New surgical minimally invasive lead explantation due to infective endocarditis with large lead vegetations is superior to conventional approach via median sternotomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Ziegelhoeffer ◽  
M Schoenburg ◽  
G Goebel ◽  
Z Szalay ◽  
T Walther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Conventional Approach

Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Replacement with Valved Conduits through Partial Upper Sternotomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (04) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mosab Alshakaki ◽  
Sven Martens ◽  
Mirela Scherer ◽  
Julia Hillebrand
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Aortic Root ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Aortic Root Replacement ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Surgical Access ◽  
Secondary Bleeding ◽  
Minimally Invasive Access

Background Minimally invasive surgical access through limited sternotomy reduces trauma and morbidity in cardiosurgical patients. However, until now, it is not the standard access for aortic root replacement. This study details our clinic's experience with minimally invasive implantation of valved conduits through partial upper sternotomy and the comparison to conventional full median sternotomy. Methods Between January 2012 and March 2016, a total of 187 patients underwent aortic root replacement with valved conduits in our department. Minimally invasive access through partial upper sternotomy (group A) was performed in 33 patients (9 female, 24 male; mean age: 55.68 ± 13.24 years). Four of these patients received concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve interventions. The results were compared with similar procedures through conventional approach (group B): 25 patients (7 female, 18 male; mean age: 59.09 ± 12.32 years). Results In all 33 cases of minimally invasive access and 25 cases of conventional approach, aortic root replacement was successful. Operative times were as follows (in minutes; groups A and B)—cardiopulmonary bypass: 166.12 ± 40.61 and 162.88 ± 45.89; cross-clamp time: 122.24 ± 27.42 and 113.44 ± 22.57, respectively. In both groups, two patients needed postoperative reexploration due to secondary bleeding. One multimorbid patient suffered from postoperative stroke and died on the ninth postoperative day due to heart failure. The observed operation times and clinical results after minimally invasive surgery are comparable to conduit implantation through full median sternotomy. Conclusions Partial upper sternotomy is a feasible access for safe aortic root replacement with valved conduits. Nevertheless, minimally invasive aortic root replacement is a challenging operative procedure.

scholarly journals Early and long-term results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy approach: a retrospective propensity-score matched analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabreen Mkalaluh ◽  
Marcin Szczechowicz ◽  
Bashar Dib ◽  
Anton Sabashnikov ◽  
Gabor Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Mitral Valve Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Valve Regurgitation ◽  
Term Survival

Background Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MVS) via right mini-thoracotomy has recently attracted a lot of attention. Minimally invasive MVS shows postoperative results that are comparable to those of conventional MVS through the median sternotomy as per various earlier studies. Methods Between 2000 and 2016, a total of 669 isolated mitral valve procedures for isolated mitral valve regurgitation were performed. A propensity score-matched analysis was generated for the elimination of the differences in relevant preoperative risk factors between the cohorts and included 227 patient pairs. Only degenerative mitral valve regurgitation was included. The aim of our study was to examine if the minimally MVS is superior to the conventional approach through sternotomy based on a retrospective propensity-matched analysis. The primary endpoints were early mortality and long-term survival. The secondary endpoints included postoperative complications. Results The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher within the conventional sternotomy cohort (3.1%, n = 7 vs 0.4%, n = 1 for the minimally invasive cohort; p = 0.032). The incidence of stroke and exploration for bleeding was comparable. In contrast, the necessity for dialysis was significantly lower in the minimally invasive cohort (p = 0.044). Postoperative pain was not significantly lower in the minimally invasive MVS cohort (p = 0.862). While patients who underwent minimally invasive MVS experienced longer bypass and cross-clamp times, their lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital, did not differ from the conventionally operated collective (p = 0.779 and p = 0.516), respectively. The mitral valve repair rate of 81.1% in the minimally invasive cohort was significantly superior to that of the conventional approach, which was 46.3% (p < 0.0001). The one-, five-, and 10-year survival rates were significantly higher in the minimally invasive cohort compared to the conventional approach (96%, 90%, and 84% vs. 89%, 85%, and 70%; log rank p = 0.004). Conclusion Despite prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times, the minimally invasive MVS may be considered a safe approach that is equivalent to standard median sternotomy with lower early mortality and superior long-term survival.

