18.3% (95% CI 14.3-23.0%) for SEMS. The pooled rates of re-intervention were 10.9% (95% CI 7.7-15.3%) for LAMS compared to 13.9% (95% CI 9.6-19.7%) for SEMS. Subgroup analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that LAMS and SEMS are comparable in terms of efficacy for EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy. The use of LAMS was associated with similar clinical and technical success, post-procedure adverse events and re-intervention rate when compared with SEMS placement. These last two points require further investigation.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural approach versus ERCP-guided transpapillary approach for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 950-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirles Bishay ◽  
Devon Boyne ◽  
Mohammad Yaghoobi ◽  
Mouen A. Khashab ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Malignant Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Primary decompression in patients with malignant biliary obstruction can be achieved via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary stenting, or, more recently, via transmural endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). It is unclear whether either approach is superior in terms of clinical success or adverse events in the primary setting. Methods A comprehensive systematic electronic search was performed for studies comparing EUS-BD and ERCP as the primary approach with respect to clinical success and any other outcome(s). Pooled relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences were obtained as appropriate using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results 5 out of 776 studies with a total of 396 patients were included. Overall clinical success was not significantly different between EUS-BD and ERCP (RR 0.98, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.03). There was no significant difference in overall adverse events (RR 0.84, 95 %CI 0.35 to 2.01), though results suggested that EUS-BD may be associated with a reduced risk of pancreatitis (RR 0.22, 95 %CI 0.05 to 1.02). There were no significant differences between EUS-BD and ERCP in terms of procedure time or the risk of stent occlusion. Conclusions EUS-BD had similar clinical success rates and occlusion rates to ERCP in the primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction from meta-analysis including a modest number of patients. EUS-BD may be a practical alternative to the ERCP-guided approach in such patients, but further well-designed prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are required to more clearly delineate potential differences in adverse events and cost.

scholarly journals Comparative outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound–guided cystogastrostomy for peripancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 263177451984340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Renelus ◽  
Daniel S. Jamorabo ◽  
Hashroop K. Gurm ◽  
Niel Dave ◽  
William M. Briggs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Pancreatic Pseudocysts ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Fluid Collections

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided cystogastrostomy has become the first-line treatment for symptomatic peripancreatic fluid collections. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of cystogastrostomy via a meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Medline databases for studies published from January 2005 to May 2018. We included randomized controlled trials along with retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting endoscopic ultrasound–guided cystogastrostomy stent placement for peripancreatic fluid collections. The primary outcome for our meta-analysis was complete peripancreatic fluid collection resolution on imaging. Our secondary outcomes included comparative efficacy and safety of the procedure for pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis using metal and plastic stents. Results: Seventeen articles involving 1708 patients met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Based upon the random effects model, the pooled technical success rate of cystogastrostomy was 88% (95% confidence interval = 83–92 with I2 = 85%). There was no difference in the technical success rate between pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (91% and 86%, respectively p = nonsignificant). The adverse event rates for metal and plastic stents were equivalent (14% and 18%, respectively, p = nonsignificant). Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided cystogastrostomy stents are effective in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. We found no difference in technical success or adverse event rates of drainage based on peripancreatic fluid collection type or stent used.

scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (08) ◽  
pp. 722-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Wai-Yin Luk ◽  
Shayan Irani ◽  
Rajesh Krishnamoorthi ◽  
James Yun Wong Lau ◽  
Enders Kwok Wai Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
Hospital Stays

Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an effective and safe alternative to percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these two procedures in high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted for all articles published up to October 2017 to identify comparative studies between EUS-GBD and PT-GBD. A meta-analysis was performed on outcomes including technical success, clinical success, post-procedure adverse events, length of hospital stay, unplanned hospital readmission, need for reintervention, recurrent cholecystitis, and disease- or treatment-related mortality for these two procedures. Results Five comparative studies (206 patients in the EUS-GBD group vs. 289 patients in the PT-GBD group), were included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in technical success (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.12 to 1.58; P  = 0.21; I 2 = 0 %) and clinical success (OR 1.07, 95 %CI 0.36 to 3.16; P  = 0.90; I 2 = 44 %) between the two procedures. EUS-GBD had fewer adverse events than PT-GBD (OR 0.43, 95 %CI 0.18 to 1.00; P  = 0.05; I 2 = 66 %). Moreover, patients undergoing EUS-GBD had shorter hospital stays, with pooled standard mean difference of – 2.53 (95 %CI – 4.28 to – 0.78; P = 0.005; I 2 = 98 %), and required significantly fewer reinterventions (OR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.04 to 0.042; P <  0.001; I 2 = 32 %) resulting in significantly fewer unplanned readmissions (OR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.05 to 0.53; P  = 0.003; I 2 = 79 %). Conclusions EUS-GBD was associated with lower rates of post-procedure adverse events, shorter hospital stays, and fewer reinterventions and readmissions compared with PT-GBD in patients with acute cholecystitis who were unfit for surgery.

scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 483-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Sportes ◽  
Marine Camus ◽  
Michel Greget ◽  
Sarah Leblanc ◽  
Romain Coriat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
The Eu

Background: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is widely performed as a salvage procedure in patients with unresectable malignant obstruction of the common bile duct (CBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or in case of surgically altered anatomy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EU-HGS) is a more recently introduced alternative to relieve malignant obstructive jaundice. The aim of this prospective observational study was to compare the outcome, efficacy and adverse events of EU-HGS and PTBD. Methods: From April 2012 to August 2015, consecutive patients with malignant CBD obstruction who underwent EU-HGS or PTBD in two tertiary-care referral centers were included. The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate. Secondary endpoints were technical success, overall survival, procedure-related adverse events, incidence of adverse events, and reintervention rate. Results: A total of 51 patients (EU-HGS, n = 31; PTBD, n = 20) were included. Median survival was 71 days (range 25–75th percentile; 30–95) for the EU-HGS group and 78 days (range 25–75th percentile; 42–108) for the PTBD group ( p = 0.99). Technical success was achieved in all patients in both groups. Clinical success was achieved in 25 (86%) of 31 patients in the EU-HGS group and in 15 (83%) of 20 patients in the PTBD group ( p = 0.88). There was no difference in adverse events rates between the two groups (EU-HGS: 16%; PTBD: 10%) ( p = 0.69). Four deaths within 1 month (two hemorrhagic and two septic) were considered procedure related (two in the EU-HGS group and two in the PTBD group). Overall reintervention rate was significantly lower after EU-HGS ( n = 2) than after PTBD ( n = 21) ( p = 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter after EU-HGS (8 days versus 15 days; p = 0.002). Conclusions: EU-HGS can be an effective and safe mini invasive-procedure alternative to PTBD, with similar success and adverse-event rates, but with lower rates of reintervention and length of hospitalization.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided entero-enterostomy for the treatment of afferent loop syndrome: a multicenter experience

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (09) ◽  
pp. 891-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaya Brewer Gutierrez ◽  
Shayan Irani ◽  
Saowanee Ngamruengphong ◽  
Hanaa Aridi ◽  
Rastislav Kunda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Afferent Loop ◽  
Afferent Loop Syndrome

Abstract Background Afferent loop syndrome (ALS) is traditionally managed surgically and, more recently, endoscopically. The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided entero-enterostomy (EUS-EE) has not been well described. The aim of this study was to assess the technical and clinical success and safety of EUS-EE. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective series at six centers in patients with ALS treated by EUS-EE. Data on patients treated with enteroscopy-assisted luminal stenting (EALS) at a single center were also collected. Results 18 patients (mean age 64.2 years, 72 % post-pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 female) underwent EUS-EE. The most common symptoms were vomiting (27.8 %) and jaundice (33.3 %). Clinical success included resolution of symptoms in 88.9 % and improvement to allow hospital discharge in 11.1 %. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases, with a mean procedure time of 29.7 minutes. The most common procedure was a gastro-jejunostomy (72.2 %). Three adverse events (16.7 %) occurred (two mild, one moderate). When compared with data on EALS, patients treated with EUS-EE needed fewer re-interventions (16.6 % vs. 76.5 %; P < 0.001). Conclusion EUS-EE seems to be safe and effective in the treatment of ALS. Indirect comparison with EALS suggested that EUS-EE is associated with a reduced need for re-intervention.

scholarly journals Patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (09) ◽  
pp. E1194-E1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine B. Kastelijn ◽  
Leon M.G. Moons ◽  
Francisco J. Garcia-Alonso ◽  
Manuel Pérez-Miranda ◽  
Viliam Masaryk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel, minimally invasive technique in the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Several studies have demonstrated feasibility and safety of EUS-GE, but evidence on long-term durability is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate patency of EUS-GE in treatment of malignant GOO. Patients and Methods An international multicenter study was performed in seven centers in four European countries. Patients who underwent EUS-GE with a LAMS between March 2015 and March 2019 for palliative treatment of symptomatic malignant GOO were included retrospectively. Our main outcome was recurrent obstruction due to LAMS dysfunction; other outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and survival. Results A total of 45 patients (mean age 69.9 ± 12.3 years and 48.9 % male) were included. Median duration of follow-up was 59 days (interquartile range [IQR] 41–128). Recurrent obstruction occurred in two patients (6.1 %), after 33 and 283 days of follow-up. Technical success was achieved in 39 patients (86.7 %). Clinical success was achieved in 33 patients (73.3 %). AEs occurred in 12 patients (26.7 %), of which five were fatal. Median overall survival was 57 days (IQR 32–114). Conclusions EUS-GE showed a low rate of recurrent obstruction. The relatively high number of fatal AEs underscores the importance of careful implementation of EUS-GE in clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document