scholarly journals Incidental Findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine in the Asymptomatic Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 095-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Ramadorai ◽  
Justin Hire ◽  
Erika Brodt ◽  
Joseph Dettori ◽  
John DeVine
BMJ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 339 (aug17 1) ◽  
pp. b3016-b3016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Morris ◽  
W. N Whiteley ◽  
W T Longstreth ◽  
F. Weber ◽  
Y.-C. Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette B. L. J. Elders ◽  
Sergei M. Hermelijn ◽  
Harm A. W. M. Tiddens ◽  
Bas Pullens ◽  
Pjotr A. Wielopolski ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k4577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna M Gibson ◽  
Laura Paul ◽  
Francesca M Chappell ◽  
Malcolm Macleod ◽  
William N Whiteley ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To determine prevalence and types of potentially serious incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in apparently asymptomatic adults, describe factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings, and summarise information on follow-up and final diagnoses. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Citation searches of relevant articles and authors’ files in Medline and Embase (from inception to 25 April 2017). Review methods Eligible studies included prevalence and types of incidental findings detected among apparently asymptomatic adults undergoing MRI of the brain, thorax, abdomen, or brain and body. Data on study population and methods, prevalence and types of incidental findings, and final diagnoses were extracted. Pooled prevalence was estimated by random effects meta-analysis, and heterogeneity by τ 2 statistics. Main outcome measures Prevalence of potentially serious incidental findings on MRI of the brain, thorax, abdomen, and brain and body. Results Of 5905 retrieved studies, 32 (0.5%) met the inclusion criteria (n=27 643 participants). Pooled prevalence of potentially serious incidental findings was 3.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 27.1%) on brain and body MRI, 1.4% (1.0% to 2.1%) on brain MRI, 1.3% (0.2% to 8.1%) on thoracic MRI, and 1.9% (0.3% to 12.0%) on abdominal MRI. Pooled prevalence rose after including incidental findings of uncertain potential seriousness (12.8% (3.9% to 34.3%), 1.7% (1.1% to 2.6%), 3.0% (0.8% to 11.3%), and 4.5% (1.5% to 12.9%), respectively). There was generally substantial heterogeneity among included studies. About half the potentially serious incidental findings were suspected malignancies (brain, 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 0.9%); thorax, 0.6% (0.1% to 3.1%); abdomen, 1.3% (0.2% to 9.3%); brain and body, 2.3% (0.3% to 15.4%)). There were few informative data on potential sources of between-study variation or factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings. Limited data suggested that relatively few potentially serious incidental findings had serious final diagnoses (48/234, 20.5%). Conclusions A substantial proportion of apparently asymptomatic adults will have potentially serious incidental findings on MRI, but little is known of their health consequences. Systematic, long term follow-up studies are needed to better inform on these consequences and the implications for policies on feedback of potentially serious incidental findings. Systematic review registration Prospero CRD42016029472.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Steffens ◽  
M.J. Hancock ◽  
C.G. Maher ◽  
C. Williams ◽  
T.S. Jensen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document