Surgical Technique: Papillary Muscle Sling for Functional Mitral Regurgitation during Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. E295-E297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Lamelas ◽  
Christos Mihos ◽  
Orlando Santana
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Mitral Annuloplasty ◽  
Technical Details ◽  
Mitral Apparatus

In patients with functional mitral regurgitation, the placement of a sling encircling both papillary muscles in conjunction with mitral annuloplasty appears to be a rational approach for surgical correction, because it addresses both the mitral valve and the deformities of the subvalvular mitral apparatus. Reports in the literature that describe the utilization of this technique are few, and mainly involve a median sternotomy approach. The purpose of this communication is to describe the technical details of performing this procedure via a minimally invasive approach.

scholarly journals Totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery: early experience in 188 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Chen ◽  
Ling-chen Huang ◽  
Dao-zhong Chen ◽  
Liang-wan Chen ◽  
Zi-he Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Mitral Valve Disease ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
Endoscopic Technique ◽  
Venous Cannula ◽  
Defect Repair

Abstract Introduction Totally endoscopic technique has been widely used in cardiac surgery, and minimally invasive totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery has been developed as an alternative to median sternotomy for many patients with mitral valve disease. In this study, we describe our experience about a modified minimally invasive totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery and reported the preliminary results of totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of totally endoscopic technique in mitral valve surgery. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed the profiles of 188 patients who were treated for mitral valve disease by modified totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery at our institution between January 2019 and December 2020. The procedure was performed under endoscopic right minithoracotomy and with femoro-femoral cannulation using the single two-stage venous cannula. Results A total of 188 patients underwent total endoscopic mitral valve surgery. Fifty-six patients had concomitant tricuspid valvuloplasty, 11 patients underwent concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial septal defect repair was performed in three patients. Only one patient postoperatively died of multi-organ failure. Two patients were converted to median sternotomy. Except for one patient underwent operation to stop the bleeding from the incision site, no other serious complications nor reintervention occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions The modified totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery performed at our institution is technically feasible and safe with the same efficacy as reported studies.

Minimally Invasive Pulmonary Fibroelastoma Resection

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Nellis ◽  
Charles M. Wojnarski ◽  
Zachary W. Fitch ◽  
Nicholas A. Andersen ◽  
Joseph W. Turek
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Main Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Pulmonary Valve Replacement ◽  
Primary Cardiac Tumor ◽  
The Right

Pulmonary fibroelastomas are a rare primary cardiac tumor with less than 50 cases reported in the literature to date. We performed a minimally invasive valve-sparing tumor resection through a left anterior mini-incision (LAMI). The procedure was performed without cardiac arrest or aortic cross clamp, expediting postoperative recovery and allowing for an uncomplicated discharge on postoperative day 5. LAMI is a safe and reliable alternative to median sternotomy for patients requiring interventions on the right ventricular outflow tract and main pulmonary artery, including pulmonary fibroelastoma resection and pulmonary valve replacement when needed.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. An anesthesiologist''s viewpoint

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Shmyrev ◽  
A. V. Bogachev-prokofev ◽  
V. V. Lomivorotov ◽  
D. N. Ponomarev ◽  
P. P. Perovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Invasive Group

We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of 75 patients undergoing video-assisted mitral valve repair with right minithoracotomy over a period from November 2011 to August 2013. The control group comprised 71 patients operated on mitral valve by using median sternotomy during the same period. Median (25th; 75th) times of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping were significantly longer in the minimally invasive group (180 [139; 224] and 111 [87; 145] min, respectively) as compared to the controls (84 [69; 117] and 62 [49; 81 ] min, respectively), p<0.01. Fatal outcome occurred in 2 (2.7%) cases in the minimally invasive group versus none in the controls. In both cases death resulted from intraoperative aortic dissection. While ventilation time and intensive care unit stay were comparable across the groups, postoperative respiratory failure occurred in 6 (8%) cases in the minimally invasive group versus none in the controls (p<0.05). No other significant differences in the postoperative course were observed between the groups. The results of the present study are generally consistent with the world's tendencies. On the other hand, complication rates observed in the minimally invasive group present a considerable economic burden and require substantial human resources in the postoperative period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document