Langzeiteffekte von MT versus OP bei Karpaltunnelsyndrom

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Arne Vielitz

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Arias-Burai JL, Cleland JA et al. Manual Therapy Versus Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: 4-Year Follow-Up from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther 2020; 100: 1987–1996. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa150

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. J. Cho ◽  
J. H. Lee ◽  
D. J. Shin ◽  
K. H. Park

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare outcomes of limited open and short wrist transverse techniques in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. In a single centre randomized controlled trial, 84 patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized before surgery to limited open or short wrist transverse open carpal tunnel release. The patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery. At every follow-up, the Brigham and Women’s Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores, scar discomfort, and subjective patient satisfaction were evaluated. Two years after surgery, five patients were lost to follow-up. The groups had similar Brigham and Women’s Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity and Functional Status scores and subjective satisfaction scores. The incidence of scar discomfort was not significantly different between the two groups on serial postoperative follow-up. Short wrist transverse open release surgery showed similar early postoperative symptoms and subjective and functional outcomes to limited open release. Level of evidence: II


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad Zarrin ◽  
maryam saadat ◽  
Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh ◽  
Davood Shalil Ahmadi

Abstract BackgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. A recent systematic review described limited or no evidence about the conservative interventions. Literature has expressed that more proximal area such as the cervical spine is involved in CTS. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the effects of combination cervical manual therapy and conventional physical therapy on pain, self-reported function, and electrophysiological findings in the management these patients.MethodsThis study will be a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) in which carpal tunnel syndrome subjects randomize to either conventional or combined exercise groups. The conventional group take routine physical therapy treatments, while patients in combine exercise group receive cervical manual therapy plus routine physical therapy treatments. All patients receive 10 sessions of supervised intervention. The outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), Boston Carpal Tunnel and DASH questionnaire, motor distal latencies and sensory nerve conduction velocity of median nerve. They obtain pre- and post-intervention. DiscussionThe findings of this study will provide knowledge about the comparison effectiveness of conventional physical therapy with and without cervical manual therapy on symptom severity, functional status, disability, velocity and latency median nerve in patients with CTS.Trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20201201049565N1. Registered on 15 December 2020.


Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133S-133S
Author(s):  
Leyla Eraslan ◽  
Gul Baltaci ◽  
Deniz Yuce ◽  
Arzu Erbilici

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Vincent Chi Ho Chung ◽  
Robin Sze Tak Ho ◽  
Siya Liu ◽  
Marc Ka Chun Chong ◽  
Benjamin Hon Kei Yip ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document